Hi,
I'm building x264, and want to use opencl acceleration function. How to install
opencl on centos 6.7 to support intel integrated GPUs for 'Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
E5-2640 v3'?
Thanks!
Regards
andrew
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
Hi,
I'm building x264, and want to use opencl acceleration function. How to install
opencl on centos 6.7 to support intel integrated cpu for 'Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU
E5-2640 v3'?
Thanks!
Regards
andrew
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@c
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 6:04 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 5:32 PM, Will McKeon wrote:
>> I needed to pull some rpms from the CentOS 6.7 vault for compatibility
>> testing. I noticed that 6.7 wasn't in the Vault repo file yet, but that the
&
On Aug 1, 2016, at 5:32 PM, Will McKeon wrote:
> I needed to pull some rpms from the CentOS 6.7 vault for compatibility
> testing. I noticed that 6.7 wasn't in the Vault repo file yet, but that the
> repos exist. I was just wondering what the ETA is for the Vault repo file to
Hey all,
I needed to pull some rpms from the CentOS 6.7 vault for compatibility testing.
I noticed that 6.7 wasn't in the Vault repo file yet, but that the repos
exist. I was just wondering what the ETA is for the Vault repo file to be
updated with 6.7.
Thanks,
Thu Jul 28 17:39:16 UTC 2016 , m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> What I
> used to do was ssh-add -s libcoolkeypk11.so. It would then ask for a PIN,
> and add it. Now, it still asks for the PIN, but then announces that it
> failed to add it to the agent.
Not sure if this is good or bad news :-/
On up t
Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
> Tue Jul 26 21:17:40 UTC 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> I could try the reinstall, but it's very odd - everything worked, and
>> now, after the upgrade, it doesn't. Oh, and here's another twist on this:
>> Under 6.7, if I'd logged into my w
Tue Jul 26 21:17:40 UTC 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> I could try the reinstall, but it's very odd - everything worked, and now,
> after the upgrade, it doesn't. Oh, and here's another twist on this: Under
> 6.7, if I'd logged into my webmail via firefox, and while that was
> happening, I st
Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us]
>> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:15 PM
>> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> >
>> >I am perplexed. I updated my workstation at work Wed before I left,
>> > from 6.7 to 6.8. Then, yesterday, I went to
> -Original Message-
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us [mailto:m.r...@5-cent.us]
> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:15 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7->6.8, ssh-add issue, followup, more info
>
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > Folks,
> &
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Folks,
>
>I am perplexed. I updated my workstation at work Wed before I left,
> from 6.7 to 6.8. Then, yesterday, I went to use ssh-add -s
> libcoolkeypk11.so, which I've done many times before to add the certs
> from my PIV card... and 100% of the time if fails, letti
Folks,
I am perplexed. I updated my workstation at work Wed before I left,
from 6.7 to 6.8. Then, yesterday, I went to use ssh-add -s
libcoolkeypk11.so, which I've done many times before to add the certs
from my PIV card... and 100% of the time if fails, letting me
SSH_AGENT_FAILURE, cannot add
On May 31, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Walter H. wrote:
>
> How do I get the standard console with 80x25 back?
Why? Is it just because they’re VMs and you’re running them on a GUI hosted by
some other OS, and you don’t want them taking a lot of screen space?
Personally, I’m glad Red Hat finally acknowl
Hello,
I have several CentOS 6 VMs, I have updated the first one successfully,
but there is one thing I miss or I don't like;
How do I get the standard console with 80x25 back?
Hello,
this is /boot/grub/grub.conf
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title CentO
Hello,
I have several CentOS 6 VMs, I have updated the first one successfully,
but there is one thing I miss or I don't like;
How do I get the standard console with 80x25 back?
this is /boot/grub/grub.conf
default=0
timeout=5
splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
hiddenmenu
title CentOS (2.6.
for example:
[andy@node01 /]$ cat /sys/class/net/ib0/address
80:00:00:48:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:f4:52:14:03:00:78:3d:4
[andy@node01 /]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ib0
DEVICE="ib0"
TYPE=Infiniband
ONBOOT="yes"
BOOTPROTO="static"
NM_CONTROLLED="yes"
HWADDR=80:00:00:48:fe:80:00:00:0
Did You take a Look under Sys Class net?
