Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare - bunny trail

2016-04-29 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Fri, April 29, 2016 7:44 am, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 04/29/2016 04:44 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: > *snip* >> So what's gone wrong with the Linux Desktop developers? > > I don't know, but that's why I use MATE. MATE was a solution for me too. I used gnome on my FreeBSD workstation and laptop till F

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare - bunny trail

2016-04-29 Thread Alice Wonder
On 04/29/2016 04:44 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: *snip* So what's gone wrong with the Linux Desktop developers? I don't know, but that's why I use MATE. I get acceptable performance on my T410 thinkpad with 4GB of memory and outstanding performance on my home built desktop with 16GB of memory. The

Re: [CentOS] C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare - bunny trail

2016-04-29 Thread Rob Kampen
On 04/29/2016 10:21 PM, James Hogarth wrote: On 29 April 2016 at 09:55, isdtor wrote: Always Learning writes: However the time-wasting problem remains, so too do the down-loaded extensions in /tmp, example tmp-xxx.xpi The reason behind this is the missing patch referenced by Johnny's posting