On 01/27/2016 02:12 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
In C7 i have no idea
In C7, "-g" appears to be an argument to ntpd, by default.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
In article <56a88188.6070...@hogranch.com>,
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/27/2016 12:25 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote:
> > I'm tempted to stick an "ntpdate -u ..." in the crontab to force
> > time-synch, but I don't see why that's needed if ntpd service should
> > already be fulfilling that purpose.
>
On 27 January 2016 at 08:53, Dirk Deimeke wrote:
> On 2016-01-27 09:36, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> ntpd won't make drastic changes in the time, if its too far off. its
>> designed to stabilize the clock by making small changes in speeding it
>> up or slowing it down, and not 'staircase' set
On 2016-01-27 09:36, John R Pierce wrote:
Hi!
ntpd won't make drastic changes in the time, if its too far off. its
designed to stabilize the clock by making small changes in speeding it
up or slowing it down, and not 'staircase' setting it absolutely.
http://www.ntp.org/ntpfaq/NTP-s-algo.htm#
On 27 January 2016 at 08:36, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/27/2016 12:25 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote:
>>
>> I'm tempted to stick an "ntpdate -u ..." in the crontab to force
>> time-synch, but I don't see why that's needed if ntpd service should
>> already be fulfilling that purpose.
>
>
>
> ntpd won't
On 1/27/2016 12:25 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote:
I'm tempted to stick an "ntpdate -u ..." in the crontab to force
time-synch, but I don't see why that's needed if ntpd service should
already be fulfilling that purpose.
ntpd won't make drastic changes in the time, if its too far off. its
designed
Hi List
I have ntp running as a service on a PC, with the expectation that it
would keep time in synch to my ntp server.
However, while I can manually update the time using "ntpdate -u ...",
I find that if I manually force the wrong time, the ntpd service does
not automatically re-synch the sys
On 20.12.2014 03:42, listmail wrote:
> I just saw this:
>
> https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-353-01
>
> which includes this:
> " A remote attacker can send a carefully crafted packet that can overflow a
> stack buffer and potentially allow malicious code to be executed with the
> p
C7 -
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-December/020850.html
C6 -
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-December/020852.html
C5 -
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-December/020851.html
On 20/12/14 14:04, Eero Volotinen wrote:
fixed in:
fixed in:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-2025.html
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-2024.html
maybe it's soon in centos too..
2014-12-20 4:42 GMT+02:00 listmail :
> I just saw this:
>
> https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-353-01
>
> which includes this:
> " A remote
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-9295
2014-12-20 4:42 GMT+02:00 listmail :
> I just saw this:
>
> https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-353-01
>
> which includes this:
> " A remote attacker can send a carefully crafted packet that can overflow a
> stack buffer and potenti
I just saw this:
https://ics-cert.us-cert.gov/advisories/ICSA-14-353-01
which includes this:
" A remote attacker can send a carefully crafted packet that can overflow a
stack buffer and potentially allow malicious code to be executed with the
privilege level of the ntpd process. All NTP4 releases
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 07:31, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>>
>>
>> The first time (16:39:13.653674) client cannot sync to the server but
>> second time (16:39:43.145984) that was successful even if there is a
>> 'bad udp cksum'. BTW, is it normal? Tcpdump
On 04/09/2012 07:31, Artifex Maximus wrote:
The first time (16:39:13.653674) client cannot sync to the server but
second time (16:39:43.145984) that was successful even if there is a
'bad udp cksum'. BTW, is it normal? Tcpdump says there was traffic and
sync happened later so rule is OK I think.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 15:18, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
>>>
>>> The iptables rules
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 14:18 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> My server is able to synchronize with GPSNTP so rules
> are fine for that (because my output chain is ACCEPT per default).
And related traffic is allowed too, yes, I overlooked that.
Are you sure your windows clients have addresses in th
On 03/09/2012 15:18, Artifex Maximus wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your "proxy" ntp ser
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>> Any idea what is wrong?
>
> The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
> network access to your "proxy" ntp server. However, you do not specify
> any
On 03/09/2012 13:00, Philippe Naudin wrote:
Le lun. 03 sept. 2012 13:15:41 CEST, Leonard den Ottolander a écrit:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your "proxy" n
Le lun. 03 sept. 2012 13:15:41 CEST, Leonard den Ottolander a écrit:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> > Any idea what is wrong?