On Our Cluster i create The ifcfg Bye Hand.
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 26.05.2016 um 13:38 schrieb Peter Kjellström :
>
> On Wed, 25 May 2016 11:48:55 -0400
> Pat Haley wrote:
>
>> We have a new install of CentOS 6.7 wi
On Wed, 25 May 2016 11:48:55 -0400
Pat Haley wrote:
> We have a new install of CentOS 6.7 with infiniband support
> installed. We can see the card in hardware and we can see the mlx4
> drivers loaded in the kernel but cannot see the card as an ethernet
> interface, using ifconfig
We have a new install of CentOS 6.7 with infiniband support installed.
We can see the card in hardware and we can see the mlx4 drivers loaded
in the kernel but cannot see the card as an ethernet interface, using
ifconfig -a. Can you recommend an install procedure to see this as an
ethernet
On 25/05/16 03:08, Pat Haley wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We looking for suggestions on dealing with mellanox drivers in CentOS 6.7
>
> We tried installing mellanox drivers
> (MLNX_OFED_LINUX-3.2-2.0.0.0-rhel6.7-x86_64) on a Quanta Cirrascale
> server running Centos 6.7 - 2.
On Tue, 24 May 2016 21:08:27 -0400
Pat Haley wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We looking for suggestions on dealing with mellanox drivers in CentOS
> 6.7
Unless you really need a specific feature in MOFED I'd recommend you
stay with the, so called, in-box drivers already in CentOS-6.7.
Hi All,
We looking for suggestions on dealing with mellanox drivers in CentOS 6.7
We tried installing mellanox drivers
(MLNX_OFED_LINUX-3.2-2.0.0.0-rhel6.7-x86_64) on a Quanta Cirrascale
server running Centos 6.7 - 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64. When we
rebooted the machine after installing
Recently, I'm seeing DOS line ends, ^M, on my /var/log/boot.log file.
Honestly, I don't check this very often so I can't say exactly when
this
occurred. Is this just MY experience or are others seeing this also.
I checked a C6 /var/log/boot.log from 5 years ago and ^M chars are there
all righ
On 05/19/2016 09:56 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Hello all --
Recently, I'm seeing DOS line ends, ^M, on my /var/log/boot.log file.
Honestly, I don't check this very often so I can't say exactly when this
occurred. Is this just MY experience or are others seeing this also.
Additionally, boot/log see
On 19.05.2016 18:56, Kay Schenk wrote:
Hello all --
Recently, I'm seeing DOS line ends, ^M, on my /var/log/boot.log file.
Honestly, I don't check this very often so I can't say exactly when this
occurred. Is this just MY experience or are others seeing this also.
this file shows ident content,
Hello all --
Recently, I'm seeing DOS line ends, ^M, on my /var/log/boot.log file.
Honestly, I don't check this very often so I can't say exactly when this
occurred. Is this just MY experience or are others seeing this also.
Additionally, boot/log seems very sparse. Is an old issue still in force
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 11:44 AM, Patrick Rael wrote:
>> On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael"
>>> said:
>>>>Is there an ETA on the openssl security update
>>>&
On 05/11/2016 11:44 AM, Patrick Rael wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael"
>> said:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update
>>>
On 05/11/2016 11:24 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Patrick Rael wrote:
On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael"
said:
Hi,
Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for
CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl
> Hi,
>>>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799)
>>>> for CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on
>>>> 5/9, eagerly awaiting the same for 6.7.
