On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:56:31 -0800
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> an idle machine with nothing but a ``screen saver'' running
> seemed to have about 30% CPU utilization which dropped near zero
> as soon as some activity shut the screen saver down.
Some screensavers on Linux do the sam
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007, Scott Silva wrote:
>on 12/6/2007 2:57 PM Les Bell spake the following:
>>Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>Yeah... ssh into the server, vi whatever.conf re-[start|load] service, exit
>>ssh.
>>"the simple things are sometimes the best!"
>><<
>>
>>Darn straight. And us
Mainly it will all depend on "your" server specifications and network
setup. We use VNC to remotely control the Windows boxes on the network and
it does an ok job, but even T1 to T1 we have a bit of lag.
We also use FreeNX for remote desktop features and it is quite fast from
home to office, it do
on 12/6/2007 2:57 PM Les Bell spake the following:
Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah... ssh into the server, vi whatever.conf re-[start|load] service, exit
ssh.
"the simple things are sometimes the best!"
<<
Darn straight. And using ssh-agent (or Pageant with PuTTY on Windows) in
conj
Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
Yeah... ssh into the server, vi whatever.conf re-[start|load] service, exit
ssh.
"the simple things are sometimes the best!"
<<
Darn straight. And using ssh-agent (or Pageant with PuTTY on Windows) in
conjunction with key forwarding, you can make it easy
on 12/6/2007 2:25 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Les Bell wrote:
Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1 to 3 where 1 is the 'best' for the catagory and 3 the loser.
<<
You fogot the ssh/vi combination, which rates 1 across the board.
ssh/vi
Yeah... ssh into the ser
6 matches
Mail list logo
