On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:09:57PM +, Ned Slider wrote:
>
> Do you know what sensor chip is on the board? It might be possible to
> use an updated driver for the hwmon sensor from elrepo.
>
> I can't find any mention in the motherboard docs. However, hunting
> around online, it appears to
On 02/02/14 18:44, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 01:41:49PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:44:02PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 12/27/2013 07:11 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:40:43AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/25/2013
On 02/02/2014 12:44 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> Oh, one more question:
> sensors_detect doesn't find any sensors for lm_sensors to work with.
> Are you using (or do you know of) any other tools to monitor board temps
> (etc) ??
>
Sorry, did not see this until now (was off at FOSDEM).
I did not try to
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 01:41:49PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:44:02PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 12/27/2013 07:11 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:40:43AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > >> On 12/25/2013 09:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > >>> Hi
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:44:02PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/27/2013 07:11 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:40:43AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 12/25/2013 09:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> >>> Hi all!
> >>>
> >>> I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of John R Pierce
> Sent: den 26 december 2013 05:05
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos-compatible motherboards
>
> > See:https://hardwar
The BIOS is what the hardware is based upon and the testing of a
Mother-Board should be started at the BIOS level.
The Basic Input Output for today hardware is basically based on USB even
for many servers.
There are cases which you see a system that CentOS6 was not designed to
work with.
Not j
On 1/1/2014 3:42 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Just to make sure I understand the question again:
> PC and Servers hardware is suppose to be BIOS compatible?
> In a case that these do comply and Linux is not supporting BIOS it's
> another story.
huh? the BIOS is nearly irrelevant, its code is use
On 02/01/14 01:19, John R Pierce wrote:
> for the original poster, who was asking on this thread which
> motherboards would work, as the hardware.redhat.com site doesn't list
> motherboards.
>
> and useless for me, when they don't include the major brand server
> models I might be considering for w
On 1/1/2014 2:56 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 02/01/14 00:13, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >I'm glad you're so sure (and yes in fact, it did work...), but my
>> >original point remains, thehttp://hardware.redhat.com listings are
>> >nearly useless.
> For who?
for the original poster, who was askin
On 02/01/14 00:13, John R Pierce wrote:
> I'm glad you're so sure (and yes in fact, it did work...), but my
> original point remains, thehttp://hardware.redhat.com listings are
> nearly useless.
For who?
Eliezer
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 1/1/2014 2:02 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> Indeed the HP DL160gen8 might not be in the list..
> I am sure that a Xeon CPU from the E5-2600 product family should work
> and meet Linux Desktop and Server.
I'm glad you're so sure (and yes in fact, it did work...), but my
original point remains
On 01/01/14 23:09, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> my point is, the coverage of that hardware listing on the redhat site is
> woefully inadequate for the needs of the OP. NO motherboards or
> chipsets are listed, just complete systems, mostly servers. Even the
> HP DL160gen8 servers I just bought for
On 1/1/2014 12:50 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> On 26/12/13 06:05, John R Pierce wrote:
>> >that listing is nearly useless for this.it doesn't contain
>> >motherboards, it contains complete brand name systems that were
>> >submitted for paid testing.
> What is so bad for paid testings?
> If it
On 26/12/13 06:05, John R Pierce wrote:
> that listing is nearly useless for this.it doesn't contain
> motherboards, it contains complete brand name systems that were
> submitted for paid testing.
What is so bad for paid testings?
If it was tested for a reasonable usage it's fine.
If you have a
On 12/27/2013 04:16 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:44:02PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 12/27/2013 07:11 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:40:43AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/25/2013 09:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm toy
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:44:02PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/27/2013 07:11 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:40:43AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 12/25/2013 09:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> >>> Hi all!
> >>>
> >>> I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas
On 12/27/2013 07:11 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:40:43AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 12/25/2013 09:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas money on a new MB and
>>> CPU to upgrade my desktop.
>>>
>>> Although I've
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 03:40:43AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/25/2013 09:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas money on a new MB and
> > CPU to upgrade my desktop.
