Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread David Klann
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:47:08 -0600 Ned Slider wrote: > Welcome :-) > Thanks! > > > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Network/SecuringSSH Good guide -- thanks for pointing it out. I also like the idea of implementing denyhosts that Steve Huff pointed out. I use that on a public (virtual) server I

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread Ned Slider
David Klann wrote: > New to the list, so please forgive unintentional netiquette > transgressions... > Welcome :-) > > Discounting DoS or DDoS attacks, my solution to nefarious SSH attempts > is threefold: 1) run sshd on a port other than 22 (I know, obscurity > is not security...), 2) disabl

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread Steve Huff
On Jan 12, 2009, at 3:24 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: It is evident that this attacker had more than one netblock available. It is conceivable that, instead of serially attacking us, they could just have easily attempted multiple simultaneous connections from all of their available IP address

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread David Klann
New to the list, so please forgive unintentional netiquette transgressions... On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:24:54 -0600 "James B. Byrne" wrote: > Thanks for the help. I completely missed that error. > > > > throttle threshold of 15 seconds. I am still concerned about any > brute force attempt to dis

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread James B. Byrne
Thanks for the help. I completely missed that error. This guy is persistent. After I cut off 220.232.152.137 we had intrusion attempts from 216.107.171.10. After I cut off that one then we had attempts from 69.80.235.135. Since blocking that network we have had no more attempts recorded. When

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread nate
James B. Byrne wrote: > Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (2 references) > num target prot opt source destination > 1DROP all -- 202.14.0.0/24anywhere > 2DROP all -- 220.232.0.0/24 anywhere > Jan 12 13:36:02 inet01 sshd[16056]: Received disconnect

Re: [CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Mon, January 12, 2009 1:37 pm, James B. Byrne wrote: > I have these rules in effect: > 1DROP all -- 202.14.0.0/24anywhere > 2DROP all -- 220.232.0.0/24 anywhere > > Note particularly line 2. > > Now, notwithstanding the above, I see this in my /var/log/sec

[CentOS] Intrusion Attempt Prevension - iptables problems

2009-01-12 Thread James B. Byrne
I have these rules in effect: ]# iptables --list --line-numbers Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) num target prot opt source destination 1RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) num target prot opt source destin