Hi Roland,
Here is the link for you.
http://iso.linuxquestions.org/centos/centos-5.2/
Regards,
Krishna
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> where can i get centos 5.2 64 bit ?
> all i can find is 5.5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Roland RoLaNd spake:
> Hello,
>
> where can i get centos 5.2 64 bit ?
> all i can find is 5.5 ...
> any help?
http://vault.centos.org/5.2/isos/
HTH,
Timo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
Hello,
where can i get centos 5.2 64 bit ?
all i can find is 5.5 ...
any help?
_
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
_
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
wrote:
> Greetings,
> I wanted to enable blackhole and CSV engine in the mysql server
> so downloaded the SRPM from Centos Site, setup the rpmbuild envronment
> with mighty help from the our own Russ's Owlriver website and tried
> building it
2010/1/24 Rajagopal Swaminathan :
> Greetings,
> I wanted to enable blackhole and CSV engine in the mysql server
> so downloaded the SRPM from Centos Site, setup the rpmbuild envronment
> with mighty help from the our own Russ's Owlriver website and tried
> building it. I have a 5.2 centos box on
Greetings,
I wanted to enable blackhole and CSV engine in the mysql server
so downloaded the SRPM from Centos Site, setup the rpmbuild envronment
with mighty help from the our own Russ's Owlriver website and tried
building it. I have a 5.2 centos box on which I need to enable this so
took the 5.2
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:31:01 +0530
Agnello George wrote:
> this is really wired ... i searched in all mirrors ( i hope ) ... but i
> don't seem to find then availability of cent os 5.2 iso .
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5.2/readme
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melville
Agnello George wrote:
> Hi All
>
> this is really wired ... i searched in all mirrors ( i hope ) ... but
> i don't seem to find then availability of cent os 5.2 iso .. ... the
> thing is all our perl version depen on Cent os 5.2 ...
>
> Does any one know whyCentod 5.2 is not available !! ...
Hi All
this is really wired ... i searched in all mirrors ( i hope ) ... but i
don't seem to find then availability of cent os 5.2 iso .. ... the thing is
all our perl version depen on Cent os 5.2 ...
Does any one know whyCentod 5.2 is not available !! ...
Thanks !! ...
--
Regards
Agnello D'
Julian responded
> You need to select 'install bootloader' to the hard disk, and then advanced
> options,
> where you can tell it to install
> it to /boot instead of MBR.
> You should have created /boot in the partitioning stage.
> I assume you are using some other boot manager
> Julian Thomas
On Mon, 18 May 2009 15:58:26 -0700 jackson byers wrote:
>
>
>One peculiarity:
>I believe I was given the choice of:
>--installing the bootloader into mbr
>or
>--no bootloader install
>
>I did not want my mbr overwritten, so I chose no bootloader
>
>Why is there no choice of 1st sector of root par
I recently used a purchased centos 5.2 dvd to install.
It all went smoothly, and I am up and running
automagically it seems to have upgraded itself to 5.3 Final
One peculiarity:
I believe I was given the choice of:
--installing the bootloader into mbr
or
--no bootloader install
I did not want my
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:30 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf
> >Of William L. Maltby
> >Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:37 PM
> >To: CentOS mailing list
> >
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of William L. Maltby
>Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:37 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem
>
>>
JohnS wrote:
> KVM Switch? Drop down to "init 3". Bring up a shell window to do so.
> Reconfigure X. init 3 is runlevel 3.
>
> I had a machine with a nvidia card in it and added in a KVM Switch and
> then X would not even boot. Removed the kvm and no problems. So I had to
> reconfigure X to work wi
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 21:25 +0100, Dick Holland wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:36 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:26 +0100, Dick Holland wrote:
> > > I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo
> > > attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescre
BTW, I *hope* you meant CentOS 5.3?! Lots of changes, enhanced security,
etc. are included. You ought to upgrade if you haven't and have no
compelling reason to freeze on 5.2. IF you do, good luck with the
additional workload and concerns that may be caused.
--
Bill
___
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 21:25 +0100, Dick Holland wrote:
>
> The xorg.conf looks OK to me (but I'm a bit of a noob really). I'll
> check it against the other system (which is Fedora 9).
>
> I have Googled quite extensively and found no help - but thanks for your
> very prompt suggestions, Bill.
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:36 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:26 +0100, Dick Holland wrote:
> > I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo
> > attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescreen monitor. I'm driving the
> > monitor at 1680*1050, and the pi
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 19:26 +0100, Dick Holland wrote:
> I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo
> attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescreen monitor. I'm driving the
> monitor at 1680*1050, and the picture is compressed into the right-hand
> two-thirds of the screen.
