2009/3/21 John R Pierce :
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> HEAD / HEAD/1.1
>> Host: www.centos.org
>> HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
>
> its ...
>
> HEAD / HTML/1.1
>
> ... not HEAD/1.1
I typed it wrong. Here's the example John Pierce gave me:
HEAD / HTTP/1.1
Host: www.centos.org
__
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> HEAD / HEAD/1.1
> Host: www.centos.org
> HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
>
its ...
HEAD / HTML/1.1
... not HEAD/1.1
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2009/3/21 Scott Silva :
>
>> When I run the command "mtr -c 10 -r centos.org" I continue to see the
>> line which includes "???" and "100% loss" within the Layered Tech DC
>> in Dallas. I don't know what if anything that indicates. At the time
>> of the below test, I can load centos.org into my br
> When I run the command "mtr -c 10 -r centos.org" I continue to see the
> line which includes "???" and "100% loss" within the Layered Tech DC
> in Dallas. I don't know what if anything that indicates. At the time
> of the below test, I can load centos.org into my browser, without
> problems.
>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> $ telnet www.centos.org www
> Trying 72.232.194.162...
> Connected to www.centos.org (72.232.194.162).
> Escape character is '^]'.
> HEAD / HTTP/1.1
> Host: www.centos.org
>
> HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 04:08:16 GMT
> Server:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:04 AM, JohnS wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 23:57 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Question for you Lanny.
> Do you have any ones computer you can use beside yours in the same place
> (town and country) that you live?
> If so try to access the sight with it.
> Make sure it's
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 23:57 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Question: Do you have another command I can try from here? Thank you
> very much and good evening!
Question for you Lanny.
Do you have any ones computer you can use beside yours in the same place
(town and country) that you live?
If so try
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
The telnets into my 2 web sites in CT with the GET did result in me
seeing the HTML code, as the book shows.
>
> insufficient info on your GET, and you can't use any backspaces, you
> pretty much have to paste a perfect command...
>
> $ telne
Lanny:
> Ross: I have an old (2003) book about Network Troubleshooting. It
> shows an example of using Telnet to Port 80, to see what's happening.
> I just tried that, and assuming the CentOS server in Layered Tech is
> configured the same way, which is a huge assumption, it is not
> responding wit
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
I haven't even seen one try at showing a tcpdump or similar.
>
> Ross: I have an old (2003) book about Network Troubleshooting. It
> shows an example of using Telnet to Port 80, to see what's happening.
> I just tried that, and assuming
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Lanny Marcus
Probably this thread should die, until more people cannot
surf the site. That's what I'm getting, although I can ping it and
traceroute to it. As I said, it's an intermittent problem. L
On Mar 20, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Lanny Marcus
wrote:
> On 3/20/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>> On 3/20/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>>> Probably this thread should die, until more people cannot
>>> surf the site. That's what I'm getting, although I can ping it and
>>> tracero
On 3/20/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On 3/20/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> Probably this thread should die, until more people cannot
>> surf the site. That's what I'm getting, although I can ping it and
>> traceroute to it. As I said, it's an intermittent problem. Lanny
>
>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:07:03PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
> And all those plus the ones in the mails you and people before you sent do
> reach www.centos.org. What are you trying to prove here? Why is nobody talking
> to layered tech directly, if he/she cannot reach www.centos.org?
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 3/20/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Probably this thread should die, until more people cannot
> surf the site. That's what I'm getting, although I can ping it and
> traceroute to it. As I said, it's an intermittent problem. Lanny
I haven't even seen one try at showing a tc
On 3/20/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> John R. Dennison wrote:
>> > 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com 0.0% 13.9 13.1 12.6
And all those plus the ones in the mails you and people before you sent do
> reach www.centos.org. What are you trying to prove here? Why is nobody
> talking
> to
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 02:20:47PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
> mtr from Philadelphia, PA, Level-3 outbound:
>
> radagast.gerdesas.com Snt: 10Loss% Last Avg Best Wrst
> StDev
> . 0.0% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
> 0.0
John R. Dennison wrote:
> > 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com 0.0% 13.9 13.1 12.6
> > 13.9 0.4
> 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com 0.0% 38.6 38.5 38.3 38.7
> 0.1
> 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com0%10 10 30.75 31.11
> 31.43
> 162.194
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:48 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>
>>> I did some more pinging later on from one of my servers in San Jose,
>>> California, and saw some signs of route instability at layeredwhazza
>>> where the next hop after what sh
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>
>> I did some more pinging later on from one of my servers in San Jose,
>> California, and saw some signs of route instability at layeredwhazza
>> where the next hop after what should have been hte next-to-last one
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> I did some more pinging later on from one of my servers in San Jose,
> California, and saw some signs of route instability at layeredwhazza
> where the next hop after what should have been hte next-to-last one was
> coming from various route
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 01:58:13PM -0500, Robert wrote:
> Another data point. I'm on sbcglobal DSL near Dallas. (rcsntx is
> Richardson Texas, an adjacent suburb of Dallas.)
