on 11/27/2007 10:41 AM Rodrigo Barbosa spake the following:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 11:28:58AM -0200, Heitor Augusto M Cardozo wrote:
- EXT3: reliable but very slow to read many small files.
- ReiserFS: best performance but unreliable and bad recove
Scott Silva schrieb:
What i want to know is: Anyone use or recommend EXT3 for Maildir?
My configuration: 3Ware 9650SE-8LPML, 8 drives SATA2 ST3500630AS
500GB on RAID 10.
Ext3 is pretty good if directory indexes are on.;
See http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ext3_Filesystem_Tips
If the
Scott Silva wrote:
Ext3 is pretty good if directory indexes are on.;
See http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ext3_Filesystem_Tips
and, disable 'access time', which is almost always a good idea.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://
on 11/26/2007 11:22 AM Heitor Augusto M Cardozo spake the following:
Hi all,
In last year, i had made some research and benchmarks based on CentOS 4
to know which filesystem is better for Maildir: ReiserFS, XFS or EXT3.
My conclusion was as follows:
- EXT3: reliable but very slow to read ma
4 matches
Mail list logo