>
> The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
> network access to your "proxy" ntp server. However, you do not speci
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your "proxy" ntp server. However, you do not specify
any rules for eth1 to allow that ntp server to synchronise with the
remote se
On 2.9.2012 18:22, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Markus Falb
> wrote:
>> On 2.9.2012 09:46, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
>>> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on.
...
>>> The script for making f
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 2.9.2012 09:46, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
>> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
>> port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards. One for i
On 2.9.2012 09:46, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
> port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards. One for internal network and one
> for access internet. Both cards
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Earl Ramirez wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
>> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
>> port 123 UDP. I have two NIC
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
> port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards. One for internal network and one
> for access inter
Hello!
I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards. One for internal network and one
for access internet. Both cards in private address range. The problem
is when I am usi
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 12:21:54PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I cannot find anything in the logs that explain what is happening to
> me. The evidence I have indicates that when the host kvm system is
> powered off and restarted then the guests do not restart. This
> behaviour is at variance
On Mon, May 28, 2012 10:10, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On 5/28/2012 9:59 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 08:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 28.05.2012 14:41, schrieb James B. Byrne:
when power returned all of the restored guests were immediately
shutdown by ntp because th
On 5/28/2012 9:59 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 08:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 28.05.2012 14:41, schrieb James B. Byrne:
>>> when power returned all of the restored guests were immediately
>>> shutdown by ntp because the time differential between the
>>> restored systems an
On Mon, May 28, 2012 08:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 28.05.2012 14:41, schrieb James B. Byrne:
>> when power returned all of the restored guests were immediately
>> shutdown by ntp because the time differential between the
>> restored systems and that of the ntpd sync servers exceeded
>> the
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:41 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> We encountered a problem with respect to KVM virtual host restore and
> NTP. Specifically, our VM test host was shutdown by an extended power
> outage and when power returned all of the restored guests were
> immediately shutdown by ntp beca
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:41:30AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
> We encountered a problem with respect to KVM virtual host restore and
> NTP. Specifically, our VM test host was shutdown by an extended power
> outage and when power returned all of the restored guests were
> immediately shutdown by
We encountered a problem with respect to KVM virtual host restore and
NTP. Specifically, our VM test host was shutdown by an extended power
outage and when power returned all of the restored guests were
immediately shutdown by ntp because the time differential between the
restored systems and that
>>
> [root@proxy1 squid]# netstat -npl | grep ntp
> udp0 0 172.21.0.2:123 0.0.0.0:*
> 1154/ntpd
> udp0 0 127.0.0.1:123 0.0.0.0:*
> 1154/ntpd
> udp0 0 0.0.0.0:123 0.0.0.0:*
>
On 2012-05-16 13:19, Shiv. NK wrote:
> Hello Dear Friends,
>
> it is CentOS Release 6.2, ntpd is running but do not see bounded to
> the
> port udp:123
>
> any guidelines would be very much appreciable.
>
> [root@jet mavi]# netstat -ntlp | grep ntpd
>
>
>
> [root@jet mavi]# netstat -ntl | grep 12
Hello Dear Friends,
it is CentOS Release 6.2, ntpd is running but do not see bounded to the
port udp:123
any guidelines would be very much appreciable.
[root@jet mavi]# netstat -ntlp | grep ntpd
[root@jet mavi]# netstat -ntl | grep 123
But the service is running -
[root@jet mavi]# /etc/i
Seems like a well thought out and thorough explanation of how to do what
you're looking for.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579418
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> Try setting it like this:
>
>fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10
>server 127.127.1.0 prefer
>
>
Bowie
That did not work either.
jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Jerry Geis wrote:
>> You can get an assortment of devices that receive time signals from
>> satellites to act as good authoritative time sources on your private
>> network if you are willing to spend some money. If you just want to
>> fake it, I think the trick is to lower the stratum number in
>
> You can get an assortment of devices that receive time signals from
> satellites to act as good authoritative time sources on your private
> network if you are willing to spend some money. If you just want to
> fake it, I think the trick is to lower the stratum number in the 'fudge'
> sett
On 7/1/2010 9:28 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have a need to run a centos server CUT-off from any connected network.
