Steve Clark wrote on 05/11/2011 04:12 PM:
...
> Thanks, but I am already using that kernel. I want to get a vanilla
> kernel.org 2.6.32.xx kernel running
> on 6.0.
>
> In fact following AY directions I was able to rebuild the srpms for
> kernel-2.6.32-71.29.2, but again that
> is not the generic ke
On 11/05/11 19:01, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/11/2011 12:32 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
>> Hello Steve,
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>>I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>>>
>>>
On 05/11/2011 04:01 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Steve,
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
Just checking now and still don'
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>>
>> Just checking now and still don't see any. Am I missing something?
>
On 5/11/2011 12:32 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>>
>> Just checking now and still don't see any. Am I
Hello Steve,
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 09:10 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> I had looked there before and there we no kernels for 6.0.
>
> Just checking now and still don't see any. Am I missing something?
The fact that 6.0 hasn't been released ye
Steve Clark wrote:
>On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Steve Clark wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
>>> to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
>>> hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
>>>
>>> http
On 05/11/2011 08:49 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
check out
Steve Clark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does anyone have updates to this page for 6.0. I would like
> to try to build a 2.6.32.xx kernel.org kernel and see if I still gets
> hangs on my CentuarHauls boxes.
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel
check out the elrepo-kernel repo:
http://elrepo.org/
On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu fami
On 05/11/2011 05:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu fami
> If you take a look on google for "CentaurHauls i686" you will see that
> this CPU/chipset SAYS it fully supports i686 but it really does not.
> All of EL6 is i686 and not i586 (which CentaurHauls really
> fully supports).
>
> I think you are going to have issues with this CPU and EL6 forever.
>
On 05/10/2011 05:42 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
>> VIA Eden Processor?
>>
>> cat /proc/cpuinfo
>> processor : 0
>> vendor_id : CentaurHauls
>> cpu family : 6
>> model
If I had to guess, it would be that the OS is considered an "enterprise" OS,
and that the CPU is too low end, now, to be considered that. It is kind of low
end now for even personal use.
Not that people only use the OS for high end server hardware :)
At work, we still have to support 500MHz Pe
On 04/26/2011 08:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : VIA Eden Processor 500MHz
I am testin
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Steve Clark
> wrote:
>
>> Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
>> VIA Eden Processor?
> (snip)
>> I traced it down to this code, which is not in the standard
>> kernel.org kernel-2.6.32.36: from kernel-2.6.3
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
> VIA Eden Processor?
(snip)
> I traced it down to this code, which is not in the standard kernel.org
> kernel-2.6.32.36:
> from kernel-2.6.32.36
> static void __cpuinit early_init_cen
On 04/26/2011 09:55 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/26/2011 07:48 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 04/26/2011 08:43 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
Possibly ... Does that processor have
On 04/26/2011 07:48 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/26/2011 08:43 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>> centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
>>> VIA Eden Processor?
>> Possibly ... Does that processor have PAE? The non-PAE kernel wa
On 04/26/2011 08:43 AM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
Possibly ... Does that processor have PAE? The non-PAE kernel was
dropped, the current 'normal' kernel requires a PAE-capable
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
> VIA Eden Processor?
Possibly ... Does that processor have PAE? The non-PAE kernel was
dropped, the current 'normal' kernel requires a PAE-capable processor.
> UNSUPPORTED HARDWARE DEVICE:
Hello,
Anybody know the reason RedHat decided not to support the
VIA Eden Processor?
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 13
model name : VIA Eden Processor 500MHz
I am testing, (using ayplus kernel) and get the followi
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:04:56PM -0500, Nicolas Ross wrote:
> Hi !
>
> We are curently deploying an 8 nodes cluster where we have a RHEL 6
> license at great costs (~14 k$/y). It will be our new production
> environment for mission-critical services.
>
> Now our aging developpement server (old
>> But 6 isn't out yet. (by the way, when ;-)
>
> Oh mani padmay when it's done
That I already know, that was kinda of a sarcastic question that required
kinda sarcastic answer ;-)
I know that 5.6 is on it's way relatively soon, and work on 6 will continue
afterwards...
__
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Ross
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 4:05 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] RHEL 6 <-> CentOS 6 ?
>
> Hi !
>
> Bu
Hi !
We are curently deploying an 8 nodes cluster where we have a RHEL 6 license
at great costs (~14 k$/y). It will be our new production environment for
mission-critical services.
Now our aging developpement server (old p4 with 1.5 gig of ram) need to be
updated. We will be installing on hard
26 matches
Mail list logo
