Re: [CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

2010-07-30 Thread Les Mikesell
On 7/29/2010 3:36 PM, Lars Hecking wrote: > >> Do you know if you have to do anything special in the case where the >> primary server has been down for a while and is then brought back up? >> That is, does the backup automatically re-sync the database with the new >> leases that have been given out

Re: [CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

2010-07-29 Thread Lars Hecking
> Do you know if you have to do anything special in the case where the > primary server has been down for a while and is then brought back up? > That is, does the backup automatically re-sync the database with the new > leases that have been given out, or does it not have to? Nope, it's all

Re: [CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

2010-07-29 Thread Les Mikesell
On 7/29/2010 8:03 AM, Lars Hecking wrote: >> >>> The servers will balance the pool(s) between them. It's actually fun (for >>> personal preference values of "fun") to tail the logs on both servers >>> after starting the slave and watch dhcpd communicate. >> >> >> So they "only" balance the po

Re: [CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

2010-07-29 Thread Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator
Am 29.07.10 15:03, schrieb Lars Hecking: >> >>> The servers will balance the pool(s) between them. It's actually fun (for >>> personal preference values of "fun") to tail the logs on both servers >>> after starting the slave and watch dhcpd communicate. >> >> >> So they "only" balance the pool

Re: [CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

2010-07-29 Thread Lars Hecking
> > > The servers will balance the pool(s) between them. It's actually fun (for > > personal preference values of "fun") to tail the logs on both servers > > after starting the slave and watch dhcpd communicate. > > > So they "only" balance the pool and no 1:1 assignment from > IP:Host-MAC-a

Re: [CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

2010-07-29 Thread Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator
Am 29.07.10 14:29, schrieb Phil Manuel: > On 29/07/10 9:55 PM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I plan to reorganise our IP management and I'd like to implement a slave >> DHCP server. Right now we assign IP addresses based on the >> ethernetadress of a client 1:1. >> >> The tutor

Re: [CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

2010-07-29 Thread Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator
Am 29.07.10 14:31, schrieb Lars Hecking: > G?tz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator writes: >> Hi, >> >> I plan to reorganise our IP management and I'd like to implement a slave >> DHCP server. Right now we assign IP addresses based on the >> ethernetadress of a client 1:1. >> >> The tutorial here [1] is sim

Re: [CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

2010-07-29 Thread Lars Hecking
G?tz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator writes: > Hi, > > I plan to reorganise our IP management and I'd like to implement a slave > DHCP server. Right now we assign IP addresses based on the > ethernetadress of a client 1:1. > > The tutorial here [1] is simple and looks like the thing I need. > > I do h

Re: [CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

2010-07-29 Thread Phil Manuel
On 29/07/10 9:55 PM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to reorganise our IP management and I'd like to implement a slave > DHCP server. Right now we assign IP addresses based on the > ethernetadress of a client 1:1. > > The tutorial here [1] is simple and looks like the thing I

[CentOS] DHCP failover ... Some questions.

2010-07-29 Thread Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator
Hi, I plan to reorganise our IP management and I'd like to implement a slave DHCP server. Right now we assign IP addresses based on the ethernetadress of a client 1:1. The tutorial here [1] is simple and looks like the thing I need. I do have a lot of subnetworks and my cisco router has an DHCP