Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6

2008-05-30 Thread Christopher Chan
Exactly!!! What he's complaining about is the lack of lazy-man's GUI tool to configure ip6tables. I may be ethnic Chinese but I grew in Sierra Leone and English is what I use from day to day and I cannot read Chinese characters...or do not recognise enough to claim literacy anyway. Are

Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6

2008-05-30 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Matt Shields wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: The OP is not saying there is no ipv6 netfilter support. He said that there is no ipv6 state netfilter module or something like that. In which case either you d

Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6

2008-05-30 Thread Matt Shields
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: >> The OP is not saying there is no ipv6 netfilter support. He said that >> there is no ipv6 state netfilter module or something like that. > > In which case either you dont know what the OP is talk

Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6

2008-05-30 Thread Les Mikesell
Karanbir Singh wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: The OP is not saying there is no ipv6 netfilter support. He said that there is no ipv6 state netfilter module or something like that. In which case either you dont know what the OP is talking about, or he doesnt know what he asked :D -

Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6

2008-05-30 Thread Karanbir Singh
Christopher Chan wrote: > The OP is not saying there is no ipv6 netfilter support. He said that > there is no ipv6 state netfilter module or something like that. In which case either you dont know what the OP is talking about, or he doesnt know what he asked :D -- [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6

2008-05-29 Thread Christopher Chan
Matt Shields wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall support. Not sure about FC6, but in both CentOS 4 & 5 there is an ip6tables. I haven't used it, but

Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6

2008-05-29 Thread Rob Townley
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Matt Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> > >> We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall > >> support. > >> > >> That requir

Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6

2008-05-29 Thread Matt Shields
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall >> support. >> >> That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or >> some other Linux distro. >>

Re: [CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6

2008-05-29 Thread Christopher Chan
Robert Moskowitz wrote: We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall support. That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or some other Linux distro. None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly FWBuilder can manage

[CentOS] Learning some sad things about the state of IPv6

2008-05-29 Thread Robert Moskowitz
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall support. That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or some other Linux distro. None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly FWBuilder can manage Netfilters for a Linux Ke