I have a Gigabyte nVidia GeForce 7300GS on an Intel DG965WHMKR mobo
attached to an LG Flatron LG204WT widescreen monitor. I'm driving the
monitor at 1680*1050, and the picture is compressed into the right-hand
two-thirds of the screen.
The monitor is OK as it's attached via a KVM switch to anothe
Scott R. Ehrlich wrote:
> Is it possible to get wired Ethernet running on this laptop under CentOS
> without having to create a virtual machine installation of CentOS?
>
> If so, what is the magic?
if you send me the device, I will have a go at making it all justwork :)
--
Karanbir Singh : htt
I recently installed CentOS 5.2 64-bit on a partition on a MacBook Pro 17
inch. It installed just fine, but wired Ethernet is not available. lspci
shows it as nVidia...unknown.
Is it possible to get wired Ethernet running on this laptop under CentOS
without having to create a virtual machine
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> FM wrote:
> > Do you know whent Centos 5.3 will be ready ?
> > Can I install my GFS2 FS with centos 5.2 and then "simply" upgrade to
> > 5.3 without reinstallation ?
>
> No, you'll have manual intervention because now in 5.3 gfs2 module is
> included by default in the 2.6
FM wrote:
> Hello,
> I will create a Xen cluster and using GFS2 (with conga, ...) to create
> a new Xen cluster.
> I know that GFS2 is prod ready since RHEL 5.3.
>
> Do you know whent Centos 5.3 will be ready ?
> Can I install my GFS2 FS with centos 5.2 and then "simply" upgrade to
> 5.3 withou
Hello,
I will create a Xen cluster and using GFS2 (with conga, ...) to create
a new Xen cluster.
I know that GFS2 is prod ready since RHEL 5.3.
Do you know whent Centos 5.3 will be ready ?
Can I install my GFS2 FS with centos 5.2 and then "simply" upgrade to
5.3 without reinstallation ?
Tx
__
tblader wrote:
> The system is an Asus m2n-e mainboard, amd x2 6400, 8 gig of ram.
> It's got and LSI 8704 ELP raid card, a couple of realtek gig nics
> and SATA dvd drive.
My home desktop machine is an M2N-E Mobo, and works fine with the LiveCD.
[r...@chamkaur ~]# dmidecode | grep -i m2n-e
> Could you please provide a description of the components in the system
> you are trying to boot it in?
> Do you have at least 256-512 MB of RAM?
Hi,
The CD/DVD image was downloaded from mirrors.gigenet:
http://mirrors.gigenet.com/centos/5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.2-i386-LiveCD.iso
The system is an
Michael Peterson wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:44:43 -0500:
> What do you mean by this?
> Is this because you changed the original post and you thought I was
> replying to the other part of the original post.
Sorry? I did not "change" anything. You replied to *my* posting with
questions to the o
I have 2Gbs DDR 2 Ram and swap part of appro 1957 Mbs as I feel i
should have Swap Partition of 4 Gbs for a 2 Gbs Ram yes I am hosting
about 12 sites and domains
on Name-based Virtual Hosts, I got it I have to add some more Gbs of Ram.
one more thing on this system there are lost of cron jobs acti
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Michael, next time, could you please reply to the original post instead of
> hooking in to others?
>
> Kai
>
>
What do you mean by this?
Is this because you changed the original post and you thought I was
replying to the other part of the original post.
I was responding
Michael, next time, could you please reply to the original post instead of
hooking in to others?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
htt
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Tblader wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:50:48 -0500:
>
>
>> Anyone have a workaround for booting the 5.2 LiveCD?
>> I'm getting this error:
>>
>> no root yet, udev rule will write symlink
>>
>> Then I drop to a shell, with a message to create a symlink
>> to /dev/root and
Tblader wrote on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:50:48 -0500:
> Anyone have a workaround for booting the 5.2 LiveCD?
> I'm getting this error:
>
> no root yet, udev rule will write symlink
>
> Then I drop to a shell, with a message to create a symlink
> to /dev/root and then exit the shell.
And that is
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Tariq Ismail Dalvi
wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
> I am having a web server mail server Mysql and name server
> on single machine my os is CentOs 5.2 and desktop
> gnome everything was working fine now couple of days
> back I was using text editor, Fire Fox and GIMP at
Hello All
Anyone have a workaround for booting the 5.2 LiveCD?