>>>>
>>> Looks like Red Hat pushed it to RHEL
Patrick Rael wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael"
>> said:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for
>>> Cent
On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" said:
Hi,
Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for
CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly
awaiting
the same for 6.7.
Than
On Wed, 11 May 2016 09:20:54 -0600
Patrick Rael wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update
> (CVE-2016-0799) for CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for
> CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly awaiting
> the same for 6.7.
The fix/RHSA is here:
https://rhn.re
On Wed, 11 May 2016, Steve Snyder wrote:
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" said:
Hi,
Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for
CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly
awaiting
the same for 6.7.
Thank
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" said:
> Hi,
> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for
> CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly
> awaiting
> the same for 6.7.
>
> Thanks!
Looks
Hi,
Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for
CentOS 6.7?I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly
awaiting
the same for 6.7.
Thanks!
-->Pat
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
ht
On Mon May 9 2016 15:24:20 UTC, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
>>On Mon, May 9, 2016 10:26, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> Any ideas as to what happened and how to fix it?
>>
>
> It looks like your package update was interrupted by a
> SIGHUP signal (that's what the Hangup is from). The
> %posttrans scr
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:26:06AM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> We have four identical hardware system. On one of them the most
> recent kernel update yields this error:
>
> # yum history info 332
> [...]
> Scriptlet output:
>1 error: %posttrans(kernel-2.6.32-573.26.1.el6.x86_64) scriptle
We have four identical hardware system. On one of them the most
recent kernel update yields this error:
# yum history info 332
Loaded plugins: etckeeper, fastestmirror, priorities
Transaction ID : 332
Begin time : Wed May 4 10:21:07 2016
Begin rpmdb: 831:9ef9185577e3d2adb2d1ff0045619e1e0
Tuesday, May 3, 2016, 12:15:21 PM, you wrote:
DL> After update from centos 6.6 to centos 6.7 and reboot it, I have get a
DL> lot of this error into /var/log/messages:
>> May 3 11:27:20 s-virt kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label
>> "": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=
Il giorno mar, 03/05/2016 alle 12.15 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
> After update from centos 6.6 to centos 6.7 and reboot it, I have get
> a
> lot of this error into /var/log/messages:
>
> >
> > May 3 11:27:20 s-virt kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label
>
After update from centos 6.6 to centos 6.7 and reboot it, I have get a
lot of this error into /var/log/messages:
> May 3 11:27:20 s-virt kernel: EDAC MC0: CE row 2, channel 1, label
> "": (Branch=0 DRAM-Bank=2 RDWR=Read RAS=6093 CAS=896, CE Err=0x1
> (Correctable Patrol
On 04/28/2016 07:51 AM, isdtor wrote:
> Johnny Hughes writes:
> [...]
>> I should have the CentOS-6 (and CentOS-5) version of Firefox 45 out in a
>> couple of minutes .. currently building metadata and testing them on
>> https://ci.centos.org/
>
> Broken, at least on CentOS5. The same file/addon
Johnny Hughes writes:
[...]
> I should have the CentOS-6 (and CentOS-5) version of Firefox 45 out in a
> couple of minutes .. currently building metadata and testing them on
> https://ci.centos.org/
Broken, at least on CentOS5. The same file/addon download problem that has
plagued every new upda
he latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it fails on
>>>>> CentOS
>>>>> 6.7.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know there is the ESR release supplied by upstream, but that is
>>>>> based on
>>>>> version 38. We have
> I should have the CentOS-6 (and CentOS-5) version of Firefox 45 out in a
> couple of minutes .. currently building metadata and testing them on
> https://ci.centos.org/
Btw. this is the first ESR after the controversial removal of the "ask me every
time" cookie policy. When the new browser is
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/27/2016 09:23 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> > Phil Wyett wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:27 -0400, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> >>> The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it f
On 04/27/2016 09:23 AM, James Pearson wrote:
> Phil Wyett wrote:
>> On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:27 -0400, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>> The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it fails on
>>> CentOS
>>> 6.7.
