William Hooper wrote:
> An this was posted to the CentOS twitter account yesterday 4/7
> (shortly after having to re-issue the x86_64 ISOs):
>
> http://twitter.com/CentOS/status/55950095505567745
>
> "Just want to also point out that CentOS-5.6 is *not* released. And
> packages, ISOS are liable
fred smith wrote:
> Clearly you found my comment to be offensive. It certainly was
> not meant that way. It was simply a friendly warning that depending
> on a pre-announcement set of files may not give you the final product.
Ok, I get the point now. Sorry Fred, my reaction was not appropriate.
Y
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:25:00PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> >> I am grateful for the CentOS Project. I like it's stability and
> >> long-term support.
> > I haven't seen a 5.6 release announcement yet. Have
Les Mikesell wrote on 04/08/2011 05:33 PM:
> Is there some way for yum to know about that?
Only if it errors out on a bad package. There have been (to my
knowledge) two different types of errors. One was a truncated package
on the mirrors that was damaged in transit from the build system. The
On 4/8/2011 4:22 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Olaf Mueller wrote on 04/08/2011 08:35 AM:
> ...
>> The only little problem happens on the upgrade of my server, since my
>> web server doesn't start after reboot. But this was easy to fix since
>> this error was known from the RHEL 5.6 upgrade.
>> https
Olaf Mueller wrote on 04/08/2011 08:35 AM:
...
> The only little problem happens on the upgrade of my server, since my
> web server doesn't start after reboot. But this was easy to fix since
> this error was known from the RHEL 5.6 upgrade.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669963
You
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
>>> I am grateful for the CentOS Project. I like it's stability and
>>> long-term support.
>> I haven't seen a 5.6 release announcement yet. Have I missed it?
On 4/8/2011 3:25 PM, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
>>> I am grateful for the CentOS Project. I like it's stability and
>>> long-term support.
>> I haven't seen a 5.6 release announcement yet. Have I missed it?
> I did not
fred smith wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
>> I am grateful for the CentOS Project. I like it's stability and
>> long-term support.
> I haven't seen a 5.6 release announcement yet. Have I missed it?
I did not use the word announce in my post.
I do not know wh
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:35:30PM +0200, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Hello CentOS developer team,
>
> thank you very much for the release of CentOS 5.6. I have upgraded my
> server, notebook, netbook and workstation from 5.5 to 5.6 and
> everything works really fine so far, CentOS 5.6 seems to be rock
Hello CentOS developer team,
thank you very much for the release of CentOS 5.6. I have upgraded my
server, notebook, netbook and workstation from 5.5 to 5.6 and
everything works really fine so far, CentOS 5.6 seems to be rock solid.
The only little problem happens on the upgrade of my server, sin
11 matches
Mail list logo