> So the NTP server that is running on this very small network cannot
> connect to
> any other site to do what NTP does.
>
> however, I have devices on this small network that I wish to
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 10:51 -0400, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis
> > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:28 AM
> > To: CentOS ML
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:28 AM
> To: CentOS ML
> Subject: [CentOS] ntp server
>
> I have a need to run a centos server CUT-off from
I have a need to run a centos server CUT-off from any connected network.
So the NTP server that is running on this very small network cannot
connect to
any other site to do what NTP does.
however, I have devices on this small network that I wish to use the
centos server
as the time source and ru
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 18/12/09 13:11, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> That was for CentOS-4. The update for CentOS-5 is indeed unavailable
>> as of today.
>
> ntp and conga should both be available at some point today. I need to
> run some tests first, lets see if I can get those d
On 18/12/09 13:11, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> That was for CentOS-4. The update for CentOS-5 is indeed unavailable
> as of today.
ntp and conga should both be available at some point today. I need to
run some tests first, lets see if I can get those done during my lunch
break at work.
- KB
__
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 06:42 +0100 schrieb Gilbert Sebenste:
>> Excellent. We're all caught up on updates now, except...
>>
>> I didn't see the NTP update. That's a big one, with an easy denial of
>> sservice attack. Is that planning
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2009, 06:42 +0100 schrieb Gilbert Sebenste:
> Excellent. We're all caught up on updates now, except...
>
> I didn't see the NTP update. That's a big one, with an easy denial of
> sservice attack. Is that planning to be released? I know there was an
> issue with it for awhile..
Excellent. We're all caught up on updates now, except...
I didn't see the NTP update. That's a big one, with an easy denial of
sservice attack. Is that planning to be released? I know there was an
issue with it for awhile...
**
thanks guys I'm seeing is not so hard.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Lindemann"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NTP
> Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:16:45AM -0
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:16:45AM -0500, Davy Leon wrote:
>> I have a Centos 5.3. I'm wondering how can I make this linux box to
>> act as a time server for my small network. I just need this Centos
>> PC act as a time reference for the other PCs so they can keep the
>> ti
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:16:45AM -0500, Davy Leon wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I have a Centos 5.3. I'm wondering how can I make this linux box to
> act as a time server for my small network. I just need this Centos
> PC act as a time reference for the other PCs so they can keep the
> time exact the s
Hi folks
I have a Centos 5.3. I'm wondering how can I make this linux box to act as a
time server for my small network.
I just need this Centos PC act as a time reference for the other PCs so they
can keep the time exact the same as the Centos server. Don;t need to syncronize
the server with t
Akemi Yagi wrote:
>You may want to check upon this CentOS bug report:
>
>http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4060
Which has been closed as 'no change required'. Some change is required.
As things stand my systems are on version 4.2.0.a.20040617-8.el4_8.2,
the CentOS name for the August update. T
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Ron Yorston wrote:
> I noticed that although I'd fetched the latest update to ntp from the
> mirror it wasn't being installed.
>
> It seems that the version numbers have got out of step. According to
> the changelog the update that was released in August should ha
I noticed that although I'd fetched the latest update to ntp from the
mirror it wasn't being installed.
It seems that the version numbers have got out of step. According to
the changelog the update that was released in August should have had
the version number 4.2.0.a.20040617-8.el4_7.2, whereas
Tom Brown writes:
>
> Hi
>
> On 5.3 i have a situation where some boxes have been 3 or 4 seconds out
> and restarting ntpd has fixed the issue.
>
> What i dont understand is why the clocks did not drift to the correct
> time when the config seems correct in that restarting ntp did correct
>
> Is the directory /var/lib/ntp present, and with write permissions for
> the 'ntp' user? Does the drift file exist?
> Does ntpd ever lock in? What do you see in 'ntpq -p' over time?
> Are these heavily-loaded boxes, or boxes with wildly-varying loads?
>
>
$ ll /var/lib/ntp
total 4
-rw-r--r-
Tom Brown wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 5.3 i have a situation where some boxes have been 3 or 4 seconds out
> and restarting ntpd has fixed the issue.