>>>
>>> I know ther
Phil Wyett wrote:
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:27 -0400, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it fails on CentOS
6.7.
I know there is the ESR release supplied by upstream, but that is based on
version 38. We have regularly installed the Mozilla "
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 08:27 -0400, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it fails on CentOS
> 6.7.
>
> I know there is the ESR release supplied by upstream, but that is based on
> version 38. We have regularly installed the Mozilla &qu
The latest version of firefox, 46.0 requires GTK3 and so it fails on CentOS
6.7.
I know there is the ESR release supplied by upstream, but that is based on
version 38. We have regularly installed the Mozilla "Linux" version of
Firefox in a central location for our users, and this has w
On 03/07/16 09:06, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> This it is a very easy process to create an installable usb key:
>
--
yes, it is. for some reason or other, i seldom remember to use it.
too much using gui desktop. ;-)
for sure, this reply and reply from John R Pierce are being added
to my 'tricks and
On 03/07/16 01:54, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/6/2016 8:25 PM, g wrote:
>> ok. so how about;
>>
>>yum shell install < pkginstalllist.file
>
>
> yum install $(cat pkginstallist.file)
> or
> yum install `cat pkginstallist.file`
>
> should work unless that list is stupid long.
>
--
al
On 08/03/16 02:45 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 19:36, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856
>
> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock
...
> got t
On 8 March 2016 at 19:36, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856
> >>>
> >>> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock
> >> ...
> >>> got to be down to how the build roots are constructed
On 08/03/16 02:32 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315856
>>>
>>> What's odd is how it works in Fedora using mock but not EPEL6 with mock
>> ...
>>> got to be down to how the build roots are constructed.
>>>
>>> Decided to do a quick test of something given
On 8 March 2016 at 19:13, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote:
> >>>
> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > O
On 08/03/16 02:08 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote:
>>>
On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 0
On 8 March 2016 at 19:02, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
> >>>
> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > O
On 08/03/16 01:51 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
>>>
On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster
wrote:
>
>
On 8 March 2016 at 17:22, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
>
On 08/03/16 11:36 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster
>> wrote:
>>>
Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That
On 8 March 2016 at 16:15, Digimer wrote:
> On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster
> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
> >>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was
> asking
> >>> if anyone tried build
On 08/03/16 07:11 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster wrote:
>
>> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
>>> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking
>>> if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the
>>> same i
On 8 March 2016 at 10:07, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
> > I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking
> > if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the
> > same issue as I describe below?
> >
> > Alternatively,
Am 08.03.2016 um 01:50 schrieb Digimer :
> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking
> if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the
> same issue as I describe below?
>
> Alternatively, any tips/advice on solving my build issue would be helpful
On 8 Mar 2016 00:51, "Digimer" wrote:
>
> I'm not surprised, given that it is in the repo. That's why I was asking
> if anyone tried building it themselves and, if so, did they have the
> same issue as I describe below?
>
> Alternatively, any tips/advice on solving my build issue would be helpful.
quot;CentOS mailing list"
>> Sent: Tuesday, 8 March, 2016 00:05:59
>> Subject: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I was trying to rebuild mtr
>> (http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/mtr-0.75-5.el6.src.r
05:59
> Subject: [CentOS] Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?
> Hi all,
>
> I was trying to rebuild mtr
> (http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/mtr-0.75-5.el6.src.rpm)
> and I keep getting:
>
>
> Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/
Hi all,
I was trying to rebuild mtr
(http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/mtr-0.75-5.el6.src.rpm)
and I keep getting:
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gu9Ds0
+ umask 022
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ '[' /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mtr-0.75-5.el6.x86_64 '!=' / ']'
+ r
This it is a very easy process to create an installable usb key:
1. Download the iso file from a mirror.
2. Check the sha256sum with this from the command line:
sha256sum
3. verify the output is the same as this list (for CentOS-6.7):
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.7/isos/x86_64
On 3/6/2016 8:25 PM, g wrote:
ok. so how about;
yum shell install < pkginstalllist.file
yum install $(cat pkginstallist.file)
or
yum install `cat pkginstallist.file`
should work unless that list is stupid long.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
_
> Date: Sunday, March 06, 2016 22:25:55 -0600
> From: g
>
> On 03/06/16 22:15, Richard wrote:
> <<>>
>
>> "shell" is a yum command, invoked as shown below. I don't believe
>> there is any program called "yum-shell" (even though that is the
>> man page reference).
