Christian Wahlgren wrote:
> But when I looked in the Release Notes for CentOS-5.3, it doesn't mention
> "yum update glibc" at all, so maybe that upstream bug has been solved
> for CentOS-5.3?
Ummm. It does. In the "Known Issues" section.
Ralph
pgpSP072szgj9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
d2009/4/1 Ralph Angenendt :
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> The caution about first updating glibc (?) is important. I recall from
>> the update to 5.2, there is a difference, between "yum upgrade" and
>> "yum update".
>
> No, there is not. Except if you fiddled with the configuration and
> turned *off*
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Christian Wahlgren
>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:37 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
>
>2009/4/1 Sorin Sr
2009/4/1 Sorin Srbu :
> I've now updated a machine with CentOS v5.3 x86_64. On this first test, the
> glibc didn't update at all and threw up an dependency error. Running yum
> update; no yum clean all run first, upgraded everything with no errors. Go
> figure.
I had the same problem with dependen
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Mike A. Harris
>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:31 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
>
>I did the update by
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> "Yum upgrade" or "yum update"? What's the take on that one here on the list?
Oh God, Not Again!
upgrade and update do exactly the same, except if *YOU* yourself turned
off "obsoletes=1" in /etc/yum.conf. There is *NO* difference.
Ralph
pgpVyeA6g4iwZ.pgp
Description: PGP sig
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The caution about first updating glibc (?) is important. I recall from
> the update to 5.2, there is a difference, between "yum upgrade" and
> "yum update".
No, there is not. Except if you fiddled with the configuration and
turned *off* obsoletes in /etc/yum.conf.
> I belie
Michael A. Peters wrote:
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>>> Of Gilbert Sebenste
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:44 PM
>>> To: CentOS mailing lis
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Michael A. Peters
>Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 8:57 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
>
>Sorin Srbu w
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>> Of Gilbert Sebenste
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:44 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO im
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Gilbert Sebenste
>Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:44 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] I see 5.3 ISO images on the mirrors
>
>On Tue, 31 Mar 2
On Mar 31, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>>> You don't need to change anything. 'yum update' will update things,
>>> within a given major release (eg 4.x or 5.x). It will happen
>>> automagically. Going from 4.x to 5.x requires using the
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Lanny Marcus wrote:
You don't need to change anything. 'yum update' will update things,
within a given major release (eg 4.x or 5.x). It will happen
automagically. Going from 4.x to 5.x requires using the installer (eg
the ISOs and a reboot with the installer CD/DVD). I d
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:44:00 -0500 (CDT) CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
>> > On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>> > So, is it live yet? :-)
>> Almost. Another several more hours before they all
On 31-Mar-09, at 12:15 PM, dnk wrote:
On 31-Mar-09, at 11:46 AM, RobertH wrote:
For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
# yum update glibc
# yum update
You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
d
if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that
someone
already has b
On 31-Mar-09, at 11:46 AM, RobertH wrote:
>
>>
>> For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
>>
>> # yum update glibc
>> # yum update
>>
>> You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
>>
>>
>> d
>
> if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that
> someone
> already has booked?
>
>
RobertH wrote:
>> For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
>>
>> # yum update glibc
>> # yum update
>>
>> You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
>
> if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that someone
> already has booked?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=5.3+%22yum+update+glibc+%22+s
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 18:41:48 Florin Andrei wrote:
> On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>
> So, is it live yet? :-)
Well It's live on my local mirror. I've just done a yum update on a test
server and everything seems OK. So it looks like the wait was worth it.
Good job to all those CentO
>
> For 5.x to 5.3, you must:
>
> # yum update glibc
> # yum update
>
> You need to update glibc first (upstream bug I believe).
>
>
> d
if this is so, is there a link to this on upstream website that someone
already has booked?
please share
- rh
At Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:44:00 -0500 (CDT) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
> > On one mirror that I tried, at least.
> >
> > So, is it live yet? :-)
>
> Almost. Another several more hours before they all sync, and then we're
> good to go.
>
> BTW, ho
on 3-31-2009 10:41 AM Florin Andrei spake the following:
> On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>
> So, is it live yet? :-)
>
The announcement will tell you if it is live. Prior updates seem to have been
done like this;
Packages and ISO's are synced to mirrors. Maybe packages first, then ISO's.
thus Gilbert Sebenste spake:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>> On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>>
>> So, is it live yet? :-)
Yap. I'm seeding ISO images for four hours already.
My machine at home (this one) is 5.3 already (clean install from DVD):
[t...@dragon ~]$ uname -a
On 31-Mar-09, at 10:44 AM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>> On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>>
>> So, is it live yet? :-)
>
> Almost. Another several more hours before they all sync, and then
> we're
> good to go.
>
> BTW, how does this work? If I w
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On one mirror that I tried, at least.
>
> So, is it live yet? :-)
Almost. Another several more hours before they all sync, and then we're
good to go.
BTW, how does this work? If I want to go from 5.2 to 5.3, can I just
type "yum upgrade"? If so, what
On one mirror that I tried, at least.
So, is it live yet? :-)
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
25 matches
Mail list logo
