Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
> Christoph Maser schrieb:
>> Am Mittwoch, den 21.10.2009, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Yves Bellefeuille:
it will work when your mirror has 5.4
>>> I have the same problem. Are many mirrors not updated yet?
>> Was there an official CentOS 5.4 announcemnet already?
Christoph Maser schrieb:
> Am Mittwoch, den 21.10.2009, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Yves Bellefeuille:
>>> it will work when your mirror has 5.4
>> I have the same problem. Are many mirrors not updated yet?
>
> Was there an official CentOS 5.4 announcemnet already?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/cento
Am Mittwoch, den 21.10.2009, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Yves Bellefeuille:
> > it will work when your mirror has 5.4
>
> I have the same problem. Are many mirrors not updated yet?
Was there an official CentOS 5.4 announcemnet already?
financial.com AG
Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Mathew S. McCarrell
> wrote:
> > Updating your repo file like this is a very bad idea. You would be
> better
> > off waiting for the mirrorlist.txt file to update instead of causing
> > yourself more headaches
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
> Updating your repo file like this is a very bad idea. You would be better
> off waiting for the mirrorlist.txt file to update instead of causing
> yourself more headaches in the long run.
In my case I use all my own internal mirrors s
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 October 2009 21:16, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
>
> > That is a bit strange. I would have expected the links to be
> > http://server/centos/*5*/blahblah instead of having 5.3. Is
> > your /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo has this:
> >
> > #released updates
> > [updates]
> > name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates
> > mirrorlist=
> http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=updates
> > #baseurl=http://mirr
> /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo has this:
>
> #released updates
> [updates]
> name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates
> mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=updates
> #baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/$basearch/
> gpgcheck=1
> ena
>> http://www.muug.mb.ca/pub/centos/5.3/updates/i386/
Look ma, no hands!
http://www.muug.mb.ca/pub/centos/5.4/updates/i386/
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
CentO
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 21:16, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
> That is a bit strange. I would have expected the links to be
> http://server/centos/*5*/blahblah instead of having 5.3. Is
> your /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo still the original version or
> has someone customized it to look at
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 October 2009 18:01, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Yves Bellefeuille
> wrote:
> >
> > > I have the same problem. Are many mirrors not updated yet?
> >
> > Many of them should be current
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 18:01, Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Yves Bellefeuille
wrote:
>
> > I have the same problem. Are many mirrors not updated yet?
>
> Many of them should be current since the official release just
> occurred. I've already seen 25 Mbps jum
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> > it will work when your mirror has 5.4
>
> I have the same problem. Are many mirrors not updated yet?
>
Many of them should be current since the official release just occurred.
I've already seen 25 Mbps jump in traffic on the Clarkson
> it will work when your mirror has 5.4
I have the same problem. Are many mirrors not updated yet?
--
Yves Bellefeuille
"Yves Bellefeuille: Eterna malvenkanto en UEA" -- Heroldo Komunikas,
n-ro 389
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://li
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 16:31:13 Alan McKay wrote:
> > it will work when your mirror has 5.4
>
> ahhh, OK. What if my mirror is the same box? Will that work too?
> I cannot see any reason from here why it would not.
>
> I keep a local mirror on my desktop (the box in question) and am just
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Matt wrote:
> Just curious, why the move from Debian to CentOS?
There is very little in the way of technical reasoning for it. Mostly it
was a call by those in charge.
We still have several servers running Debian doing various network
related tasks. DNS and mai
Alan McKay wrote:
>> it will work when your mirror has 5.4
>
> ahhh, OK. What if my mirror is the same box? Will that work too?
> I cannot see any reason from here why it would not.
>
> I keep a local mirror on my desktop (the box in question) and am just
> bringing down 5.4 now, with rsync
> it will work when your mirror has 5.4
ahhh, OK. What if my mirror is the same box? Will that work too?
I cannot see any reason from here why it would not.
I keep a local mirror on my desktop (the box in question) and am just
bringing down 5.4 now, with rsync
thanks,
-Alan
--
“Don't eat
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 14:46:05 Robert Heller wrote:
> Yes. Generally, doing yum update or yum upgrade will pick up new point
> releases as they become available. *Sometimes* you need to do something
> special (the 5.2 to 5.3 update required an upgrade of glibc on its own
> before the main
Alan McKay wrote:
> OK, I've never done an upgrade before either, so I go to this URL :
>
>> http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4/#head-29511ff6659f6463d444feb92326ed2232fc8c08
>
> And I execute these commands
>
> yum clean all
> yum update glibc\*
> yum update yum\* rpm\* pytho
OK, I've never done an upgrade before either, so I go to this URL :
> http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS5.4/#head-29511ff6659f6463d444feb92326ed2232fc8c08
And I execute these commands
yum clean all
yum update glibc\*
yum update yum\* rpm\* python\*
yum clean all
yum update
shutdo
> Hi there folks. I've been watching the never ending "CentOS 5.4 OMG
> WHEN?" threads for the last few days / weeks and had a question. I'm
> pretty new to anything rpm based. I used Red Hat 9 back in college,
> but that's about it. Currently, I do have a few Cent OS servers and
> we're slowly
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Jonathan Moore
wrote:
> Thanks for the input folks. I think I see now that it's going to be a
> pretty easy going process, and I don't need to screw around with crazy
> update processes. Very good to know.
The documentation here should apply to some extent:
h
Thanks for the input folks. I think I see now that it's going to be a
pretty easy going process, and I don't need to screw around with crazy
update processes. Very good to know.
-jonathan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.or
>Fedora does not have 'point releases'.
Right...
>One does a 'fresh' re-install every 6 months to a year (or something like
>that).
Well, not quite. Although it being what it is and sometimes breaking, you
can yum upgrade it[1], but the suggested method involves using anaconda to
upgrade it, wh
At Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:25:53 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hi there folks. I've been watching the never ending "CentOS 5.4 OMG
> WHEN?" threads for the last few days / weeks and had a question. I'm
> pretty new to anything rpm based. I used Red Hat 9 back in college,
> but that's abou
Jonathan Moore wrote:
> Hi there folks. I've been watching the never ending "CentOS 5.4 OMG
> WHEN?" threads for the last few days / weeks and had a question. I'm
> pretty new to anything rpm based. I used Red Hat 9 back in college,
> but that's about it. Currently, I do have a few Cent OS serv
Hi there folks. I've been watching the never ending "CentOS 5.4 OMG
WHEN?" threads for the last few days / weeks and had a question. I'm
pretty new to anything rpm based. I used Red Hat 9 back in college,
but that's about it. Currently, I do have a few Cent OS servers and
we're slowly migrating
28 matches
Mail list logo