I'm getting this error:
no root yet, udev rule will write symlink
Then I drop to a shell, with a message to create a symlink
to /dev/root and then exit the shell. There is also a message
that it cannot find the root filesystem.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Tariq Ismail Dalvi wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
> I am having a web server mail server Mysql and name server
> on single machine my os is CentOs 5.2 and desktop
> gnome everything was working fine now couple of days
> back I was using text editor, Fire Fox and GIMP at
Hello to all,
I am having a web server mail server Mysql and name server
on single machine my os is CentOs 5.2 and desktop
gnome everything was working fine now couple of days
back I was using text editor, Fire Fox and GIMP at a time
and my mouse started to act funny as well as very slow
even my k
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Maxim Odinintsev wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long.
>>
> Hello
>
> Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to
> reinstall.
> Now we want to buy some new servers
on 3-4-2009 8:25 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>> Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long.
>>
> Hello
>
> Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to
> reinstall.
> Now we want to buy some new server
Scott Silva wrote:
> Why not try it with 5.2 and see if it works. It shouldn't take that long.
>
Hello
Because, first production server now work under CentOS 4.5 and don't need to
reinstall.
Now we want to buy some new servers, and want to now, before they bayed, which
OS
install on its, withou
on 3-4-2009 6:49 AM Maxim Odinintsev spake the following:
> Good Day!
>
> We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server
> with Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully
> on CentOS 4.5.
> This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it
Good Day!
We have some troubles with installation of CentOS 5.0 on Supermicro server with
Adaptec AIC-9410 SAS Controller, but installation complete successfully on
CentOS 4.5.
This issue has been solved in version 5.2? Or it will be solved in version 5.3?
Sorry for my English ;(
--
wbr -
Ma
> Craig White wrote on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:47 -0700:
>
> > you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge
>
> I suggest rolling your own SA. It's as simple as downloading the tarball
> and rebuilding it with the included spec file. It's a simple one-line
> command and docume
Craig White wrote on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:47 -0700:
> you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge
I suggest rolling your own SA. It's as simple as downloading the tarball
and rebuilding it with the included spec file. It's a simple one-line
command and documented on the downlo
Linux Advocate wrote:
> Guys, acording to the quickinstall.txt guide on the mailscanner site, there
> is an install.sh file which installs the mailscanner rpm, all the other perl
> rpms. Additionally, the site has also clam av and spamassassin installers too?
>
> any experience on these things?
Guys, acording to the quickinstall.txt guide on the mailscanner site, there is
an install.sh file which installs the mailscanner rpm, all the other perl rpms.
Additionally, the site has also clam av and spamassassin installers too?
any experience on these things? could just forego the rpms fr
Linux Advocate wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin?
>
There is a subscription based repo available from FSL:
http://www.fsl.com/index.php/barricademx/mailscanner-repository
D
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
Linux Advocate wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin?
>
RPMforge has clamav and spamassassin, but not mailscanner.
Mailscanner has RPMs available on their site.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http:/
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 06:32 -0800, Linux Advocate wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin?
you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge
mailscanner afaik, only from mailscanner.info
Craig
___
Linux Advocate wrote:
> What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin?
I don't know a repository with mailscanner, clamav and spamassassin are
in rpmforge.
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpchZkedcZge.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing li
Guys,
What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:57, Julio Rodanes - KNET wrote:
>> I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new
>> SATA disk, the system don't detects it .
>>
>> Any idea of what the problem is?
>
>Even though it's ho
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:57, Julio Rodanes - KNET wrote:
> I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new
> SATA disk, the system don't detects it .
>
> Any idea of what the problem is?
Even though it's hotplug, you have to give Linux a command so that it
will sca
/politica_privacidad.htm
De: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] En nombre de
Laurent Wandrebeck
Enviado el: miércoles, 18 de febrero de 2009 17:29
Para: CentOS mailing list
Asunto: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 and SATA HotSwap
2009/2/18 Julio Rodanes - KNET :
> Hello, I hav
2009/2/18 Julio Rodanes - KNET :
> Hello, I have a server Supermicro 5015B-MT with ICH9R chipset, disk SATAII
> and Centos 5.2
>
> I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new
> SATA disk, the system don't detects it .
>
> Any idea of what the problem is?
Is your sata
Hello, I have a server Supermicro 5015B-MT with ICH9R chipset, disk SATAII and
Centos 5.2
I have read that the AHCI module allows hotplug but when I add a hot new SATA
disk, the system don't detects it .
Any idea of what the problem is?
Thanks.
Julio Rodan?s Martinez
SISTEMAS DE COMUNICACI?N
James B. Byrne wrote on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:11:52 -0500 (EST):
> Does anyone have any idea how this change could occur?
