Re: [CentOS] Re: "yum update" did not update kernel on one box

2008-05-08 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 10:30 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: > on 5-8-2008 7:39 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# fdisk -l > > > > Disk /dev/hda: 81.9 GB, 81964302336 bytes > > 240 heads, 63 sectors/track, 10587 cylinders > > Units = cylinders of 15120 * 512 = 7741440 bytes > >

[CentOS] Re: "yum update" did not update kernel on one box

2008-05-08 Thread Scott Silva
on 5-8-2008 7:39 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following: On 5/7/08, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:58 -0500: Kai: I am not using Windows Boot Manager. Grub comes up, as on the 2 boxes, where things are working properly. Just to be sure, it's really grub? Yo

[CentOS] Re: "yum update" did not update kernel on one box

2008-05-07 Thread Scott Silva
on 5-7-2008 3:19 PM Kai Schaetzl spake the following: Lanny Marcus wrote on Wed, 07 May 2008 15:10:58 -0500: Kai: I am not using Windows Boot Manager. Grub comes up, as on the 2 boxes, where things are working properly. Just to be sure, it's really grub? You get a somewhat blueish screen that

Re: [CentOS] Re: "yum update" did not update kernel on one box

2008-05-07 Thread Michael Simpson
On 5/7/08, Robert Nichols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Simpson wrote: > > > do you have any mention of the new kernel in /etc/grub.conf? > > > > you might find that the default kernel is still the original one in > > which case there would be a line like > > default=1 in grub.conf > > chang

[CentOS] Re: "yum update" did not update kernel on one box

2008-05-07 Thread Robert Nichols
Michael Simpson wrote: do you have any mention of the new kernel in /etc/grub.conf? you might find that the default kernel is still the original one in which case there would be a line like default=1 in grub.conf changing this to default=0 might bring up the new kernel on reboot i have an old d