On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> > http://people.centos.org/tru/firefox-31.2.0-3.el5.centos.bz1150082-32/
> Sweet. Thanks Tru and Johnny!
Yay, also fixed my read RH5 32bit desktop at work :-)
Thanks!
--
rgds
Stephen
_
> try these in the interim:
>
> http://people.centos.org/tru/firefox-31.2.0-3.el5.centos.bz1150082-32/
>
> http://people.centos.org/tru/firefox-31.2.0-3.el5.centos.bz1150082-64/
>
> Thanks Tru !
Sweet. Thanks Tru and Johnny!
___
CentOS mailing list
Johnny,
Yes. We've got some 6.5 boxes, so that's why we asked. The few 5.10/.11
boxes did get the updates, so that's why we were curious.
Thanks for the info.
PEV
On 10/17/2014 11:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/17/2014 10:02 AM, Paul E. Virgo wrote:
In a somehow unrelated vein, does anyon
On 10/09/2014 04:12 PM, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 12:58 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> OK, I just updated my two CentOS 5 boxes (my laptop and by desktop) and
>> discoved that FF 31 is totally borked -- it seems not to be possible to
>> install either Firebug (either 2.0.4 or 1.12.8) or F
On 10/17/2014 10:02 AM, Paul E. Virgo wrote:
>
> In a somehow unrelated vein, does anyone know if there's going to be an
> OpenJDK update to address newest Java vulnerability? Can't seem to find
> one at the moment.
>
There were java updates for c5 and c7 on the 15th (2 days ago). Not
sure if i
In a somehow unrelated vein, does anyone know if there's going to be an
OpenJDK update to address newest Java vulnerability? Can't seem to find
one at the moment.
PEV
On 10/16/2014 05:55 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
It looks like it has been reported
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
> > It looks like it has been reported
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150082
>
> Good, at least its not my fault, this time :)
firefox-31.2.0-3.el5.centos is still broken, as is upstream's package.
The bug report has already been updated.
What is also broken, again, is
On 10/09/2014 04:12 PM, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 12:58 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> OK, I just updated my two CentOS 5 boxes (my laptop and by desktop) and
>> discoved that FF 31 is totally borked -- it seems not to be possible to
>> install either Firebug (either 2.0.4 or 1.12.8) or F
On 10/09/2014 12:58 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> OK, I just updated my two CentOS 5 boxes (my laptop and by desktop) and
> discoved that FF 31 is totally borked -- it seems not to be possible to
> install either Firebug (either 2.0.4 or 1.12.8) or Firefox 2, the theme
> reloaded (1.0.8). These two ad
Robert Heller writes:
> OK, I just updated my two CentOS 5 boxes (my laptop and by desktop) and
> discoved that FF 31 is totally borked -- it seems not to be possible to
> install either Firebug (either 2.0.4 or 1.12.8) or Firefox 2, the theme
> reloaded (1.0.8). These two addons are critical to me
OK, I just updated my two CentOS 5 boxes (my laptop and by desktop) and
discoved that FF 31 is totally borked -- it seems not to be possible to
install either Firebug (either 2.0.4 or 1.12.8) or Firefox 2, the theme
reloaded (1.0.8). These two addons are critical to me. So I have snaged the FF
24.8
11 matches
Mail list logo
