Art Age Software wrote:
> Yes, indeed. I have successfully changed both the primary interface
> and the miimon value **while the interface is up** by directly writing
> to the /sys/class/net/bondX/bonding/{Key} files. Changing the bonding
> mode is not allowed while the interface is up (probably a
>Very interesting.
>
>Looking under the hood, it's actually handled by the
>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-eth script, which writes the
>values to the pseudo-files under /sys/class/net/bondX/bonding/, so
>there you go, another way to change that dinamically without having to
>restart the inter
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Art Age Software <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That works! I did not realize that the Red Hat network scripts have
> support for bonding options. (I did not find this documented
> anywhere.) But sure enough, I am able to set up a different primary
> interface for eac
Tim,
That works! I did not realize that the Red Hat network scripts have
support for bonding options. (I did not find this documented
anywhere.) But sure enough, I am able to set up a different primary
interface for each bond using this method.
Thanks so much!
Sam
>Hi,
>
>I configure bonding in
So, has anybody on this list gotten the bonding driver working with
more than a single bond and **different options** on the bonds in
CentOS 3/4/5 (I'm using 5.2)?
I am starting to believe that this is in fact a problem with Red Hat
kernels. But if so, I am surprised that it has persisted so long
>>Does the second bonding interface have no primary interface, then? What
>>exactly happens?
Yes, exactly. The second bond comes up with no primary interface:
# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
Bonding Mode: fault-tolerance (active-backup)
Primary Slave: eth0
Currently Active Slave: eth0
MII Status: u
Hi,
--On 5. Juli 2008 09:45:16 -0700 Art Age Software <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
could you describe in more detail?
What exactly is ignored? The options do not look much different.
As I said, I am trying to set a different primary interface for each
bond: eth0 for bond0, and eth2 for b
>>Hi,
>>
>>could you describe in more detail?
>>What exactly is ignored? The options do not look much different.
As I said, I am trying to set a different primary interface for each
bond: eth0 for bond0, and eth2 for bond1.
>>Did you try without renaming? I do not use it, but it works nonetheless
8 matches
Mail list logo
