Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-19 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/19/2011 01:13 AM, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> Just for the record ... we (the CentOS Project) do not recommend this >> site. They are using our name without permission. > > Attribution goes to EliteMoly: > CentALT repository not ready fo

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-18 Thread Larry Vaden
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Just for the record ... we (the CentOS Project) do not recommend this > site.  They are using our name without permission. Attribution goes to EliteMoly: CentALT repository not ready for mirroring, rpms not signed. EPEL is must have to be

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-17 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 02/16/2011 05:03 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: >> >> N.B. pkgs.org is showing that CentALT is at current code and Fedora is >> using a release candidate! > > Per a discussion with an Internet2 professor this PM: > > ACHTUNG: Note the repo is app

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-17 Thread Larry Vaden
Progress report on vetting CentALT repo: SRPMs now here http://centos.alt.ru/pub/repository/centos/5/SRPMS/ One of mirror CentALT here http://centos.tel.dn.ua/repository Denis Frolov 2011-02-17, 12:09 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://li

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-16 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 05:03:33PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: >> >> ACHTUNG:  Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes >> difficult to vet. > >        This is a show-stopper for many, including myself.  Thanks for >        po

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-16 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > >        However... > >        77 lines of unnecessary untrimmed text removed.  Is it too much >        to ask you to be considerate to others and trim non-essential >        text?  I direct you to the mailing list guidelines for these >  

Re: [CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-16 Thread John R. Dennison
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 05:03:33PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote: > > ACHTUNG: Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes > difficult to vet. This is a show-stopper for many, including myself. Thanks for pointing it out. However... 77 lines of unnecessa

[CentOS] ACHTUNG: wrt CentALT repo

2011-02-16 Thread Larry Vaden
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Larry Vaden wrote: > > N.B. pkgs.org is showing that CentALT is at current code and Fedora is > using a release candidate! Per a discussion with an Internet2 professor this PM: ACHTUNG: Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes difficult to vet. F