Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-09 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 8/1/2014 8:28 μμ, Les Mikesell wrote: > The concept doesn't even make sense for TCP connections where the > stack requires acks and sequencing. Are you trying to bridge to a > capture device or something? Thank you all for your enlightening feedback, which helped me better understand my situ

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Brian Miller wrote: > >> that doesn't make any sense. >> >> a SYN packet comes in, is forwarded to serverA and serverB >> >> both servers reply with an 'ack' man, is the client tcp stack going >> to be confused! > > > He didn't say anything about both servers r

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread Brian Miller
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 11:23 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > that doesn't make any sense. > > a SYN packet comes in, is forwarded to serverA and serverB > > both servers reply with an 'ack' man, is the client tcp stack going > to be confused! He didn't say anything about both servers replyi

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread John R Pierce
On 1/8/2014 5:02 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > Actually, I don't want load balancing; I want incoming http traffic (to > port 8080) to be forwarded to*ALL* defined target IP addresses. that doesn't make any sense. a SYN packet comes in, is forwarded to serverA and serverB both servers reply with

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread Steve Clark
On 01/08/2014 11:32 AM, Darr247 wrote: > On 2014-01-08 8:02 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: >> Actually, I don't want load balancing; I want incoming http traffic >> (to port 8080) to be forwarded to *ALL* defined target IP addresses. > Sometimes the correct answer is, "you can't do that." :) > > You ca

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Joseph Spenner wrote: > >> Actually, I don't want load balancing; I want incoming http traffic >> (to port 8080) to be forwarded to *ALL* defined target IP addresses. >> > > What is the goal (other than forward 1 request to 2 servers)? > It would kinda be a mess, s

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread Joseph Spenner
- "Nikolaos Milas" escreveu: > De: "Nikolaos Milas" > Para: "CentOS mailing list" > Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 2014 11:02:48 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected > Assunto: Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic > > On 8/1/2014 11:54 πμ, Anton

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread Darr247
On 2014-01-08 8:02 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > Actually, I don't want load balancing; I want incoming http traffic > (to port 8080) to be forwarded to *ALL* defined target IP addresses. Sometimes the correct answer is, "you can't do that." :) You can talk TO port 80 on all the defined target IP

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread John Doe
From: Nikolaos Milas > Actually, I don't want load balancing; I want incoming http traffic (to > port 8080) to be forwarded to *ALL* defined target IP addresses. Could you describe the traffic exchange you expect...? 1. http request to 8080. 2. request is forwarded to n servers on 80. 3. n serv

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread Antonio da Silva Martins Junior
- "Nikolaos Milas" escreveu: > De: "Nikolaos Milas" > Para: "CentOS mailing list" > Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 2014 11:02:48 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected > Assunto: Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic > > On 8/1/2014 11:54 πμ, Anton

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 8/1/2014 11:54 πμ, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: > Well, I had only used with a "range". Maybe you can take a look on a > software load-balancer, like haproxy, or use something like nginx. Then > forward to the load-balancer instead to the servers. Thanks, Actually, I don't want load

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread Antonio da Silva Martins Junior
- "Nikolaos Milas" escreveu: > De: "Nikolaos Milas" > Para: "CentOS mailing list" > Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 8 de Janeiro de 2014 6:43:16 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected > Assunto: Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic > > On 7/1/2014 6:19 μμ, Antonio

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-08 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 7/1/2014 6:19 μμ, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote: > If you put it that way only xxx will receive packets, to balance betwin > both of them > you will need this: > > -A PREROUTING -s 10.250.250.0/24 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT > --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx-yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-07 Thread Antonio da Silva Martins Junior
- "Nikolaos Milas" escreveu: > De: "Nikolaos Milas" > Para: centos@centos.org > Enviadas: Terça-feira, 7 de Janeiro de 2014 10:28:33 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected > Assunto: [CentOS] Forward http traffic > > Hello, > > On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-07 Thread Leon Fauster
Am 07.01.2014 um 15:01 schrieb Vipul Agarwal : > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables): >> >> *filter >> :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] >> :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] >> :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] >> :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]

Re: [CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-07 Thread Vipul Agarwal
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > Hello, > > On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables): > > *filter > :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] > :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] > :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] > :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] > -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT > -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-

[CentOS] Forward http traffic

2014-01-07 Thread Nikolaos Milas
Hello, On CentOS 6.5 x86_64 I have (/etc/sysconfig/iptables): *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp