2009/4/28 Filipe Brandenburger
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 16:01, Bo Lynch wrote:
> > I think I found the culprit but not sure if by taking this out it will be
> > a risk. When I remove this statement things work
> > iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -m state --state NEW, INVALID -j DROP
> >
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 16:01, Bo Lynch wrote:
> I think I found the culprit but not sure if by taking this out it will be
> a risk. When I remove this statement things work
> iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -m state --state NEW, INVALID -j DROP
>
> If I drop the NEW it works. Should I be con
Quoting Bo Lynch :
> On Mon, April 27, 2009 12:50 pm, D Tucny wrote:
> > 2009/4/28 Bo Lynch
> >
> >> On Mon, April 27, 2009 12:01 pm, Dan Carl wrote:
> >> > Bo Lynch wrote:
> >> >> I'm having some port forwarding issues issues with iptables.
> >> >> We are using iptables as a firewall with 2 nics
On Mon, April 27, 2009 12:50 pm, D Tucny wrote:
> 2009/4/28 Bo Lynch
>
>> On Mon, April 27, 2009 12:01 pm, Dan Carl wrote:
>> > Bo Lynch wrote:
>> >> I'm having some port forwarding issues issues with iptables.
>> >> We are using iptables as a firewall with 2 nics and on ip alias.
>> >> I'm trying
Bo Lynch wrote:
> On Mon, April 27, 2009 12:01 pm, Dan Carl wrote:
>
>> Bo Lynch wrote:
>>
>>> I'm having some port forwarding issues issues with iptables.
>>> We are using iptables as a firewall with 2 nics and on ip alias.
>>> I'm trying to port forward on the alias ip
>>> eth0 = 65.x.x.1
Quoting Bo Lynch :
> On Mon, April 27, 2009 12:01 pm, Dan Carl wrote:
> > Bo Lynch wrote:
> >> I'm having some port forwarding issues issues with iptables.
> >> We are using iptables as a firewall with 2 nics and on ip alias.
> >> I'm trying to port forward on the alias ip
> >> eth0 = 65.x.x.1
> >
2009/4/28 Bo Lynch
> On Mon, April 27, 2009 12:01 pm, Dan Carl wrote:
> > Bo Lynch wrote:
> >> I'm having some port forwarding issues issues with iptables.
> >> We are using iptables as a firewall with 2 nics and on ip alias.
> >> I'm trying to port forward on the alias ip
> >> eth0 = 65.x.x.1
>
On Mon, April 27, 2009 12:01 pm, Dan Carl wrote:
> Bo Lynch wrote:
>> I'm having some port forwarding issues issues with iptables.
>> We are using iptables as a firewall with 2 nics and on ip alias.
>> I'm trying to port forward on the alias ip
>> eth0 = 65.x.x.1
>> eth0:1 = 65.x.x.2
>> eth1 = 192.
Bo Lynch wrote:
> I'm having some port forwarding issues issues with iptables.
> We are using iptables as a firewall with 2 nics and on ip alias.
> I'm trying to port forward on the alias ip
> eth0 = 65.x.x.1
> eth0:1 = 65.x.x.2
> eth1 = 192.168.x.x
>
> I'm wanting to forward certain ports(80,5071.
I'm having some port forwarding issues issues with iptables.
We are using iptables as a firewall with 2 nics and on ip alias.
I'm trying to port forward on the alias ip
eth0 = 65.x.x.1
eth0:1 = 65.x.x.2
eth1 = 192.168.x.x
I'm wanting to forward certain ports(80,5071...etc) that makes request on
et
10 matches
Mail list logo
