On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Steven Vishoot wrote:
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
something really screwy around here!
Steven
What do others have to say? Now that I think of it, I also had the same
situation occur on a 32-bit install on a laptop from CDs. Again, my
preferred
--- Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> > Before we take this any further ... was the key
> you imported to a
> > repository other than an official CentOS one. (for
> example, RPMForge,
> > ATRPMS, etc.).
>
> The install was from DVD, default
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Before we take this any further ... was the key you imported to a
repository other than an official CentOS one. (for example, RPMForge,
ATRPMS, etc.).
The install was from DVD, default packages (I planned to use yum for
updates, etc). No other repos
Scott R Ehrlich wrote:
> Quoting Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Scott Ehrlich wrote:
>>> Media checked fine with both md5sum and sha1sum. I believe I obtained
>>> my DVD version from kernel.org, and were obtained within the last couple
>>> of months.
>>
>> what does this say : 'rpm -qf
Quoting Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
Media checked fine with both md5sum and sha1sum. I believe I obtained
my DVD version from kernel.org, and were obtained within the last couple
of months.
what does this say : 'rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo'
sudo
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
Media checked fine with both md5sum and sha1sum. I believe I obtained
my DVD version from kernel.org, and were obtained within the last couple
of months.
what does this say : 'rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo'
and what
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> Media checked fine with both md5sum and sha1sum. I believe I obtained
> my DVD version from kernel.org, and were obtained within the last couple
> of months.
what does this say : 'rpm -qf /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo'
and what does this say : 'rpm -V centos-release'
Media checked fine with both md5sum and sha1sum. I believe I obtained my
DVD version from kernel.org, and were obtained within the last couple of
months.
Other insights and ideas welcome.
Thanks.
Scott
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi Scott,
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I just perf
hi Scott,
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I just performed a fresh install of 64-bit Centos 5 on a system, booted
fine, then performed a yum update, or at least tried to. Files
downloaded, and were about to install, when it complained that the gpg
keys could not be found.
I would be slightly concerned
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
Could someone kindly remind me the path to the keys, or simply the
one-liner rpm to import the keys?
It should be right on the root of the CD, called:
RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5
(you can also import it off of any mirror)
But that's really strange because on my CentOS 5 install,
On Wednesday 11 July 2007, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I just performed a fresh install of 64-bit Centos 5 on a system, booted
> fine, then performed a yum update, or at least tried to. Files
> downloaded, and were about to install, when it complained that the gpg
> keys could not be found.
...and ask
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I just performed a fresh install of 64-bit Centos 5 on a system, booted fine,
then performed a yum update, or at least tried to. Files downloaded, and
were about to install, when it complained that the gpg keys could not be
found.
I ran into this ab
I just performed a fresh install of 64-bit Centos 5 on a system, booted
fine, then performed a yum update, or at least tried to. Files
downloaded, and were about to install, when it complained that the gpg
keys could not be found.
I ran into this about a month ago and found a web page showing
13 matches
Mail list logo
