>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Michael A. Peters
>Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 8:56 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
>
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
>> Of John R Pierce
>> Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 6:38 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don'
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Robert Spangler
>Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:42 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
&g
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of John R Pierce
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 6:38 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
>&g
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 18:41 -0400, Robert Spangler wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 April 2009 21:26, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> > If your torrent has distributed hash table capability, I suggest that
> > you also use that feature.
> >
> > Happy sharing!
>
> So what is everyone using for their torr
Robert Spangler wrote:
> So what is everyone using for their torrent?
> What is the best?
(rtorrent) ftw!
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 21:26, William L. Maltby wrote:
> If your torrent has distributed hash table capability, I suggest that
> you also use that feature.
>
> Happy sharing!
So what is everyone using for their torrent?
What is the best?
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
http://cou
on 4-2-2009 1:36 PM Marko Vojinovic spake the following:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 22:19 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a
> > peer?
>
> yes, which is why I said all these machines were locaed inside hosting
> DC's - which normally have good connectivity. O
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Aren't these speeds a relative notion, ie. dependent on where you are as a
> peer?
yes, which is why I said all these machines were locaed inside hosting
DC's - which normally have good connectivity. One on the East coast US,
one on the West Coast, one in Germany, one i
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> John R Pierce wrote:
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
in the early stages was running at 2
On Thursday 02 April 2009 18:53, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
> >> here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
> >> came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
> >> in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps.
> >
> > geez,
John R Pierce wrote:
>> here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
>> came up were each running with 100mbps open uplinks. Atleast one person
>> in the early stages was running at 200 odd mbps.
>>
> geez, makes me wonder if I should even bother to leave mine runnin
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>> According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway,
>> that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts
>> everyday, at least I don't.
>>
>
> here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Karanbir Singh
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:34 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
&g
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> That's dedication... I decap my bt-client after work hours (from 1700hrs to
> 0700 weekdays, and full speed continuesly over the weekends). I wonder if
> the ridiculously high 40k-share ratio Azureus reports here has something to
> do with this. Hmm...
the machines seeding at t
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Karanbir Singh
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:07 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
>Sori
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> According to wifey, I'm one of those insatiably curious ones. ;-) Anyway,
> that's a lot of data being shuffled! You don't see that kind of TB-amounts
> everyday, at least I don't.
here is a bit more trivia for those interested: the 4 main 'seeds' that
came up were each runnin
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of William L. Maltby
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 1:47 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
>
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 09:14 +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> there's really some traffic going on torrent-wise:
>
> [View: main]
> CentOS-5.3-i386-bin-DVD
> done 3787,1 MB Rate: 928,2 / 0,0 KB Uploaded: 142450,0 MB
>
> [View: main]
> CentOS-5.3-x86_64-bin-DVD
> done 434
>> For those who may forget, usin torrents to download and share the new
>> images will get you faster downloads (if enough folks participate) if
>> you have a "fat" pipe and alleviate the load on the CentOS servers.
>>
>> I have a "chubby" pipe (~ 1.2MB/sec) and got the stuff really quickly
>> ear
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of William L. Maltby
>Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:26 AM
>To: CentOS General List
>Subject: [CentOS] Don't forget to use torrents for your downloads!
>
>F
William L. Maltby wrote:
> For those who may forget, usin torrents to download and share the new
> images will get you faster downloads (if enough folks participate) if
> you have a "fat" pipe and alleviate the load on the CentOS servers.
>
> I have a "chubby" pipe (~ 1.2MB/sec) and got the stuff r
For those who may forget, usin torrents to download and share the new
images will get you faster downloads (if enough folks participate) if
you have a "fat" pipe and alleviate the load on the CentOS servers.
I have a "chubby" pipe (~ 1.2MB/sec) and got the stuff really quickly
earlier today.
If y
24 matches
Mail list logo
