Hello,
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 13:50 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> I was wondering if the upstream updates released about 14
> hours ago are already being built.
It helps to first check the announce list :) . I hadn't expected such a
quick response, I didn't get a warning from my 4am cron
Hello,
The remote code execution issue that got introduced with 5.3.9 has me
worried a bit. I was wondering if the upstream updates released about 14
hours ago are already being built. As this appears to be quite a serious
issue I'm wondering if it's worth the trouble to downgrade php to a per
Jan
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 08:34 -0500, Bob McConnell wrote:
> Michael Kress wrote:
> > Craig White wrote:
> >> and if enough people actually convinced the developers that
> >> 5.2.9-2.el5.centos were feasible, then they would probably move it into
> >> the 'Extras' repository.
> >
> > ... here's one t
Bob McConnell wrote:
> I'll go one further. We run commercial web sites on CentOS 5.3 which
> must also be PCI compliant. Because of the security issues, the auditors
> have been complaining for two months that we don't have PHP 5.2.11
> installed yet, putting our PCI certification in jeopardy.
Michael Kress wrote:
Craig White wrote:
and if enough people actually convinced the developers that
5.2.9-2.el5.centos were feasible, then they would probably move it into
the 'Extras' repository.
... here's one trying to 'convince'! ;-)
I'm using that package from c5-testing since a m
On 11/27/2009 01:34 PM, Bob McConnell wrote:
> We are trying to figure out how to handle this issue short of having to
> compile PHP ourselves. That would violate the agreement we have with the
> hosting service.
The whole PCI DSS issue is fairly important to many people at the
moment, and wht do
Michael Kress wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
>> and if enough people actually convinced the developers that
>> 5.2.9-2.el5.centos were feasible, then they would probably move it into
>> the 'Extras' repository.
>
> ... here's one trying to 'convince'! ;-)
> I'm using that package from c5-testing sinc
Craig White wrote:
> and if enough people actually convinced the developers that
> 5.2.9-2.el5.centos were feasible, then they would probably move it into
> the 'Extras' repository.
... here's one trying to 'convince'! ;-)
I'm using that package from c5-testing since a month or so and I
encountere
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 23:22 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Craig White wrote:
> > For the 2 threads going on about PHP 5.2/5.3...
> >
> > CentOS tracks upstream whose version is...
> > php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3
> >
> > If you want something newer, you have to go off the b
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Craig White wrote:
> For the 2 threads going on about PHP 5.2/5.3...
>
> CentOS tracks upstream whose version is...
> php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3
>
> If you want something newer, you have to go off the beaten path.
>
> try this...(as root)
> wget http://dev.centos.org/ce
For the 2 threads going on about PHP 5.2/5.3...
CentOS tracks upstream whose version is...
php-5.1.6-23.2.el5_3
If you want something newer, you have to go off the beaten path.
try this...(as root)
wget http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/CentOS-Testing.repo
mv CentOS-Testing.repo /etc/yum.repos.d
yu
11 matches
Mail list logo