>>
>>shell Is used to e
On 03/06/16 22:15, Richard wrote:
<<>>
> "shell" is a yum command, invoked as shown below. I don't believe
> there is any program called "yum-shell" (even though that is the man
> page reference).
>
>shell Is used to enter the 'yum shell', when a filename is
>specified the con
>> my laptop without any problems.
>
> It contains the packages on the media. Netinstalls grab the latest
> versions of the packages. If you do a netinstall, and then a yum
> upgrade after rebooting, nothing needs to be updated. If you download
> even CentOS 6.7 and do a y
cted the wording being
>> that netinstall has been a part of last 2 or 3 versions.
>>
>> 'selection on default'? do not recall seeing anything related to such.
>
> OK I just ran the CentOS 6.7 netinstall ISO in gnome-boxes and it's
> not the graphical anaconda th
> Date: Sunday, March 06, 2016 21:32:15 -0600
> From: g
>
> On 03/06/16 19:19, Richard wrote:
>>> Date: Sunday, March 06, 2016 17:12:24 -0600
>>> From: g
>>> On 03/06/16 14:48, Richard wrote:
>>> <<>>
You may want to look at the yum "shell" option (man yum-shell).
>>> interesting.
>
On 03/06/16 19:19, Richard wrote:
>> Date: Sunday, March 06, 2016 17:12:24 -0600
>> From: g
>> On 03/06/16 14:48, Richard wrote:
>> <<>>
>>> You may want to look at the yum "shell" option (man yum-shell).
>>>
>> interesting.
>>
>> would you presume that something like this might run?
>>
>> yum
slow.
yum group list
and
yum group list hidden
and then
yum group install "group name goes here" "another group name goes here"
>
> something else interesting about fresh install, i installed 6.5 dvd1 on
> my laptop without any problems.
It co
been a part
> of last 2 or 3 versions.
>
> 'selection on default'? do not recall seeing anything related to such.
OK I just ran the CentOS 6.7 netinstall ISO in gnome-boxes and it's
not the graphical anaconda that I'm used to with Fedora. There's an
"instal
> Date: Sunday, March 06, 2016 17:12:24 -0600
> From: g
>
> On 03/06/16 14:48, Richard wrote:
> <<>>
>
>> You may want to look at the yum "shell" option (man yum-shell).
>>
> --
>
> interesting.
>
> would you presume that something like this might run?
>
> yum-shell install < pkg-list.fil
Using boot pxe or netinstall with online mirror ;)
Em 06/03/2016 8:12 PM, "g" escreveu:
>
>
> On 03/06/16 14:48, Richard wrote:
> <<>>
>
> > You may want to look at the yum "shell" option (man yum-shell).
> >
> --
>
> interesting.
>
> would you presume that something like this might run?
>
> yu
On 03/06/16 14:48, Richard wrote:
<<>>
> You may want to look at the yum "shell" option (man yum-shell).
>
--
interesting.
would you presume that something like this might run?
yum-shell install < pkg-list.file
> The dvd iso and netinstall approaches are very different. The dvd has
> every
> Date: Saturday, March 05, 2016 22:27:36 -0600
> From: g
>
> what got bombed was originally installed as 4.5 via dvd. so i have
> not had 'joy' of knowing the problems of a fresh install in a while.
>
> i am glad to say that by chance, day before problems i did run a
> 'yum list installed'.
