Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Chris Boyd
On Jul 2, 2009, at 2:48 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > The subject says it all. On my "server" machine in the local LAN > (192.168.1.252 in a 192.168.1.0/24 network), I setup Bind. I installed > the 'caching-nameserver' package, which provides a set of > configuration > files for Bind so it can be us

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Tom Brown
> I just got it to work. In fact, I deleted the stock caching-nameserver > package and followed this excellent tutorial: > > http://www.madboa.com/geek/soho-bind/ > > i dont see what was wrong with the stock one - seems you did not fully configure it _

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread luc...@lastdot.org
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: > Tom Brown a écrit : > >> what does you named.conf look like? i am guessing you have it set to >> only listen on localhost >> >> make sure you have a line similar to >> >> listen-on port 53 { 192.168.10.1; }; >> >> and bounce named > > I just got

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Niki Kovacs
Tom Brown a écrit : > what does you named.conf look like? i am guessing you have it set to > only listen on localhost > > make sure you have a line similar to > > listen-on port 53 { 192.168.10.1; }; > > and bounce named I just got it to work. In fact, I deleted the stock caching-nameserver

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Tom Brown
> > No, that's not it. I disabled the (internal) firewall just for testing's > sake, and still nothing. I can only use Bind on localhost (e. g. on the > machine where I installed it), but not from any other machine on the > network. > what does you named.conf look like? i am guessing you ha

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread John Doe
From: Niki Kovacs > No, that's not it. I disabled the (internal) firewall just for testing's > sake, and still nothing. I can only use Bind on localhost (e. g. on the > machine where I installed it), but not from any other machine on the > network. what does the following command output on th

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Niki Kovacs
Tom Brown a écrit : > > 53 udp and tcp ? No, that's not it. I disabled the (internal) firewall just for testing's sake, and still nothing. I can only use Bind on localhost (e. g. on the machine where I installed it), but not from any other machine on the network. _

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Tom Brown
> > Now I'd like all the other machines on the network to use this local DNS > server instead of my ISP's DNS. First thing, I know Bind uses port 53, > so I take care to open that port on the server as well as on the other > machines in the network. Then, I try to use my local DNS server manual

Re: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Per Qvindesland
Hi Do you really need to use bind perhaps dnsmasq  would be a better option for you. Per E-mail: p...@norhex.com [1] http://www.linkedin.com/in/perqvindesland [2] --- Original message follows --- SUBJECT: [CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success FROM:  Niki Kovacs TO

[CentOS] Configure a local DNS caching nameserver: partial success

2009-07-02 Thread Niki Kovacs
Hi, The subject says it all. On my "server" machine in the local LAN (192.168.1.252 in a 192.168.1.0/24 network), I setup Bind. I installed the 'caching-nameserver' package, which provides a set of configuration files for Bind so it can be used as a caching nameserver out of the box. On the se