William L. Maltby wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 15:57 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
Bank 3: f6220002010a at 0
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a brand new server, which has been tested for days with FreeBSD
> in our office, and a few days with Windows on the site of our hardware
> distributor. Now customer wants CentOS, which we installed, but after
> few days we get a kernel
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 15:57 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
> > CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
> > Bank 3: f6220002010a at 32c93500
> > Bank 5: f2
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a brand new server, which has been tested for days with FreeBSD
> in our office, and a few days with Windows on the site of our hardware
> distributor. Now customer wants CentOS, which we installed, but after
> few days we get a kernel
Richard Karhuse wrote:
> Dag's Repo has the new memtest86+ 2.01 RPM. I'd pull it and
> let it run overnight. While memtest86+ is good, I've recently had
> cases where is didn't find (obvious) memory errors.
My favorite test is cerberus(ctcs). Quite a few OEMs out there
use it to burn in their s
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> CentOS release 5 (Final)
> Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 on an i686
>
> ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
> CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
> Bank 3: f6220002010a at 32c93500
> Ban
On 6/20/08, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Easiest is to buy from a vendor that can test on your OS of choice,
> there are lots of vendors out there that can do it.
>
> Two such companies I have bought from that do this include
> http://www.siliconmechanics.com/ (HQ in Seattle, WA area)
> http:
Michael wrote:
> But I don't want to get into the situation above, where I purchase NEW
> hardware, and CentOS doesn't like it, and furthermore the resolution is
> elusive.
>
> What is the best HW environment for CentOS?
> Brand, MFG, chipset rev, and so on
Easiest is to buy from a vendor tha
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CentOS release 5 (Final)
Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 on an i686
ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
Bank 3: f6220002010a at 32c93500
B
On 6/20/08, Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CentOS release 5 (Final)
> Kernel 2.6.18-53.1.21.el5 on an i686
>
> ws174 login: CPU 1: Machine Check Exception: 0005
> CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: 0004
> Bank 3: f6220002010a at 32c93500
> Bank 5: f2
2008/6/20 Alwin Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
>
> Is there someone on this mailing list who could/want help me figure out
> this issue? We do not know where to look to solve this.
>
If your installation is standard CentOS with no thirdparty software, and
configurations, I would first run the
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 14:40 +0200, Alwin Roosen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Is there someone on this mailing list who could/want help me figure out
> this issue? We do not know where to look to solve this.
...
> I would be very surprised if this is hardware related.
A google on
"Machine Check Exception
Hi,
Is there someone on this mailing list who could/want help me figure out
this issue? We do not know where to look to solve this.
--- Description ---
This is a brand new server, which has been tested for days with FreeBSD
in our office, and a few days with Windows on the site of our hardware
13 matches
Mail list logo
