Re: [CentOS] Poor rsync performance after upgrade from 5.8 x86 to 6.3 x64 ["SOLVED"]

2012-10-16 Thread Tim Nelson
- Original Message - > Greetings- > > The subject sums it up... > > ... > And... apparently I'm braindead. It turns out the cron job was setup incorrectly such that it was starting 10 hours later than expected, resulting in the 10 hour increase in time. Final score is CentOS 1, me 0.

Re: [CentOS] Poor rsync performance after upgrade from 5.8 x86 to 6.3 x64

2012-10-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Tim Nelson wrote: > > I have a Dell 2950 acting as a general purpose 'storage' machine, handling > some NFS work for some local servers, and also pulling in rsync backups of > some largish filesystems over SSH. These backups, prior to the upgrade were > taking

Re: [CentOS] Poor rsync performance after upgrade from 5.8 x86 to 6.3 x64

2012-10-15 Thread Mogens Kjaer
On 10/16/2012 05:54 AM, Tim Nelson wrote: > All tips, pointers, suggestions, etc welcome. When you're rsync'ing, what does top (on source and destination) say? Is ssh or rsync using a lot of CPU? Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___

[CentOS] Poor rsync performance after upgrade from 5.8 x86 to 6.3 x64

2012-10-15 Thread Tim Nelson
Greetings- The subject sums it up... I have a Dell 2950 acting as a general purpose 'storage' machine, handling some NFS work for some local servers, and also pulling in rsync backups of some largish filesystems over SSH. These backups, prior to the upgrade were taking about 6 hours to complet