There are some security tools that could be configured to reset SUID bits
on files in certain paths with their default templates.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get you
James B. Byrne wrote:
> I noticed that the suid mode was missing and set it with chmod u+s
> /usr/bin/su. Now the permissions are:
>
> $ ll $(which su)
> -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /bin/su
>
> And now su -l works for ordinary users. Thank you very much.
>
> I am certain that I have
I noticed that the suid mode was missing and set it with chmod u+s
/usr/bin/su. Now the permissions are:
$ ll $(which su)
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /bin/su
And now su -l works for ordinary users. Thank you very much.
I am certain that I have not been changing file modes in /usr
On Wed Jan 14 17:16:01 UTC 2009, nate centos at linuxpowered.net wrote:
> It's a long shot but check that /bin/su is setuid ?
>
> From a 5.1 system:
>
> -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24060 Mar 21 2007 /bin/su
This is what I have on that host:
# ll /bin/su
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24120 May 24 2008 /b
James B. Byrne wrote:
> Any ideas as to what might be happening here and how I might fix it?
It's a long shot but check that /bin/su is setuid ?
>From a 5.1 system:
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 24060 Mar 21 2007 /bin/su
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentO
I am encountering an odd problem with su. Up until quite recently I was
able to connect to one of my servers (CentOS-5.2) via ssh as an ordinary
user and then, from the shell, perform an $ su -l to obtain root access.
Now when I try to do this I see the following:
$ su -l
Password:
su: incorrect
On Saturday 13 December 2008 03:32:20 am Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:32:51 -0800:
> > #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/$basearch
> > mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-5&arch=$
> >basearch
>
> Hm, not hardcoded t
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Josef Temminghoff wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:47:41 +0100:
>
>> I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer
>> does.
>
> Does it jump or what? One might assume from the rest that you want to say
> you can't make it
Josef Temminghoff wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:47:41 +0100:
> I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer
> does.
Does it jump or what? One might assume from the rest that you want to say
you can't make it display websites or so, but this is just a guess.
Provide det
I do have such a rule at the top of the rule set. Sorry I did not
provide more context. The basic structure of my rule set is:
1. Deny some known bad packet types.
2. Accept ESTABLISHED, RELATED traffic.
3. Accept rules of various sorts (such as the memcached rules).
4. Deny all (catch all rule).
Hello
I am running CentOS 5.2 in VMWare 6.5. Firefox doesn't run but Konqurer
does.
VMware host (Vista) is connected to the internet via a DSL router.
CentOS VMware network is brided, DHCP is activated, no firewall is acive.
Perhaps somebody can help me.
Thank you in advance
Josef
___
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 18:28, Art Age Software wrote:
> IPTABLES -A INPUT -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
> 192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
>
> s1 kernel: DROP -- Catch All: IN=bond0 OUT= SRC=192.168.1.2
> DST=192.168.1.1 LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x0
Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:32:51 -0800:
> #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/5/$basearch
> mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-5&arch=$basearch
Hm, not hardcoded then. I looked again at ftp://ftp.muug.mb.ca/mirror/
The epel mirror is to
OK, here are the original (stateful) rules reinstated:
IPTABLES -A INPUT -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -m state --state
Thanks for your reply. I originally had stateful rules in place and
packets were being dropped. I had just switched to stateless rules in
an attempt to fix the problem.
I will go back to stateful and update this thread with the new log messages.
Thanks.
Sam
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Fili
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 15:45, Art Age Software wrote:
> IPTABLES -A XXX -i bond0 -p tcp -m tcp -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d
> 192.168.1.0/24 --dport 11211 -j ACCEPT
> Dec 12 20:33:53 s1 kernel: DROP -- Catch All: IN= OUT=bond0
> SRC=192.168.1.1 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64
On Friday 12 December 2008 12:31:47 pm Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:22:46 -0800:
> > Anyone know why this happens or what to do? I see the epel mirror has
> > changed
>
> No, the mirror for base changed.
>
> > Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml
Hi,
I'm experiencing the most perplexing problem with iptables on CentOS
5.2. I'm hoping someone can point out what I must be missing here.
I have memcached set up on several nodes on an internal network. I
have the following rules set up to allow traffic between memcached
nodes:
IPTABLES -A INP
Dave Stevens wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:22:46 -0800:
> Anyone know why this happens or what to do? I see the epel mirror has changed
No, the mirror for base changed.
> Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: epel.
It doesn't appear to mirror EPEL:
ftp://ftp.mu
A couple of days ago I run yum update to take care of installing new updates
for evolution.i386, evolution-data-server.i386 and nscd.i386 . The update
went through with no fuss. Yesterday when I ran check-update I got the exact
same updates list. So I did not run yum update, thinking this was a
CentOS 5.2 and 4.7 work for me at the latest
VMWare Workstation, Server and ESX :-)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 9:45 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.2 on Vmware Server: Disk space
> not preallocated -> no
Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> I can't see anything to indicate why it doesn't show the disk, but I've
> used dynamic disks for installation before.