>
> What i dont understand is why the clocks did not drift to the correct
> time when the config seems correct in that restarting ntp did correct
> the tim
Hi
On 5.3 i have a situation where some boxes have been 3 or 4 seconds out
and restarting ntpd has fixed the issue.
What i dont understand is why the clocks did not drift to the correct
time when the config seems correct in that restarting ntp did correct
the time.
Is there something 'special
Not knowing what country your from but at a U.S. taxpayer I have no
reservations about using time.nist.gov myself, some people think it's
rude to directly query stratum 1 servers.
I typically have 2-3 NTP servers per location behind a load balancer and
my internal servers sync against the load b
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 18:36 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
> >>
> > If there are other interfaces available, FreeBSD does well as a timeserver
> > with SOME GPS receivers. But if it is working OK, I would just leave it
> > running unless the hardw
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
>>
> If there are other interfaces available, FreeBSD does well as a timeserver
> with SOME GPS receivers. But if it is working OK, I would just leave it
> running unless the hardware is going south.
>
It's not so much that the hardware is curren
on 7-21-2009 12:29 PM Andy Harrison spake the following:
> Currently, my time server is a Sun v240 with a 32-pci gps card (with a
> proprietary Solaris driver) attached to our gps receiver via an sma
> cable up to the roof of my building. As I'm migrating almost all of
> our Solaris servers and se
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:16 PM, nate wrote:
>
> Not knowing what country your from but at a U.S. taxpayer I have
> no reservations about using time.nist.gov myself, some people
> think it's rude to directly query stratum 1 servers.
My server already is a stratum 1 time server. I use other extern
Andy Harrison wrote:
> Currently, my time server is a Sun v240 with a 32-pci gps card (with a
> proprietary Solaris driver) attached to our gps receiver via an sma
> cable up to the roof of my building. As I'm migrating almost all of
> our Solaris servers and services over to CentOS, I'd like to k
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Since we don't have any pressing need for a high-precision time source,
> we just sync our main server to the public ntp.org pool and then have
> everything else in the building sync to the main server.
>
We do have a pressing need for high-pr
Andy Harrison wrote:
> Currently, my time server is a Sun v240 with a 32-pci gps card (with a
> proprietary Solaris driver) attached to our gps receiver via an sma
> cable up to the roof of my building. As I'm migrating almost all of
> our Solaris servers and services over to CentOS, I'd like to k
Currently, my time server is a Sun v240 with a 32-pci gps card (with a
proprietary Solaris driver) attached to our gps receiver via an sma
cable up to the roof of my building. As I'm migrating almost all of
our Solaris servers and services over to CentOS, I'd like to know what
other people are usi
> Mar 15 14:28:15 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument
> Mar 15 14:45:22 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument
> Mar 15 15:02:29 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument
i remember (or think so) i had this some time ago on one of my machines.
Thanks. You are right. I did NOT reboot after change Ip address. It is
correct now.
--- 09/3/15 (日)，Filipe Brandenburger 寫道：
> 寄件者: Filipe Brandenburger
> 主旨: Re: [CentOS] NTP error message on /var/log/messages
> 收件者: "CentOS mailing list"
> 日期: 2009 3 15 日 下午 7:3
Hi,
2009/3/15 mcclnx mcc :
> I just setup CENTOS 4.7 with latest patches on DELL server.
