on 7-13-2008 3:42 PM Ryan Nichols spake the following:
Paul wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If it works ok on the old kernel, it should also work OK on the new
one.
Not if it's a binary-driver...
I'm familiar with the card & driver ... it's a binary blob with a bit of
so
on 7-13-2008 2:58 PM Ryan Nichols spake the following:
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Am 13.07.2008 um 22:14 schrieb Ryan Nichols:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
If it works ok on the old kernel, it should also work OK on the new
one.
Not if it's a binary-driver...
___
on 7-10-2008 1:11 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Sean Carolan wrote:
CRITICAL : [ipv6_test] Kernel is not compiled with IPv6 support
[ OK ]
FATAL: Module off not found.
CRITICAL : [ipv6_test] Kernel is not compiled with IPv6 su
Thank you all. I tries to install 5.1 then I add option
"exclude=kernel*" in yum.conf, install testing kernel and upgrade to
5.2.
thanks again!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 6-26-2008 10:54 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 6-26-2008 7:16 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a bunch of DecTOPs. Use the AMD Geode chip.
Yesterday I upgraded one of them, and got the dreaded
Scott Silva wrote:
on 6-26-2008 7:16 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a bunch of DecTOPs. Use the AMD Geode chip.
Yesterday I upgraded one of them, and got the dreaded Kernel
panic. Something about powernowk8. I could boot up
on 6-26-2008 7:16 AM Robert Moskowitz spake the following:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a bunch of DecTOPs. Use the AMD Geode chip.
Yesterday I upgraded one of them, and got the dreaded Kernel panic.
Something about powernowk8. I could boot up with the old kernel
On 6/20/08, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As most of us have found out at some time;
> brand new does not always equal OK.
> I have had plenty of hardware that was dead on arrival or dead in days.
> Check
> the obvious of re-seating all removable parts like memory and cards, and
> also
on 6-20-2008 8:23 AM Lanny Marcus spake the following:
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CentOS release 5 (Final)
Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 on an i686
ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
Bank 3: f62000
Jerry Geis wrote:
nate wrote:
>/ Jerry Geis wrote:
/>>/ I created a i586 install image with qemu.
/>>/ I downloaded the SRPMS package for the kernel and installed it.
/>>/ I cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS
/>>/ rpmbuild -bp --target i586 kernelXXX.spec
/>>/ I does a bunch of things but it did not build
Jerry Geis wrote:
> What do you mean, I thought specifying the --target would apply the
> right patches?
> What else do I need?
Coming in at the end of the thread I'm not sure what the original
question(s) were about but in my experience if the patches are referenced
in the spec file, using rpmbu
nate wrote:
>/ Jerry Geis wrote:
/>>/ I created a i586 install image with qemu.
/>>/ I downloaded the SRPMS package for the kernel and installed it.
/>>/ I cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS
/>>/ rpmbuild -bp --target i586 kernelXXX.spec
/>>/ I does a bunch of things but it did not build a new kernel and p
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:28:14PM -0800, Timothy Selivanow alleged:
> Yes, you are correct that RAID doesn't help with human failings.
> However, LVM[1], backups, and change control management do ;)
Then it's a good thing he has a nightly backup to an external harddrive.
pgpknYveDEV5D.pgp
Desc
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 07:23 +1100, Steven Haigh wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Scott Silva
> > Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 7:15 AM
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Subject: [CentOS] Re
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Scott Silva
> Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 7:15 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Re: Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 fails on network.
>
> on 2/14/2008 10:38 A
on 2/14/2008 10:38 AM Steven Haigh spake the following:
I have found the issue with this - and now I feel quite dumb.
In this box, I keep a second HDD (/dev/hdc) which is mirrored nightly from
the primary HDD (/dev/hda).
This is an exact copy - initially created via dd, then kept up to date via
on 2/14/2008 10:06 AM Steven Haigh spake the following:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of William L. Maltby
Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 4:19 AM
To: CentOS General List
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 fails on network
I have found the issue with this - and now I feel quite dumb.
In this box, I keep a second HDD (/dev/hdc) which is mirrored nightly from
the primary HDD (/dev/hda).
This is an exact copy - initially created via dd, then kept up to date via
rsync on a nightly basis. This is so that if the primary
Just replying to myself for this - I realised that after a 'failed' boot, it
would also overwrite the boot logs when the system came back up with the
correct kernel/grub config ;)
I've made a few changes and added a bit more to the script - and I think its
about ready to use.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of William L. Maltby
> Sent: Friday, 15 February 2008 4:19 AM
> To: CentOS General List
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5 fails on network.
>
> On Thu, 2008-02-
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 08:44 -0800, Scott Silva wrote:
> on 2/14/2008 2:25 AM William L. Maltby spake the following:
> >
> > If grub had a "one time" next boot like LILO, I'd have some more
> > thoughts, but <*sigh*>
> >
> I have been hoping for that option for years. I have used other options li
on 2/14/2008 2:25 AM William L. Maltby spake the following:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 14:57 +1100, Steven Haigh wrote:
There are a number of differences in the initrd, although nothing that I
would call obvious as causing an issue..
-
# gunzip -cd /boot/initrd-2.6.18-8.1.8.el5.i
on 12/7/2007 8:05 PM John Thomas spake the following:
Cough, cough, cough (I have a bit of a cold, please excuse me)
Oh great, now my MUA has a virus! ;-P
You need to cover your keyboard when you cough.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if th
on 11/28/2007 9:23 AM Ugo Bellavance spake the following:
Hi,
Here's he setup.
Original Kernel:
kernel-smp-2.6.9-42.EL, booting fine.
Error with kernel-2.6.9-55.0.12.EL (and kernel-2.6.9-55.0.12.ELsmp)
No volume groups found
Volume group "VolGroup00" not found.
ERROR: /bin/lvm exited a
centos spake the following on 8/21/2007 4:45 AM:
> Thanks every one for all your help,
>
> using VNC seems to be a good option for those who has no access to console
> and want to install Centos remotely, however just to test , I tried to
> upgrade
> Centos 4.5 to Centos 5, but it progressed almos
Thanks every one for all your help,
using VNC seems to be a good option for those who has no access to console
and want to install Centos remotely, however just to test , I tried to
upgrade
Centos 4.5 to Centos 5, but it progressed almost to the end and then
stoped with
some error. nothing upg
centos spake the following on 8/20/2007 4:10 AM:
>
> Centos 4 kernel's base version is 2.6.9 and Centos 5 kernel's base
> version is 2.6.18.
> and I couldn't find anything in Centos mirror sites and repository ( I
> really need kernel version 2.6.18. )
>
> Downloaded and installed kernel 2.16.18
Barry Brimer spake the following on 8/19/2007 10:18 AM:
>> my server is in remote location, and I don't see any grub screen, so I
>> was wondering
>> if there is an option that I can specify the kernel that Linux to be
>> booted at the reboot time,
>> some thing like shutdown -g0 -i6 which_kernel-o
Scott Silva wrote:
Ugo Bellavance spake the following on 6/11/2007 9:44 PM:
Hi,
Box is a dual-dual core opteron. Centos4. Just upgraded t the
latest kernel (2.6.9-55).
The UP kernel installed fine, but the smp kernel didn't install.
What should I do? Is that normal? Original kernel
Ugo Bellavance spake the following on 6/11/2007 9:44 PM:
> Hi,
>
> Box is a dual-dual core opteron. Centos4. Just upgraded t the
> latest kernel (2.6.9-55).
>
> The UP kernel installed fine, but the smp kernel didn't install.
> What should I do? Is that normal? Original kernel was a s
30 matches
Mail list logo
