On 5/26/2011 11:50 AM Steven Crothers spake the following:
>
>> more beneficial in the long run for the project. However, they are
>> currently worried about people "stealing" their work and starting
>> their own rebuilds of RHEL, which if that was going to happen it
>> would have already. The SL
On May 26, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Steven Crothers wrote:
>>> opens community development. Having one developer doing all the
>>> packaging (Johnny) is a waste of resources and intelligence. A
>>> simple
>>
>> oh no! please don't anybody re
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Steven Crothers wrote:
>> opens community development. Having one developer doing all the
>> packaging (Johnny) is a waste of resources and intelligence. A simple
>
> oh no! please don't anybody reply, despite gross inaccuracies such as
> that quoted above, and turn
Steven Crothers wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:06 PM, wrote:
>> Me thinks its awesome for the updates, you have no idea how many times
>> I've had to defend Centos on other lists.
>>
>> Kooks saying the project is dead, Dags departure from the dev list is
>> the end, blah blah blah. Just she
Steven Crothers wrote:
> opens community development. Having one developer doing all the
> packaging (Johnny) is a waste of resources and intelligence. A simple
oh no! please don't anybody reply, despite gross inaccuracies such as
that quoted above, and turn this into another 100-post flamewar...
on 5/26/2011 11:50 AM Steven Crothers spake the following:
> Fedora and Debian in my opinion are both superior to the way CentOS
> opens community development. Having one developer doing all the
> packaging (Johnny) is a waste of resources and intelligence. A simple
> repository where we can all
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:06 PM, wrote:
> Me thinks its awesome for the updates, you have no idea how many times
> I've had to defend Centos on other lists.
>
> Kooks saying the project is dead, Dags departure from the dev list is
> the end, blah blah blah. Just shear nonsense.
Please don't rea
On May 26, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Steven Crothers wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Drew wrote:
>> I don't believe you can. My understanding is that CentOS' QA builds
>> are internal to the team and those aren't released to the general
>> public.
>>
>> The only reason we know about them is be
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Drew wrote:
> I don't believe you can. My understanding is that CentOS' QA builds
> are internal to the team and those aren't released to the general
> public.
>
> The only reason we know about them is because of changes made by TPTB
> to improve transparency & ope
> Where can I get these ISO's I have a couple of Dell R710's with Broadcom
> 10Gb nic's, a R610 and and a ESX4.1 environment that I can QA on.
I don't believe you can. My understanding is that CentOS' QA builds
are internal to the team and those aren't released to the general
public.
The only rea
On 25 May 2011 01:03, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> In case you didn't see it, the initial CentOS 6 trees have been
> released to QA:
>
> http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/node/81
>
>
Where can I get these ISO's I have a couple of Dell R710's with Broadcom
10Gb nic's, a R610 and and a ESX4.1 environment tha
On Tue, May 24, 2011 11:33, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> In case you didn't see it, the initial CentOS 6 trees have been
> released to QA:
>
>http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/node/81
>
Now, perhaps, some civility will return to the list. I recall this
from my previous life:
Dost think in a moment of
In case you didn't see it, the initial CentOS 6 trees have been
released to QA:
http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/node/81
--
Paul Heinlein <> heinl...@madboa.com <> http://www.madboa.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/
13 matches
Mail list logo
