I'm in the process of testing out sssd on a CentOS 6 install using
Active Directory for user authentication via sssd
All appears to be working fine - however, when I change a user password
using 'passwd' (or at login when the account has expired etc), it
appears pam_cracklib is being over-zealo
Sorry, ctrl-enter (send right away) won ctrl-shift-v...
i used to love MS ADS, but do not love it much anymore and see that
there are other tools for the job. There was not nearly enough
documentation on which target machines a particular group policy can
apply correctly to which version of windo
sernet.de/en/samba/ seems to have the most promising SaMBa binaries
and make an ISO image to download. Described as "
http://www.enterprisesamba.com/samba4app/
Setting up a new domain without existing ADS:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO#Provisioning_Samba_.28Setting_up_a_new_domain
- Original Message -
| I am the IT Development Specialist for a small community college and
| our
| CIO has asked me to explore an alternative to Microsoft Active
| Directory as
| we are separating from our parent university and funding is tight so
| we
| were looking into CentOS with 389 D
Am 30.09.2013 um 07:34 schrieb Gordon Messmer :
> On 09/29/2013 09:56 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> I'd test this over Samba as a AD replacement. but, if your
>> environment includes a lot of windows client systems, and expects to use
>> Active Directory group policies to closely manage those
On 09/29/2013 09:56 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> I'd test this over Samba as a AD replacement. but, if your
> environment includes a lot of windows client systems, and expects to use
> Active Directory group policies to closely manage those windows
> systems, none of these solutions will come
On 9/29/2013 5:51 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> If you don't need Group Policy support, you can use FreeIPA to
> authenticate Windows and Linux guests:
> http://www.freeipa.org/page/Main_Page
noting that FreeIPA is built around the 389 Directory project the OP
already mentioned...
I'd test this o
Greetings,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 10:15 PM, Tennant, Jacob wrote:
>> Any advise or suggestions would be very helpful.
>
> Samba4 has been offered as an option. However, as far as I know, the
> packages in Fedora and RHEL are not capable of operatin
On 09/27/2013 10:15 PM, Tennant, Jacob wrote:
> Any advise or suggestions would be very helpful.
Samba4 has been offered as an option. However, as far as I know, the
packages in Fedora and RHEL are not capable of operating as an AD
server. More specific information is here:
https://fedoraproje
Thanks folks as I will build it today as a VM so I test at work on Monday.
My CI wants me to try to build as much of our infrastructure servers as
Linux machines as possible.
Hate giving money to Microsoft...
Jacob Tennant
On Sep 28, 2013 10:28 AM, "Mark LaPierre" wrote:
> On 09/28/2013 01:41
On 09/28/2013 01:41 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Tennant, Jacob
> wrote:
>>
>> were looking into CentOS with 389 Directory Server.
>>
>> Any advise or suggestions would be very helpful.
>>
>
> That is a choice of course.
>
> Have you loo
On Sat, 28 Sep 2013, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Have you looked into Samba 4 which provides build for Centos and it
> seems it does support AD as DC:
One more vote for Samba4.
-s
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mai
Greetings,
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Tennant, Jacob
wrote:
>
> were looking into CentOS with 389 Directory Server.
>
> Any advise or suggestions would be very helpful.
>
That is a choice of course.
Have you looked into Samba 4 which provides build for Centos and it
seems it does suppor
I am the IT Development Specialist for a small community college and our
CIO has asked me to explore an alternative to Microsoft Active Directory as
we are separating from our parent university and funding is tight so we
were looking into CentOS with 389 Directory Server.
Any advise or suggestions
Adriatik Allamani wrote:
> How about the other Linux OS?
> Feodora is able to serve AD?
No ... samba 3 can not be an AD Domain Controller.
Samba 4 will be able to be an AD Domain controller, however it is not
fully functional yet.
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Main_Page#Samba4
Please do not t
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 13:28:07 Adriatik Allamani wrote:
> How about the other Linux OS?
> Feodora is able to serve AD?
No, it applies to all Linux distros.
PS. Please avoid top-posting
--
Tomasz Napierala
System Administrator
Allegro Team
http://www.allegro.pl/
_
Alexander Georgiev wrote:
>> Basically, the Samba that comes with CentOS-4 or CentOS-5 can do a
>> WindowsNT type domain via LDAP. You can connect Windows servers and
>> Clients (2000, 2003, XP ... not sure about vista) to this kind of domain
>> and share printers, file servers, etc.
>
> LDAP is
How about the other Linux OS?
Feodora is able to serve AD?
Regards
Adriatik Allamani
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 09:41 +0200, Andreas Rogge wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 25.07.2007, 09:05 +0200 schrieb Adriatik Allamani:
> > Thanks a lot for the help.
> >
> > Actually I am interested in using CentOS as
Am Mittwoch, den 25.07.2007, 09:05 +0200 schrieb Adriatik Allamani:
> Thanks a lot for the help.
>
> Actually I am interested in using CentOS as Server for the AD and not to
> join the CentOS to AD.
I'm really sorry to tell you, but CentOS is unable to serve something
like AD. The only thing that
Thanks a lot for the help.
Actually I am interested in using CentOS as Server for the AD and not to
join the CentOS to AD.
I need a help how to configure the centOS 5 as AD server for win2k and
winXP users.
Regards
Adriatik
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 23:35 -0500, Paul wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-24 at
Basically, the Samba that comes with CentOS-4 or CentOS-5 can do a
WindowsNT type domain via LDAP. You can connect Windows servers and
Clients (2000, 2003, XP ... not sure about vista) to this kind of domain
and share printers, file servers, etc.
LDAP is not a requirement.
_
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 07:09 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Monday 23 July 2007 14:33:18 Adriatik Allamani wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> For the moment I manage the user in the network with win 2000 Server.
> >> I want to use an linux OS to manaxhe the network? Is this p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Monday 23 July 2007 14:33:18 Adriatik Allamani wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> For the moment I manage the user in the network with win 2000 Server.
>> I want to use an linux OS to manaxhe the network? Is this possible.
>>
>> So. How can I organize and configure the Cent OS to u
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 06:12:15 Paul wrote:
[...]
> Does anybody else know, do you need Services for Unix on the AD server
> to get the Posix schema?
With Windows 2k3 R2 schema comes with systems (Identity Management for UNIX
(IdMU)) i think. I also read that SFU can break things there, but did
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 15:31 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Monday 23 July 2007 14:33:18 Adriatik Allamani wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > For the moment I manage the user in the network with win 2000 Server.
> > I want to use an linux OS to manaxhe the network? Is this possible.
> >
> > So. How can
On Monday 23 July 2007 14:33:18 Adriatik Allamani wrote:
> Hello
>
> For the moment I manage the user in the network with win 2000 Server.
> I want to use an linux OS to manaxhe the network? Is this possible.
>
> So. How can I organize and configure the Cent OS to use it as Active
> Directory or so
Hello
For the moment I manage the user in the network with win 2000 Server.
I want to use an linux OS to manaxhe the network? Is this possible.
So. How can I organize and configure the Cent OS to use it as Active
Directory or something like this, and to open all the existing users
there, and then
27 matches
Mail list logo
