On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Chris Geldenhuis
> wrote:
> >
> > The records that Richard was talking about was not that of your actual
> > mail, but the Domain Name Service (DNS) records required to find the
> > destination server and for
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Chris Geldenhuis
wrote:
>
> The records that Richard was talking about was not that of your actual
> mail, but the Domain Name Service (DNS) records required to find the
> destination server and for that server to look up your server to verify
> that the mail comes
Susan Day wrote:
> With regard to Richard's comments, I will get in touch with my server
> farm (or garden, small company) that handles the same.
>
> Regarding Simon's comments, these DNS packets have got to be teeny
> tiny. This is plain text and very little of that. Your response was
> full of
With regard to Richard's comments, I will get in touch with my server farm
(or garden, small company) that handles the same.
Regarding Simon's comments, these DNS packets have got to be teeny tiny.
This is plain text and very little of that. Your response was full of terms
I didn't understand and
Simon Billis sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
Just to correct something I wrote:
> Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
>
>> Here are what the logs have to say:
>>
>> @40004bf6cfc4383bc65c delivery 6217: deferral:
>> CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ @40004bf6cfc4383c5eb4
>> s
Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
> Here are what the logs have to say:
>
> @40004bf6cfc4383bc65c delivery 6217: deferral:
> CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/ @40004bf6cfc4383c5eb4
> status: local 0/10 remote 0/255 @40004bf6d51e34d61d8c starting
> delivery 6218: msg 97
Replies to all replies:
Richard asks:
> is the "domain you control" on the same machine as the form
> submission site?
Yes.
> was this machine recently upgraded to 5.5?
> [the 5.5 upgrade included sendmail and as a
> result could have had an impact on your sendmail.cf
> (depending on what
> Do you know that it's going out with valid headers, a "legal" helo
> address,
> and the like? Many mail systems will use these as reasons to reject
> connections when they're wrong. In the case of bad helo values, often it
> won't get as far as the spam filter, since that's sent through before th
You might want to run your MTA's ip address through a blacklist checker.
Also, do you use srv records? Has anything here changed?
I've found that when it comes to email, its quite plausible for your system to
break because of an external party, for example, do you use the relay of your
ISP? If
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, wrote:
>> I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I
>> send
>> an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can receive the
>> email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to, for example, this
>> gmail account,
Do you know that it's going out with valid headers, a "legal" helo address,
and the like? Many mail systems will use these as reasons to reject
connections when they're wrong. In the case of bad helo values, often it
won't get as far as the spam filter, since that's sent through before the
message.
Susan,
Susan wrote:
> I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I
> send
> an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can receive the
> email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to, for example, this
> gmail account, I never get it. It's not ev
Susan Day sent a missive on 2010-05-21:
> Hi;
> I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I
> send an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can
> receive the email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to,
> for example, this gmail account, I
Hi;
I have an email form that worked fine until now. For some reason, if I send
an email to an email address at a domain that I control, I can receive the
email TTW no problem. However, if I try and push it to, for example, this
gmail account, I never get it. It's not even in the spam filter. What
14 matches
Mail list logo
