Re: [CentOS] Kernel parameters ignored -

2016-02-18 Thread Michael H
On 17/02/16 19:55, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/17/2016 6:39 AM, Michael H wrote: >> Some additional information; >> >> sysctl -a | grep kernel.shm >> kernel.shmall = 8650752 >> kernel.shmmax = 35433480192 >> kernel.shmmni = 4096 >> >> which corresponds to my /etc/sysctl.conf >> kernel.shmmax=354334

Re: [CentOS] Kernel parameters ignored -

2016-02-17 Thread John R Pierce
On 2/17/2016 6:39 AM, Michael H wrote: Some additional information; sysctl -a | grep kernel.shm kernel.shmall = 8650752 kernel.shmmax = 35433480192 kernel.shmmni = 4096 which corresponds to my /etc/sysctl.conf kernel.shmmax=35433480192 kernel.shmall=8650752 but contradicts; ulimit -a [...] sta

Re: [CentOS] Kernel parameters ignored -

2016-02-17 Thread Michael H
On 17/02/16 14:32, Michael H wrote: > Hi, re-posting this with a more appropriate subject for my reply; > >> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, >> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. >> >> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is

[CentOS] Kernel parameters ignored -

2016-02-17 Thread Michael H
Hi, re-posting this with a more appropriate subject for my reply; > The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, > that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. > > Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as > Important .. so you should boot