Dougal Ballantyne wrote:
> James,
>
> Thank you. This is very helpful. It does seem like a very strange
> change in behavior between CentOS/RHEL4,5 & 6.
>
> I am rebuilding a kernel with only i_blksize restored for NFS. Don't
> like having to change the kernel but might be needed to keep
> consis
James,
Thank you. This is very helpful. It does seem like a very strange
change in behavior between CentOS/RHEL4,5 & 6.
I am rebuilding a kernel with only i_blksize restored for NFS. Don't
like having to change the kernel but might be needed to keep
consistency accross releases.
-Dougal
On Mon,
Dougal Ballantyne wrote:
>
> I have recently upgraded several servers from CentOS4 to CentOS5 and I am
> noticing a strange change to the stat() call. I have written a very
> small program to test and show the behavior. I am calling stat()
> against a file which is exported from my NAS and mounted
Hi David,
I am using NFSv3. Sorry, should have said that!
-Dougal
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:06 PM, David Sommerseth
wrote:
> On 10/12/10 18:23, Dougal Ballantyne wrote:
>> Dear CentOS,
>>
>> I have recently upgraded several servers from CentOS4 to CentOS5 and I am
>> noticing a strange change t
On 10/12/10 18:23, Dougal Ballantyne wrote:
> Dear CentOS,
>
> I have recently upgraded several servers from CentOS4 to CentOS5 and I am
> noticing a strange change to the stat() call. I have written a very
> small program to test and show the behavior. I am calling stat()
> against a file which is
Dear CentOS,
I have recently upgraded several servers from CentOS4 to CentOS5 and I am
noticing a strange change to the stat() call. I have written a very
small program to test and show the behavior. I am calling stat()
against a file which is exported from my NAS and mounted with 32k
read/write s
6 matches
Mail list logo