On 03/05/16 20:22, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:48:17PM -0600, g wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/05/16 09:04, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>> You don't say how you created the media.
>>>
>> --
>>
>> true, i did not say how i created cd's.
>
>> so you are saying that netinstall is incorrectly wr
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:48:17PM -0600, g wrote:
>
>
> On 03/05/16 09:04, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > You don't say how you created the media.
> >
> --
>
> true, i did not say how i created cd's.
> so you are saying that netinstall is incorrectly written because it ask
> for a cd and not an inte
On 03/05/16 09:04, Chris Murphy wrote:
> You don't say how you created the media.
>
--
true, i did not say how i created cd's.
i used k3b as it is easier, less to remember, than using command line.
usb's sticks were created using unetbootin and fedora-liveusb-creator.
yes, i did not mention th
>
>
> You don't say how you created the media. Also netinstall used the network
as source, not from CD/DVD. So you should just leave the source selection
on default.
Chris Murphy
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman
- Mail original -
> De: "g"
> À: "centos"
> Envoyé: Jeudi 3 Mars 2016 23:46:10
> Objet: [CentOS] 6.7 netinstall fails at insert cd to continue
> system: hp compact dc7800 dual 64 bit
> cd/dvd: oem sata-- recognized as
>
system: hp compact dc7800 dual 64 bit
cd/dvd: oem sata-- recognized as
atapi dvd c dh48c2s sata5
cd/dvd: lg gp60ns50 usb dvd -- recognized as
hl-dt-st dvdram gp60ns50
attempting install using centos 6.7 x86_64 netinstall
On 2/17/2016 4:56 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Mustafa Mohammed said:
>I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on
eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers
I set one of those up many years ago, probably RHEL 3 timeframe. No
drivers are necess
Once upon a time, Mustafa Mohammed said:
> I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on
> eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers
I set one of those up many years ago, probably RHEL 3 timeframe. No
drivers are necessary for the library, although you wil
On 2/17/2016 3:54 PM, Mustafa Mohammed wrote:
I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on
eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers
thats a /really/ old tape library, like 18 or 20 years old, was
originally a DEC product before the Compaq+DEC+HP transmutation
Hello all
I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on
eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers
Any help in finding the drivers will be much appreciated
Regards
Mustafa
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Mike - st257 wrote:
> >
> > I have not yet found a USB-to-serial adapter detected as /dev/ttyACM1.
> > Try /dev/ttyUSB0 ?
>
> Both naming schemes are correct, depending on the *type* of USB to serial
> converter
On Feb 15, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Mike - st257 wrote:
>
> I have not yet found a USB-to-serial adapter detected as /dev/ttyACM1.
> Try /dev/ttyUSB0 ?
Both naming schemes are correct, depending on the *type* of USB to serial
converter. The difference comes down to a low-level USB implementation det
On 16/02/16 01:32, Robert Heller wrote:
OK, I just tested it:
sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo /usr/sbin/setenforce permissive
sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo minicom
Device /dev/ttyACM0 access failed: No such file or directory.
sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo /usr/sbin/setenforce enforcing
Nope, that did not hel
1.el6.x86_64
>
>
>
>
> At Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:13:33 -0500 Robert Heller
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I have two computers: both running CentOS 6.7, 64-bit, with
> > kernel 2.6.32-573.12.1.el6.x86_64. One is a laptop with an 2 core Intel
> > processor and the other
At Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:20:48 -0500 Robert Heller wrote:
>
> At Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:41:32 +1100 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 14/02/16 02:14, Robert Heller wrote:
> > > I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am
> > > *thinking* it is a SELINUX problem,
On 14/02/16 02:14, Robert Heller wrote:
I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am
*thinking* it is a SELINUX problem, but I cannot figure out what.
If you suspect SELinux is to blame, have you tried putting SELinux into
permissive mode to see that resolves the iss
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
