yonatan pingle wrote:
> It would be much better controlling this values from your /etc/fstab file,
> so in case of any future references to fsck on boot, you will know
> what's configured by file.
> man fstab , and read about the sixth field.
I would disagree with that as there's a difference in
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Mark wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Mark
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Is it safe to run tune2fs -c -1 -i 0 /dev/sda2 on
> mounted file system
>
> It is safer than cross-posting to multiple OS discussion lists
> On Jul 6, 2011 10:32 PM, &
It is safer than cross-posting to multiple OS discussion lists
On Jul 6, 2011 10:32 PM, "Sherin George" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it safe to run tune2fs -c -1 -i 0 /dev/sda2 on mounted file system
>
> Basically, this is a command to disable fsck based on reboot count &
> last fsck time.
>
> --
> Reg
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is it safe to run tune2fs -c -1 -i 0 /dev/sda2 on mounted file system
>>
>> Basically, this is a command to disable fsck based on reboot count &
>> last fsck time.
>
> The RHEL/CentOS installed does exactly this, -c 0 -i 0, so yes
> Hi,
>
> Is it safe to run tune2fs -c -1 -i 0 /dev/sda2 on mounted file system
>
> Basically, this is a command to disable fsck based on reboot count &
> last fsck time.
The RHEL/CentOS installed does exactly this, -c 0 -i 0, so yes it's
considered safe.
Simon
_
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 06:32, Sherin George wrote:
> Is it safe to run tune2fs -c -1 -i 0 /dev/sda2 on mounted file system
Yes.
--
Kind Regards,
Christopher J. Buckley
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
Hi,
Is it safe to run tune2fs -c -1 -i 0 /dev/sda2 on mounted file system
Basically, this is a command to disable fsck based on reboot count &
last fsck time.
--
Regards,
Sherin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
7 matches
Mail list logo
