Re: [CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes [SOLVED]

2007-08-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Les Mikesell wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: Aug 5 14:10:08 sunspot named[5263]: dumping master file: /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/tmp-sTsIWElBLR: open: file not found Thanks, Craig. That sure made sense to do, but seemingly not the crux

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes

2007-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: Aug 5 14:10:08 sunspot named[5263]: dumping master file: /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/tmp-sTsIWElBLR: open: file not found Thanks, Craig. That sure made sense to do, but seemingly not the crux of the issue. If

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes

2007-08-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: +++ So the new BIND sees the conf file and recognizes that there are 169 zones (test group) to pull. nothing comes over. I tailed the /var/log/messages and I see about 169 of these: Aug 5 14:10:08 sunspot named[5263]: dumping master file: /v

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes

2007-08-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Les Mikesell wrote: Ray Leventhal wrote: Aug 5 14:10:08 sunspot named[5263]: dumping master file: /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/tmp-sTsIWElBLR: open: file not found Thanks, Craig. That sure made sense to do, but seemingly not the crux of the issue. If named is running chroot, s

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes

2007-08-05 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 8/5/07, Ray Leventhal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've put my new DNS server in place, told the primary that this IP would > be pulling zones and restarted BIND on the primary. > > I configured my named.conf file to pull zones from the primary, started > BIND on the new box. Her

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes

2007-08-05 Thread Les Mikesell
Ray Leventhal wrote: Aug 5 14:10:08 sunspot named[5263]: dumping master file: /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/tmp-sTsIWElBLR: open: file not found Thanks, Craig. That sure made sense to do, but seemingly not the crux of the issue. If named is running chroot, shouldn't the files be

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes

2007-08-05 Thread Ray Leventhal
Craig White wrote: > On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 18:07 -0400, Ray Leventhal wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I've put my new DNS server in place, told the primary that this IP would >> be pulling zones and restarted BIND on the primary. >> >> >> >> So the new BIND sees the conf file and recognizes that th

Re: [CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes

2007-08-05 Thread Craig White
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 18:07 -0400, Ray Leventhal wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've put my new DNS server in place, told the primary that this IP would > be pulling zones and restarted BIND on the primary. > > I configured my named.conf file to pull zones from the primary, started > BIND on the new box.

[CentOS] New CentOS DNS Server woes

2007-08-05 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi folks, I've put my new DNS server in place, told the primary that this IP would be pulling zones and restarted BIND on the primary. I configured my named.conf file to pull zones from the primary, started BIND on the new box. Here's where I get confused [EMAIL PROTEC