> Without further comment:
>
> [r...@mavis rj]# mtr -c 10 -r centos.org
> mavis.localdomain Snt: 10Lo
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 13:08 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>>
>> John: Then I believe the most important data we have are what you
>> found a few nights ago, and the traceroute Per did from Sweden this
>> morning (USA time) that died within the LayeredTech DC. Lanny
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 13:08 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
> John: Then I believe the most important data we have are what you
> found a few nights ago, and the traceroute Per did from Sweden this
> morning (USA time) that died within the LayeredTech DC. Lanny
Adding to the data, from here in Nor
On 3/20/09, John R Pierce wrote:
> Rainer Duffner wrote:
>> srv3# mtr -c 10 -r centos.org
>> HOST: srv3.ultra-secure.deLoss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst
> 'lost packets' on traces from intermediate hops aren't significant, as
> most routers treat PING as a low priority and if they are
Lanny Marcus schrieb:
> On 3/20/09, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> 2009/3/20 Tru Huynh :
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:02:46AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>>
ae_cw_10g.databank.com0.0% 111.6 113.6 110.7
126.5 4.8
pod22h_ae.layeredtech.com
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> srv3# mtr -c 10 -r centos.org
> HOST: srv3.ultra-secure.deLoss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
> ...
> 7. ae-92-92.csw4.Washington1.Le 0.0%10 98.6 102.3 97.0 110.3 5.0
> 8. ae-91-91.ebr1.Washington1.Le 50.0%10 101.8 103.6 98.6 109.8 4.1
>
On 3/20/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> Tru: I hope you will reopen the Trouble Ticket with Layered Tech,
>> again! With the mtr -c 10 -r centos.org command Rainer used from
>> Germany (which I used from here and posted results in previous
>> message) and the traceroute Per di
On 3/20/09, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> 2009/3/20 Tru Huynh :
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:02:46AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>> ae_cw_10g.databank.com0.0% 111.6 113.6 110.7
>>> 126.5 4.8
>>> pod22h_ae.layeredtech.com 0.0% 116.8 115.5 110.7
>>> 139.7 8.7
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Tru: I hope you will reopen the Trouble Ticket with Layered Tech,
> again! With the mtr -c 10 -r centos.org command Rainer used from
> Germany (which I used from here and posted results in previous
> message) and the traceroute Per did from Sweden, with my extremely
> limited
2009/3/20 Tru Huynh :
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:02:46AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> ae_cw_10g.databank.com 0.0% 111.6 113.6 110.7 126.5
>> 4.8
>> pod22h_ae.layeredtech.com 0.0% 116.8 115.5 110.7 139.7
>> 8.7
>> ???
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:02:46AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> ae_cw_10g.databank.com0.0% 111.6 113.6 110.7 126.5
> 4.8
> pod22h_ae.layeredtech.com 0.0% 116.8 115.5 110.7 139.7
> 8.7
> ??? 100.0 0.0 0.0
2009/3/19 Tru Huynh :
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:07:15PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> Russ: Same problem with the centos.org web site again from my end. I
>> did go to IRC, as you suggested, and sent a message to #centos-web
>> several minutes ago. Didn't see anyone else there. I hope someone wi
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Lanny Marcus schrieb:
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus
>> wrote:
>>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>>> webmast
>From Sweden it stops at layertech.com:
Viamac:~ per$ traceroute centos.org
traceroute to centos.org (72.232.194.162), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.99.99.1 (10.99.99.1) 1.257 ms 0.352 ms 0.356 ms
2 192.168.150.1 (192.168.150.1) 1.019 ms 1.159 ms 1.216 ms
3 212.247.10.238 (212.247.1
Lanny Marcus schrieb:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus
> wrote:
>
>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>> webmaster should happen to read this...
>>
>
> As I posted la
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
> webmaster should happen to read this...
As I posted late yesterday afternoon, the problem went away
2009/3/19 Tru Huynh :
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:07:15PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> Russ: Same problem with the centos.org web site again from my end. I
>> did go to IRC, as you suggested, and sent a message to #centos-web
>> several minutes ago. Didn't see anyone else there. I hope someone wi
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:07:15PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Russ: Same problem with the centos.org web site again from my end. I
> did go to IRC, as you suggested, and sent a message to #centos-web
> several minutes ago. Didn't see anyone else there. I hope someone will
> reopen the Trouble Tic
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>> webmaster should happen to read this...