I exclusively use dynamic allocation and it works for me with CentOS 5.2
as a guest.
Host is Ubuntu 8.10
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
Sven wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I am trying to install CentOS 5.2 in Vmware Server environment. In my
> VM disk space is not preallocated for the virtual disk (dynamically).
> The installer doesn't find the disk. When preallocating 6 GB there is
> no problem.
>
> See screenshot[0]
>
> Any ideas?
>
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:01:46PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I am trying to install CentOS 5.2 in Vmware Server environment. In my
> VM disk space is not preallocated for the virtual disk (dynamically).
> The installer doesn't find the disk. When preallocating 6 GB there is
> no problem.
Hi folks
I am trying to install CentOS 5.2 in Vmware Server environment. In my
VM disk space is not preallocated for the virtual disk (dynamically).
The installer doesn't find the disk. When preallocating 6 GB there is
no problem.
See screenshot[0]
Any ideas?
kind regards
Sven
[0] http://bayim
> if use CentOS 5.0 try this way.
> 1.make 20GB partition at 3ware.
> 2.make 2680GB partition at 3ware.
> 3.install CentOS 5.2 on 20GB partition, ignore 2680GB partition.
sorry
3.install CentOS 5.0 on 20GB partition, ignore 2680GB partition.
> tonoki
> __
Michael Kress さんは書きました:
> nate wrote:
>>> Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
>>> Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
>>> The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then
>>> the first boot will not take place, instead t
Hi,
Michael Kress wrote:
>> Try again using a volume that is less than 2TB in size and see
>> if it makes a difference?
>>
>
> Just found in the 3ware manual:
> "Even though the Linux 2.6 kernel supports partitions larger than 2 TB,
> the installers for SuSE and Redhat do not. Turn auto-carvi
nate wrote:
>> Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
>> Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
>> The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then
>> the first boot will not take place, instead the system loops. Any hints?
>
Michael Kress wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
> Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
> The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then
> the first boot will not take place, instead the system loops. Any hint
nate wrote:
> Michael Kress wrote:
>> Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
>> Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
>> The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then
>> the first boot will not take place, instead the syst
Michael Kress wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
> Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
> ...
> Mounting root filesystem.
> mount: could not find filesystem '/dev/root'
>
Hi, I'd like to add this to my problem: I tried to mount t
Hi, I'm trying a fresh install on a x86_64 (Supermicro X7dbe, 2xIntel
Xeon X5450, 8 GB, 3WARE 9650SE-8LPML, 3 disks in RAID 5).
The format takes quite long (2,7 TB), that seems to be normal, but then
the first boot will not take place, instead the system loops. Any hints?
The message follows:
Regar
I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRaid
controllers and I despise them. They fail too often and often don't
tell you that they are having problems until it is too late.
Are you referring to the SATA controllers or to the SCSI ones?
__
I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRaid
controllers and I despise them. They fail too often and often don't
tell you that they are having problems until it is too late. My
suggestion is to use Linux software for your RAID array, and bypass the
ServeRaid controller e
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> If you use the hw raid, you can easily manager your raid array with
> either ipssend cli or ServeRAID manager gui (both are downloadable from
> IBM support website)
Faultdetection sucks with that, but you can use ipmitool for that:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ipmitool sdr|gr
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Miguel Medalha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It's a real raid adapter and the linux kernel is able to handle it with
>> the standard ips module
>>
> I found some references in Google that seemed to indicate a "fakeraid"
> controller, one that depends on the driver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My question now is: what would be the better way to implement RAID 5
> on this server? Should I use the detected array and respective driver
> or should I delete the array and go for Linus Software RAID?
>
I've installed RHEL 4 on several IBM eSeries servers with ServeRai
It's a real raid adapter and the linux kernel is able to handle it
with the standard ips module
I found some references in Google that seemed to indicate a "fakeraid"
controller, one that depends on the driver to do the RAID calculations...
It's always up to you to decide but i'd prefer usi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes
with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware
RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache
with battery backup.
It's a real raid adapter and the linu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes
with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware
RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache
with battery backup.
I launched the CentOS boot DVD and Ce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I know that Linux RAID will create a universal, more compatible array,
> readable on any Linux machine. But is there some other reason that
> makes it preferrable to use the SERVERAID driver provided by CentOS?
> Is it optimized in any way that recommends its use?
I alw
1 - 100 of 307 matches
Mail list logo
