On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 18:07:08 +0200
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> The amavisd-new rpm in epel fails with a number of missing dependencies,
> in particular clamav* :
You should file a bug on the Fedora epel bugzilla. (Lyx also fails to install
on C7 due to missing dependencies and I filed a bug there a
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 06:07:08PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What is the point of putting an rpm in the epel repo
> if it cannot be installed?
Why don't you ask on the EPEL list where it is on-topic and not here,
where it is not.
--
rgds
Stephen
The amavisd-new rpm in epel fails with a number of missing dependencies,
in particular clamav* :
--
Error: Package: amavisd-new-2.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel)
Requires: perl(Unix::Syslog)
Error: Package: amavisd-new-2.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel)
Requires: clamav-ser
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> I take it amavis is still the recommended way to run postfix?
>
> There is no requirement from Postfix side to use amavisd-new. Postfix
> can perfectly run without amavisd-new. The question is: what is your
> goal when considering the use of amavisd-new? If you just wan
Am 2014-07-16 11:43, schrieb Timothy Murphy:
> Is anyone running amavisd and clamd under CentOS-7?
> Amavisd-new seems difficult to install,
> and clamd is difficult to find.
> (I've only added the epel repository,
> as I had a conflict when I added rpmforge as well.)
If you want to use the EPEL r
Is anyone running amavisd and clamd under CentOS-7?
Amavisd-new seems difficult to install,
and clamd is difficult to find.
(I've only added the epel repository,
as I had a conflict when I added rpmforge as well.)
I take it amavis is still the recommended way to run postfix?
--
Timothy Murphy
6 matches
Mail list logo