> I also configured NTP point to out time server. I found
> /var/log/messages file every 20 to 30 minutes will generate
> a error message :
> Mar 15 14:28:15 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid a
On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:22, mcclnx mcc wrote:
> I just setup CENTOS 4.7 with latest patches on DELL server. I also
> configured NTP point to out time server. I found /var/log/messages file
> every 20 to 30 minutes will generate a error message :
>
> Mar 15 14:28:15 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(
mcclnx mcc wrote:
> I just setup CENTOS 4.7 with latest patches on DELL server. I also
> configured NTP point to out time server. I found /var/log/messages file
> every 20 to 30 minutes will generate a error message :
>
> Mar 15 14:28:15 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument
I just setup CENTOS 4.7 with latest patches on DELL server. I also configured
NTP point to out time server. I found /var/log/messages file every 20 to 30
minutes will generate a error message :
Mar 15 14:28:15 SER1 ntpd[25037]: sendto(172.29.21.16): Invalid argument
Mar 15 14:45:22 SER1 ntpd[
On Saturday 15 November 2008 14:19:12 Dirk H. Schulz wrote:
> Anne,
>
> please check your /etc/ntp.conf for the "server" statement; CentOS original
> is
>
> > server 0.rhel.pool.ntp.org
> > server 1.rhel.pool.ntp.org
> > server 2.rhel.pool.ntp.org
>
My config file says
server 0.centos.pool.ntp.org
On Saturday 15 November 2008 14:13:44 Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 November 2008 10:41:14 Olaf Mueller wrote:
> >> Anne Wilson wrote:
> >
> > No, the server is on a fixed IP, internally and externally.
>
> Ok, here is my config file, hope this helps.
> There was an op
Anne,
please check your /etc/ntp.conf for the "server" statement; CentOS original
is
server 0.rhel.pool.ntp.org
server 1.rhel.pool.ntp.org
server 2.rhel.pool.ntp.org
These 2 server ips you listed do not belong to this pool (you can check via
dns), and resolved backwardly their names do not s
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Saturday 15 November 2008 10:41:14 Olaf Mueller wrote:
>> Anne Wilson wrote:
> No, the server is on a fixed IP, internally and externally.
Ok, here is my config file, hope this helps.
There was an option in the 'restrict default' line that I had to remove
for working proper
On Saturday 15 November 2008 10:41:14 Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> > **Unmatched Entries**
> >sendto(193.6.222.20) (fd=21): Invalid argument: 1 time(s)
> >sendto(141.89.226.2) (fd=21): Invalid argument: 1 time(s)
> >
> > Does this mean that ntp is failing? I ass
Anne Wilson wrote:
Hello.
> **Unmatched Entries**
>sendto(193.6.222.20) (fd=21): Invalid argument: 1 time(s)
>sendto(141.89.226.2) (fd=21): Invalid argument: 1 time(s)
>
> Does this mean that ntp is failing? I assume so, and if so, how do I
> change the sources to something that will w
My server is supposed to be using ntp, with nothing changed from the defaults
set up by CentOS5. However, daily I see log entries like
Total synchronizations 2 (hosts: 2)
**Unmatched Entries**
sendto(193.6.222.20) (fd=21): Invalid argument: 1 time(s)
sendto(141.89.226.2) (fd=21): Inval
Scott Ehrlich schrieb:
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows
XP with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate
with it via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the
Windows Firewall. The C5 system does not have any firewall enable
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 13:49 -0700, Jason Ross wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 11:43 -0800, James D. Parra wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Scott Ehrlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:37 AM
> > To: centos@centos.org
>
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows
> XP with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate
> with it via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the
> Windows Firewall. The C5 system does not have any firewall enab
: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] NTP server
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows XP
with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate with it
via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the Windows
Firewall. The C5 system does not have
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 11:43 -0800, James D. Parra wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ehrlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:37 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] NTP server
>
>
> I have a Centos 5 64-bit ser
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ehrlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:37 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] NTP server
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows XP
with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows XP
with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate with it
via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the Windows
Firewall. The C5 system does not have any firewall enabled.
Other C5 workstatio
--Original Message-
> From: Nicolas Sahlqvist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 8:36 AM
> To: Engineer, Gaurav
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] ntp queries not being answered
>
> Hi Gaurav,
>
> You can check the output of "iptables -L -n" or use
On Nov 20, 2007 2:05 PM, Engineer, Gaurav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> My name is Gaurav, and I am tasked with configuring a linux box with NTP.
>
> I am having a problem that I hope you can help me with.
>
> We have installed CentOS V5 on 1 processor down in the lab. The
Hello All,
My name is Gaurav, and I am tasked with configuring a linux box with
NTP.
I am having a problem that I hope you can help me with.
We have installed CentOS V5 on 1 processor down in the lab. The rest of
the processors on the network are AIX boxes versions 3.2.5 and 5.2. I
worked thro
93 matches
Mail list logo
