On 7/6/19 2:52 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
The biggest DB is the Online Training DB, which are the same on both machine
as I constantly copy the data from the life server to the DIY.
Could you try the same operations on COPIES of the databases, on both machines?
An original live DB can be sl
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:46:19AM -0700, Gordon Messmer
(gordon.mess...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 7/3/19 11:43 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> > - How can it be that the DELL takes so much longer alltough on the far
> > better hardware?
> It looks like the DIY system has a CPU that's nearly twice
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 09:07:35AM +0200, Simon Matter via CentOS
(centos@centos.org) wrote:
> > Hi
>
> Two ideas:
>
> a) the DELL maybe faster over all but if I'm right single core speed is
> slower than on DEV machine.
Yes, but since BOTH have "other" things to do at the same time the sheer n
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 09:39:18AM +0200, Roberto Ragusa
(m...@robertoragusa.it) wrote:
> On 7/4/19 8:43 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
> >Clearly the development server is hardware wise way below the specs of the
> >Dell but
> >software wise they are identical (they get upgraded at the same time)
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 2:43 AM Jobst Schmalenbach
wrote:
> the development and life server in question run the same software setup:
> - CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810
> - bind 32:9.9.4-74.el7_6.1
> - Apache/2.4.6 (CentOS)
> - PHP 7.1.29
> - mysqld Ver 5.7.26
> - wordpress, woocommerce
On 7/3/19 11:43 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
- How can it be that the DELL takes so much longer alltough on the far better
hardware?
It looks like the DIY system has a CPU that's nearly twice as fast as
the Dell's. The additional CPU in the Dell will run more tasks
concurrently, but it
On 7/4/19 8:43 AM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
Clearly the development server is hardware wise way below the specs of the Dell
but
software wise they are identical (they get upgraded at the same time).
As a first step, you have to test subsystems one by one.
Try this to see how fast the CPU and
> Hi
>
> I need some advice what to do next, even if someone tells me to
> check out (an)other mailing list(s), tuning site or point me in a better
> direction how to solve my annoying problem: one server is much faster
> for certain tasks although on "shitty" hardware.
>
> I have tried many things
Hi
I need some advice what to do next, even if someone tells me to
check out (an)other mailing list(s), tuning site or point me in a better
direction how to solve my annoying problem: one server is much faster
for certain tasks although on "shitty" hardware.
I have tried many things to solve my i
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 at 8:11am, Dan Dansereau wrote
We have a DELL6850 with 8Gbytes of memory, four 3.2Ghz CPU's , perc 4
raid controller, with fourteen 300Gbyte 10Krpm disk on a powervault
220s, And a powervault 124T LTO-3 tape systems on a separate
160Mbyte/sec adaptec SCSI card.
Which card
> Does anybody have any experience on setting the OS/Kernel parameters to
> utilize the hardware at something more then a snails pace?
My guess is, that the CentOS kernel doesn't contain a driver for your harddisk
controller, and thus is falling back to some generic driver. Refer to the
controll
On 9/2/07, Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And what about a
> raw disk tape to raw tape copy ?
ops
raw disk to raw tape copy ?
>
> # dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/nst0 bs=32k count=32768
and with time :-)
# time dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/nst0 bs=32k count=32768
>
> PS: 14 disk in raid 0 is ver
Dan Dansereau wrote:
My apology for cross posting
We have a DELL6850 with 8Gbytes of memory, four 3.2Ghz CPU's , perc 4
raid controller, with fourteen 300Gbyte 10Krpm disk on a powervault
220s, And a powervault 124T LTO-3 tape systems on a separate
160Mbyte/sec adaptec SCSI card.
The disks are
And what about a
raw disk tape to raw tape copy ?
# dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/nst0 bs=32k count=32768
PS: 14 disk in raid 0 is very fragile, this should be used only for
caching data. With a PV220 maybe a backup engine then !
On 9/2/07, Dan Dansereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My apology for cros
My apology for cross posting
We have a DELL6850 with 8Gbytes of memory, four 3.2Ghz CPU's , perc 4
raid controller, with fourteen 300Gbyte 10Krpm disk on a powervault
220s, And a powervault 124T LTO-3 tape systems on a separate
160Mbyte/sec adaptec SCSI card.
The disks are configured as two 2Tby
15 matches
Mail list logo
