Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On 7/5/07, Mark Hull-Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 20:04 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> > When you got this warning:
>> >
>> > > WARNING: "autofs_kill_sb" [fs/autofs/autofs.ko] undefined!
>> >
>> > did you copy the config file from the SOURCES director
On 7/5/07, Mark Hull-Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 20:04 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> When you got this warning:
>
> > WARNING: "autofs_kill_sb" [fs/autofs/autofs.ko] undefined!
>
> did you copy the config file from the SOURCES directory? And did you
> run "make oldconfi
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 20:04 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> When you got this warning:
>
> > WARNING: "autofs_kill_sb" [fs/autofs/autofs.ko] undefined!
>
> did you copy the config file from the SOURCES directory? And did you
> run "make oldconfig" after copying but before "make menuconfig"? If
> thi
On 7/3/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/3/07, Mark Hull-Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, interesting - where did you get this source (I want it!). I
> pulled down mine from
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.0/updates/SRPMS/ yesterday - it is
> dated 15-Jun-2007 23:32, w
On 7/3/07, Mark Hull-Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, interesting - where did you get this source (I want it!). I
pulled down mine from
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.0/updates/SRPMS/ yesterday - it is
dated 15-Jun-2007 23:32, which is 15 days older than your config
files. Mine (whic
On 7/3/07, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't intend to dispute either, but what I see is defferent from
yours. My source's BUILD directory contains these .config files:
61487 Jun 30 12:09 kernel-2.6.18-x86_64.config
61520 Jun 30 12:09 kernel-2.6.18-x86_64-debug.config
60896 Jun
On 7/3/07, Mark Hull-Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 17:33 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> You must have changed something other than the NTFS option. autofs is
> supposedly OFF by default. Instead, autofs4 is used in the CentOS
> kernel.
>
Not to dispute you, but actually
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 17:33 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> You must have changed something other than the NTFS option. autofs is
> supposedly OFF by default. Instead, autofs4 is used in the CentOS
> kernel.
>
Not to dispute you, but actually they are all configured as modules
("m") in all three of
On 7/2/07, Mark Hull-Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What does this mean:
WARNING: "autofs_kill_sb" [fs/autofs/autofs.ko] undefined!
WARNING:
/var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.nx-root/lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.nx/kernel/fs/autofs/autofs.ko
needs unknown symbol autofs_kill_sb
It causes
What does this mean:
WARNING: "autofs_kill_sb" [fs/autofs/autofs.ko] undefined!
WARNING:
/var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.nx-root/lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.6.el5.nx/kernel/fs/autofs/autofs.ko
needs unknown symbol autofs_kill_sb
It causes a similar warning when I install the kernel. The only chang
10 matches
Mail list logo