> >
> > Although I've always been partial to AMD chips, I'm tempted
On 12/25/2013 09:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas money on a new MB and
> CPU to upgrade my desktop.
>
> Although I've always been partial to AMD chips, I'm tempted this time to
> find something Intel-ish, I5, quad core, or so.
>
> In lookin
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 03:11:10PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/26/2013 2:54 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> > the PS I'll be using in this system is an existing PC POwer & Cooling
> > 500W unit, which should be up to the task. (It has been running the
> > existing system for something like 3-4 year
On 12/26/2013 2:54 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> the PS I'll be using in this system is an existing PC POwer & Cooling
> 500W unit, which should be up to the task. (It has been running the
> existing system for something like 3-4 years, with a Phenom-II X2 and
> two HD and two optical drives, 24X7.)
wha
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 02:34:02PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/26/2013 2:01 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> > Maybe it is wise to install fedora and just run centos 6 under kvm
> > virtualization ?
>
> that depends entirely on your requirements and intentions.
this is my personal desktop syst
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:34:42PM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 12/26/2013 08:17 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > On 12/25/2013 11:09 PM, g wrote:
> >> because you are upgrading a box, do consider upping power supply
> >> to at least 650 watt for load you will be adding.
> >
> > huh? my sys
On 12/26/2013 2:01 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Maybe it is wise to install fedora and just run centos 6 under kvm
> virtualization ?
that depends entirely on your requirements and intentions.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coa
I mostly use low-to-midrange Antec and Coolermaster supplies, so far
> they have performed great for me, lasted a long long time, and seem to
> be true to spec.AFAIK, they are all made in China.
>
>
Maybe it is wise to install fedora and just run centos 6 under kvm
virtualization ?
--
Eero
___
On 12/26/2013 1:34 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Keep in mind that PSU nominal power is not absolute power, especially if
> you buy those cheep ones. Chinese 450W will give 200-300W or similar.
> Chieftec is another thing.
I mostly use low-to-midrange Antec and Coolermaster supplies, so far
th
On 12/26/2013 08:17 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 12/25/2013 11:09 PM, g wrote:
>> because you are upgrading a box, do consider upping power supply
>> to at least 650 watt for load you will be adding.
>
> huh? my system uses about 200-250 watts actual line current running
> full tilt, its a core
On 12/25/2013 11:09 PM, g wrote:
> because you are upgrading a box, do consider upping power supply
> to at least 650 watt for load you will be adding.
huh? my system uses about 200-250 watts actual line current running
full tilt, its a core i5-3570k overclocked to 4.2ghz, with 16gb ram, 1
250
On 12/25/2013 09:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas money on a new MB
> and CPU to upgrade my desktop.
to answer such a question is not that easy, other than, to say that
most all quality mainboards of today should work and it is really
up
On 12/25/2013 7:56 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> In looking at mommyboards at New Egg and Amazon, I find so many I am
>> >unable to make reasonable determinations regarding suitability, so am
>> >hoping some of you who have new(ish) intel-compatible boards could
>> >offer some hints.
>> >
> See:htt
On 12/25/2013 7:51 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
> In looking at mommyboards at New Egg and Amazon, I find so many I am
> unable to make reasonable determinations regarding suitability, so am
> hoping some of you who have new(ish) intel-compatible boards could
> offer some hints.
my build last year was o
2013/12/26 Fred Smith
> Hi all!
>
> I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas money on a new MB and
> CPU to upgrade my desktop.
>
> Although I've always been partial to AMD chips, I'm tempted this time to
> find something Intel-ish, I5, quad core, or so.
>
> In looking at mommyboards
Hi all!
I'm toying with the idea of spending some Christmas money on a new MB and
CPU to upgrade my desktop.
Although I've always been partial to AMD chips, I'm tempted this time to
find something Intel-ish, I5, quad core, or so.
In looking at mommyboards at New Egg and Amazon, I find so many I
34 matches
Mail list logo
