Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
>> From: John R Pierce
>> On 11/12/10 12:21 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> > that sounds quite likely. some of those modules have two banks on
>>> > the single module, and I seriously dou
Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>>
>>
>> May I recommend looking at the docs that tell you what order the DIMMs
>> need to be put into the board in? If you've got four slots, for example,
>> I'll bet that it's 1 and 2, then 3 and 4, or
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
>
>
>
> May I recommend looking at the docs that tell you what order the DIMMs
> need to be put into the board in? If yo
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list
From: John R Pierce
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
On 11/12/10 12:21 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
> that sounds quite likely. some of those modules have two banks on
On 11/12/10 12:21 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
that sounds quite likely. some of those modules have two banks on the
single module, and I seriously doubt a system is going to like a single
bank and a dual bank module in a dual channel environment.
I got in
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, John R Pierce wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: John R Pierce
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
>
> On 11/12/10 10:46 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>
>> I have a sneaking suspicion that it's the mismatched low and
>>
On 11/12/10 10:46 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
> I have a sneaking suspicion that it's the mismatched low and
> high density memory modules that are the problem?
that sounds quite likely.some of those modules have two banks on the
single module, and I seriously doubt a system is going to like a
> Tested each memory module in DDR1 slot for at least 20
> hours.
>
> Tested each slot with the 512MB module for another 20 hours.
> Should I have used the 1GB module for this?
So it appears that each memory module works fine if it's the
only module installed - in whatever slot.
I found this he
>> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Bob McConnell wrote:
>>
>> _snip_
>>
>>> And make sure you button the cabinet back up, with all covers in place
>>> and put it back on the rack where it normally sits. Running this test
>>> with the case open or sitting in free air is a waste of time unless that
>>> is how th
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Keith Roberts
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
>
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Bob McConnell wrote:
>
> _snip_
>
>> And make sure you button the cabinet back up, with all covers in p
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Bob McConnell wrote:
_snip_
> And make sure you button the cabinet back up, with all covers in place
> and put it back on the rack where it normally sits. Running this test
> with the case open or sitting in free air is a waste of time unless that
> is how the system usually o
Bob McConnell wrote:
> Jake Shipton wrote:
> > Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >> Keith Roberts wrote:
> >>> I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
> >>> module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
> >>> see if temperature changes will afect the test?
> >> I had a system that st
Jake Shipton wrote:
> On 03/11/10 22:03, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>> I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
>>> module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
>>> see if temperature changes will afect the test?
>> I had
On 03/11/10 22:03, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
>> module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
>> see if temperature changes will afect the test?
>
> I had a system that started c
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
> Of Keith Roberts
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:48 PM
> To: centos
> Subject: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
>
> I have run one full test and got no err
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
> module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
> see if temperature changes will afect the test?
I had a system that started crashing randomly. I ran memtest overnight
(abo
On 11/3/2010 4:47 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
> module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
> see if temperature changes will afect the test?
Yes, I've seen a machine where it ran over a weekend before catching an
error (which
It wouldn't harm you to do this?
Jack
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Keith Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:48 PM
To: centos
Subject: [CentOS] Memtest86+ running time
I have run one full test and g
I have run one full test and got no errors on the memory
module. Is it worth keeping it running overnight, just to
see if temperature changes will afect the test?
Regards,
Keith
--
In theory, theory and practice are the same;
in practice they are not.
This email was sent from my laptop with
19 matches
Mail list logo