>
> working fine
On 3/16/09, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
> webmaster should happen to read this...
They (Layered Tech or Level3) fixed the problem the other day. I have
been checkin
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:29 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>> webmaster should happen to read this...
>
> working fine
2009/3/17 Tru Huynh :
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:23:47AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Lanny Marcus
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech
>> >> and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pier
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:23:47AM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Lanny Marcus
> wrote:
>
> >> Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech
> >> and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pierces
> >> shows. But still I c
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:20 +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> JohnS wrote:
> > Something fishey going on here! You can send an email to @centos.org but
> > not www??
>
> Sure. The mailserver is nowhere near to the web server. Okay, same
> continent, but completely different DC.
>
> Ralph
Ahh, o
JohnS wrote:
> Something fishey going on here! You can send an email to @centos.org but
> not www??
Sure. The mailserver is nowhere near to the web server. Okay, same
continent, but completely different DC.
Ralph
pgpWxCQ2W0tYw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> Proxy Server that is anonymous. But doing another trace to layeredtech
>> and ltdomains shows bad hops also from my end just like John Pierces
>> shows. But still I can access it by WWW.
I sent an email to support AT layeredtech DOT com g
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:05 AM, JohnS wrote:
>> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> > Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my
>> > wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run
>> > into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in
>> > Colom
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:05 AM, JohnS wrote:
>> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> > Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my
>> > wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run
>> > into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in
>> > Colom
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my
>> wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run
>> into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in
>> Colomb
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my
> > wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run
> > into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in
> > Colombia. CentOS possibly has become the 2nd one. I hope
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 20:09 -0300, Marcelo Roccasalva wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > Lanny Marcus wrote:
> [...]
> > 17 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 48.485
> > ms !X 49.041 ms !X 48.281 ms !X
>
> As man traceroute states, "!
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Had a suggestion I try to get a different IP from our ISP and if my
> wife isn't surfing now, I will try that.. Until today, I have only run
> into one (1) web site that won't let me on, because my IP is in
> Colombia. CentOS possibly has become the 2nd one. I hope not!
>
2009/3/16 Victor Padro :
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Lanny Marcus
>> >> >>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but
>> >> >>> the
>> >> >>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>> >> >>> webmaster should happen to read this...
>> >> >
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> That's good to know. I seem to recall, years ago, they were installing
>> a Submarine cable to the USA.
>>
>> Do you see anything in the traceroute that shows where the problem is?
>> It still won't load for me. I can s
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:04 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce
> wrote:
> >> > Lanny Marcus wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, La
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:45 PM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:04 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> > Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> The web site for CentOS is no
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Marcelo Roccasalva
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> Lanny Marcus wrote:
> [...]
>> 17 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 48.485
>> ms !X 49.041 ms !X 48.281 ms !X
>
> As man traceroute states, "!X" is
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
[...]
> 17 162.194.232.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.232.194.162) 48.485
> ms !X 49.041 ms !X 48.281 ms !X
As man traceroute states, "!X" is communication administratively
prohibited... I think they're blocking
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> That's good to know. I seem to recall, years ago, they were installing
> a Submarine cable to the USA.
>
> Do you see anything in the traceroute that shows where the problem is?
> It still won't load for me. I can see when it does the DNS lookup and
> after that the browser st
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:04 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > Lanny Marcus wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
> >>> web site i
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>>> webmaste
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus
> wrote:
>
>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>> webmaster should happen to read this...
>>
>>
> I know it is wo
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
> webmaster should happen to read this...
>
I know it is working for everyone else. Below is the tracer
On 3/16/09, Flaherty, Patrick wrote:
> Always useful to check with:
> http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/
> http://internetpulse.net/
> http://just-ping.com
>
> Before reporting connectivity problems.
Cool Pat. I'd never heard of any of those sites before. Thanks. I
clicked on your first link,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
> webmaster should happen to read this...
working fine here, and from two other test locations -- it
might make mo
On 3/16/09, John R Pierce wrote:
> R P Herrold wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>>> webmaster should happen to read this...
>>
>> worki
ny Marcus
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 1:39 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: centos.org web site not responding
>
> On 3/16/09, R P Herrold wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> >> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I ca
R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>
>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>> webmaster should happen to read this...
>>
>
> working fine here, and from two
On 3/16/09, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
>> web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
>> webmaster should happen to read this...
>
> working fine here, and from two ot
The web site for CentOS is not responding. I can ping it OK, but the
web site is not responding to http requests from my browser. If the
webmaster should happen to read this...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/list
71 matches
Mail list logo
