Vreme: 12/15/2011 08:32 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
> On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories:
>> http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo
>> There are few changes needed like "torakat" repo with now centosplus
>> kernels.
>
> Can you explain
Vreme: 12/15/2011 08:27 PM, Les Mikesell piše:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>> You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
>> yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
>> lesser priority (larger number). Like b
On 12/15/2011 01:27 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>> You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
>> yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
>> lesser priority (larger number). Like base
On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Here is how I decided to setup third party repositories:
> http://rpms.plnet.rs/CentDOS.repo
> There are few changes needed like "torakat" repo with now centosplus
> kernels.
Can you explain, please, about those "exclude=*releases" statements?
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
> yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
> lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3,
> rpmfusion-* =3, etc.
D
On 12/15/2011 04:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>
>
> You can keep all desired repositories enabled as long as you have
> yum-plugin-priorities installed and keep third-party repositories with
> lesser priority (larger number). Like base=1, epel=2, repoforge=3,
> rpmfusion-* =3, etc.
>
> H
Vreme: 12/15/2011 12:37 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
> On 12/13/2011 07:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
>>> To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
>>> for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks
On 12/13/2011 07:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
>> To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
>> for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks
>
> It is not wise to have third-party repositorie
Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
> To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
> for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks
It is not wise to have third-party repositories overwriting base
packages. This should only be used by h
On 12/12/2011 07:44 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 12/12/11 18:47, Anne Wilson wrote:
>> For a while now I've been seeing skipped-package notices, which I
>> don't really understand. I know it's a version mis-match, but all
>> my attempts to sort it out have failed, so I need help, please.
>> The curr
Hello Nicolas, Alexander,
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:11:36 +0100 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
wrote:
> wwp wrote:
> >
> > The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
> > from 'cr' then fails, see:
>
> It's yum. It's fragile.
> Whenever it doesn't do what you think it should, ru
wwp wrote:
>
> The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
> from 'cr' then fails, see:
It's yum. It's fragile.
Whenever it doesn't do what you think it should, run "yun clean all" and
try again.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
Am 13.12.2011 09:40, schrieb wwp:
> Hello there,
>
>
> since yersterday, there's a massive update ready for my CentOS 6 (kept
> up-to-date, including w/ cr updates).
>
> The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
> from 'cr' then fails, see:
With the release of 6.1 p
Hello there,
since yersterday, there's a massive update ready for my CentOS 6 (kept
up-to-date, including w/ cr updates).
The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
from 'cr' then fails, see:
[snip]
Installing for dependencies:
perl-CGI
On 12/12/11 18:47, Anne Wilson wrote:
> For a while now I've been seeing skipped-package notices, which I don't really
> understand. I know it's a version mis-match, but all my attempts to sort it
> out have failed, so I need help, please. The current state is
>
> Skipping filters plugin, no data
For a while now I've been seeing skipped-package notices, which I don't really
understand. I know it's a version mis-match, but all my attempts to sort it
out have failed, so I need help, please. The current state is
Skipping filters plugin, no data
--> Running transaction check
---> Package p
16 matches
Mail list logo
