On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 08:04:43 pm Les Mikesell wrote:
> I think there are ways that drives can fail that would make them not be
> detected
> at all - and for an autodetected raid member in a system that has been
> rebooted,
> not leave much evidence of where it was when it worked. If
On 2/2/11 5:57 PM, Chuck Munro wrote:
>
> The use of the new RHEL-6/CentOS-6 'udevadm' command nicely maps out the
> hardware path no matter the order the drives are detected/named, and
> since hardware paths are fixed, I just have to attach a little tag to
> each SATA cable with that path number o
On 02/02/2011 09:00 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 02:06:15 am Chuck Munro wrote:
>> > The real key is to carefully label each SATA cable and its associated
>> > drive. Then the little mapping script can be used to identify the
>> > faulty drive which mdadm reports
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 02:06:15 am Chuck Munro wrote:
> The real key is to carefully label each SATA cable and its associated
> drive. Then the little mapping script can be used to identify the
> faulty drive which mdadm reports by its device name. It just occurred
> to me that whenev
Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> On 1/30/11 1:37 PM, Chuck Munro wrote:
>> > Hello list members,
>> >
>> > My adventure into udev rules has taken an interesting turn. I did
>> > discover a stupid error in the way I was attempting to assign static
>> > disk device names on CentOS-5.5, so that's out of the w
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Chuck Munro wrote:
> Hello list members,
>
> My adventure into udev rules has taken an interesting turn. I did
> discover a stupid error in the way I was attempting to assign static
> disk device names on CentOS-5.5, so that's out of the way.
>
> But in the proces
On 1/30/11 1:37 PM, Chuck Munro wrote:
> Hello list members,
>
> My adventure into udev rules has taken an interesting turn. I did
> discover a stupid error in the way I was attempting to assign static
> disk device names on CentOS-5.5, so that's out of the way.
>
> But in the process of exploring
At Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:37:19 -0800 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hello list members,
>
> My adventure into udev rules has taken an interesting turn. I did
> discover a stupid error in the way I was attempting to assign static
> disk device names on CentOS-5.5, so that's out of the way.
>
Hello list members,
My adventure into udev rules has taken an interesting turn. I did
discover a stupid error in the way I was attempting to assign static
disk device names on CentOS-5.5, so that's out of the way.
But in the process of exploring, I installed a trial copy of RHEL-6 on
the new
9 matches
Mail list logo
