On 01/18/2015 09:55 PM, Peter wrote:
> On 01/19/2015 10:51 AM, Tim wrote:
>> Just my two cents: Anyone thought of asking Red Hat to use
>> documentation? I think they are getting much from the community so
>> to copy public accessible documentation when permitted by RH could be
>> an easy way.
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2015 12:29 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 18/01/15 03:45 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> On 01/18/2015 02:14 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>> On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote:
On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote:
> So either the link sho
On 1/18/2015 9:37 PM, Peter wrote:
I don't see why we couldn't, or shouldn't modify it, though, so logn as
we first make sure to comply with the rest of the license provisions, ie
remove RedHat trademarks, give appropriate attribution and link to the
original docs, then we can go ahead and modify
On 19/01/15 12:37 AM, Peter wrote:
On 01/19/2015 05:18 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Well then there appears to be no reason to not go with a version of my
initial suggestion.
State what CentOS is and what it's sources are. State that there may be
some minor divergence between the behavior of CantO
On 01/19/2015 05:18 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Well then there appears to be no reason to not go with a version of my
> initial suggestion.
>
> State what CentOS is and what it's sources are. State that there may be
> some minor divergence between the behavior of CantOS and the Red Hat
> document
On 01/18/15 22:55, Peter wrote:
> On 01/19/2015 10:51 AM, Tim wrote:
>> Just my two cents: Anyone thought of asking Red Hat to use
>> documentation? I think they are getting much from the community so
>> to copy public accessible documentation when permitted by RH could be
>> an easy way.
>>
>> Wh
On 01/19/2015 10:51 AM, Tim wrote:
> Just my two cents: Anyone thought of asking Red Hat to use
> documentation? I think they are getting much from the community so
> to copy public accessible documentation when permitted by RH could be
> an easy way.
>
> Why not giving that a try?
There's no ne
Just my two cents: Anyone thought of asking Red Hat to use documentation? I
think they are getting much from the community so to copy public accessible
documentation when permitted by RH could be an easy way.
Why not giving that a try?
Am 18. Januar 2015 20:56:59 MEZ, schrieb Darr247 :
>On 18 J
On 18 January 2015 @19:07 zulu, Mark LaPierre wrote:
good at C or C++ but I can write documentation. Especially if it's
already pretty much written and all I have to do is copy and paste.
Unless you get RH's permission in writing to do so, in advance, I'm
pretty-sure copy and paste does not
On 18/01/15 03:45 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/18/2015 02:14 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote:
On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote:
So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be
updated.
Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs s
On 01/18/15 03:45, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 01/18/2015 02:14 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote:
>>> On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote:
So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be
updated.
>>>
>>> Well, until someone rewri
On 01/18/2015 02:14 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote:
>> On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote:
>>> So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be
>>> updated.
>>>
>>
>> Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they don't violate
>> copyr
On 17/01/15 09:14 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote:
On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote:
So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be
updated.
Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they don't violate
copyright laws, and links
On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote:
> On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote:
>> So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be
>> updated.
>>
>
> Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they don't violate
> copyright laws, and links to them on that centos.org/docs
On 15/01/15 10:55 PM, Darr247 wrote:
On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote:
So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be
updated.
Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they don't violate
copyright laws, and links to them on that centos.org/docs page, I'l
On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote:
So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be
updated.
Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they don't violate
copyright laws, and links to them on that centos.org/docs page, I'll
continue perusing and referring t
On Thu, January 15, 2015 6:50 pm, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 19:05 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> Hey All,
>>
>> I just installed the newest version of Firefox that was pushed to
>> production today. When I started Firefox the CentOS 7 Is Here splash
>> screen was displayed.
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 19:05 -0500, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I just installed the newest version of Firefox that was pushed to
> production today. When I started Firefox the CentOS 7 Is Here splash
> screen was displayed. Out of curiosity I clicked on the [Documentation]
> tab at the
On 15/01/15 07:27 PM, Darr247 wrote:
On 16 January 2015 @00:05 zulu, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Does anyone else see a problem here?
Try
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/
then choose the version on the left.
While useful, I don't imagine that was Mark's point
On 16 January 2015 @00:05 zulu, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Does anyone else see a problem here?
Try
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/
then choose the version on the left.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ht
On 15/01/15 07:05 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Hey All,
I just installed the newest version of Firefox that was pushed to
production today. When I started Firefox the CentOS 7 Is Here splash
screen was displayed. Out of curiosity I clicked on the [Documentation]
tab at the top of the screen and go
Hey All,
I just installed the newest version of Firefox that was pushed to
production today. When I started Firefox the CentOS 7 Is Here splash
screen was displayed. Out of curiosity I clicked on the [Documentation]
tab at the top of the screen and got this:
http://www.centos.org/docs/
Does an
22 matches
Mail list logo
