On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 22:59 -0800, MHR wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2008 12:21 PM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The obvious: is wireshark installed?
>
> No (duh) - mea culpa
ROTFL!
You've made me feel so much better. It's a relief to know I'm not alone
in occasional dufus move
On Jan 24, 2008 12:21 PM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The obvious: is wireshark installed?
No (duh) - mea culpa
> Impatience? There is latency from time of announcement to time of a
> specific mirror update.
It was over ten hours later, but since the above is true, who c
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 21:42 -0800, MHR wrote:
> Has anyone else seen this?
>
> I recently got the announcement about the xorg 1.5 update being
> available, so I ran yum update to get it.
>
> To my surprise, I found that yum did not see it at all.
>
> With some help from Karanbir (thanks again),
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 21:42 -0800, MHR wrote:
>
Nevermind? On 5 it has the "s', on 4 it doesn't.
--
Bill
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 21:42 -0800, MHR wrote:
> Has anyone else seen this?
>
> I recently got the announcement about the xorg 1.5 update being
> available, so I ran yum update to get it.
>
> To my surprise, I found that yum did not see it at all.
>
> With some help from Karanbir (thanks again),
Has anyone else seen this?
I recently got the announcement about the xorg 1.5 update being available,
so I ran yum update to get it.
To my surprise, I found that yum did not see it at all.
With some help from Karanbir (thanks again), we decided there might be
something wrong with my repo path, s
6 matches
Mail list logo
