Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 05:55 PM, Albert McCann wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: CentOS On Behalf Of H >> Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 4:59 PM >> To: centos@centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82 >> >>> One thing

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 03:42 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:32:04 -0400 > H wrote: > >> Is something at Google responsible for this problem? > In one of your (numerous) previous messages you said that Firefox wasn't > working properly either, so I'd say it's not a problem with Google unless

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread Albert McCann
> -Original Message- > From: CentOS On Behalf Of H > Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 4:59 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82 > > > One thing remains: I would also like to move my entire browsing > history from ch

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 04:44 PM, H wrote: > On 04/05/2021 02:34 PM, Richard wrote: >>> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200 >>> From: Simon Matter >>> >>> Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed >>> Chromium from EPEL for them. Over the time, we had several problems >>> wh

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 02:34 PM, Richard wrote: >> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200 >> From: Simon Matter >> >> Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed >> Chromium from EPEL for them. Over the time, we had several problems >> where a build didn't work and also updates

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread Frank Cox
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:32:04 -0400 H wrote: > Is something at Google responsible for this problem? In one of your (numerous) previous messages you said that Firefox wasn't working properly either, so I'd say it's not a problem with Google unless you're using their dns servers or something simila

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 01:38 PM, H wrote: > On 04/05/2021 12:49 PM, H wrote: >> On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote: On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote: > On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: >> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 >> H wrote: >> >>> Here are two typical exampl

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread Richard
> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200 > From: Simon Matter > > Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed > Chromium from EPEL for them. Over the time, we had several problems > where a build didn't work and also updates were not in time. We > also had problems wh

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 12:49 PM, H wrote: > On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >>> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote: On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 > H wrote: > >> Here are two typical examples: > Javascript is disabled? > >>

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote: >>> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 H wrote: > Here are two typical examples: Javascript is disabled? >>> No, just checked that Javascript is allow

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread Simon Matter
> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote: >> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: >>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 >>> H wrote: >>> Here are two typical examples: >>> Javascript is disabled? >>> >> No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser settings. >> When I load the browse

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote: > On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: >> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 >> H wrote: >> >>> Here are two typical examples: >> Javascript is disabled? >> > No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser settings. When I > load the browser and try

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-05 Thread H
On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 > H wrote: > >> Here are two typical examples: > Javascript is disabled? > No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser settings. When I load the browser and try to access eg nytimes.com I see "Establishing

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread Frank Cox
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400 H wrote: > Here are two typical examples: Javascript is disabled? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/lis

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread H
On 04/04/2021 02:46 PM, H wrote: > On 04/04/2021 12:35 PM, Jos Vos wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 12:29:48PM -0400, H wrote: >> >>Where can I find the older release, ie 88.0.4324.150 of chromium? It >>is no longer in EPEL. >> >> Look in koji: >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packa

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread H
On 04/04/2021 12:35 PM, Jos Vos wrote: > On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 12:29:48PM -0400, H wrote: > >Where can I find the older release, ie 88.0.4324.150 of chromium? It >is no longer in EPEL. > > Look in koji: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=22672 > > And the particu

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
On 04.04.21 16:19, H wrote: I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version 89.0.4389.82 from EPEL. Did you tested the .90 release? yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing "chrom*" -- Leon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https:/

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
On 04.04.21 18:29, H wrote: On 04/04/2021 11:24 AM, Richard wrote: Date: Sunday, April 04, 2021 10:19:34 -0400 From: H I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version 89.0.4389.82 from EPEL. Although this version was released a few weeks ago, I had had the previous version of chrom

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread Jos Vos
On Sun, Apr 04, 2021 at 12:29:48PM -0400, H wrote: Where can I find the older release, ie 88.0.4324.150 of chromium? It is no longer in EPEL. Look in koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=22672 And the particular version you mentioned: https://koji.fedoraproject.

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread H
On 04/04/2021 11:24 AM, Richard wrote: >> Date: Sunday, April 04, 2021 10:19:34 -0400 >> From: H >> >> I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version >> 89.0.4389.82 from EPEL. >> >> Although this version was released a few weeks ago, I had had the >> previous version of chromium (88.0

Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread Richard
> Date: Sunday, April 04, 2021 10:19:34 -0400 > From: H > > I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version > 89.0.4389.82 from EPEL. > > Although this version was released a few weeks ago, I had had the > previous version of chromium (88.0.4324.150) running for several > weeks but i

[CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82

2021-04-04 Thread H
I am running CentOS 7 and just updated chromium to version 89.0.4389.82 from EPEL. Although this version was released a few weeks ago, I had had the previous version of chromium (88.0.4324.150) running for several weeks but it crashed and the new version was then loaded. The older version work