> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 09:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> ovirt-node-1.9.3-28.1.el6
>>
>> ovirt-node is not in the upstream release for 6.3, nor is it in
>> Scientific Linux or Oracle Linux for EL6.
> Do you mean there are no binaries in the upstream 6.3 tree for this?
> That is weird, both T
Hello Johnny,
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 09:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> ovirt-node-1.9.3-28.1.el6
>
> ovirt-node is not in the upstream release for 6.3, nor is it in
> Scientific Linux or Oracle Linux for EL6.
Do you mean there are no binaries in the upstream 6.3 tree for this?
That is weird, b
Here is my research .. I think no action is required, based on the
individual comments:
===
cdrkit-1.1.9-11.el6
This is built ... not missing (built packages are not named cdrkit, but
instead dirsplit, genisoimage, icedax, wodim)
No Action Required.
===
On 08/20/2012 07:25 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Johnny,
>
> A few more questions because it's not always sure if your reply only
> relates to one package or those above as well...
>
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 05:53 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> kdebindings-4.3.4-5.el6
>>> No mention
Hello Johnny,
A few more questions because it's not always sure if your reply only
relates to one package or those above as well...
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 05:53 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >>> kdebindings-4.3.4-5.el6
> > No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though.
I
On 08/20/2012 12:41 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Perhaps you can point me to a location where the excluded package are
> documented so I can use that for future reference and save myself some
> time going through all the tech notes?
you need to cycle through the srpms look at exclusivearch
Hello Karanbir,
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 10:10 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> now remove architecture specific packages, and packages that map to /
> require / use - RH specific services.
Perhaps you can point me to a location where the excluded package are
documented so I can use that for future re
Hello Johnny,
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 19:25 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Still leaves:
> CentOS: dmidecode-2.11-2.el6
> RHEL63: dmidecode-2.11-2.el6_1 Unless dmidecode-2.11-2.el6.src.rpm ==
> dmidecode-2.11-2.el6_1.src.rpm this is an update.
> CentOS: gnome-power-manager-2.28.3-6.el6
> RHE
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 05:53 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> So, that still leaves the following that I am looking into:
>
> cdrkit-1.1.9-11.el6
> clustermon-0.16.2-18.el6
> compat-gcc-295-2.95.3-86.el6
> compat-gcc-296-2.96-144.el6
> compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-69.el6
> ding-libs-0.1.2-9.el6
> hunspell-no-2
On 08/19/2012 11:56 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Akemi,
>
> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 11:52 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> Producing an accurate list of "missing packages" is tricky -- mainly
>> because you need access to RHN.
> Even though RHN of course is the ultimate resource you can get p
On 08/19/2012 05:56 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Here is what I found:
now remove architecture specific packages, and packages that map to /
require / use - RH specific services.
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo I
Hello Akemi,
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 11:52 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> Producing an accurate list of "missing packages" is tricky -- mainly
> because you need access to RHN.
Even though RHN of course is the ultimate resource you can get pretty
far by just checking the Technical notes for 6.1, 6.2 an
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Missing packages:
> be2net-4.0.160r-3.el6_1
> bnx2-2.2.1.32.269-1.el6_2
> bnx2fc-1.0.10.32.269-1.el6_2
> bnx2i-2.7.2.1.32.269-1.el6_2
> bnx2x-1.72.00_0.32.269-1.el6_2
> cdrkit-1.1.9-11.el6
> clustermon-0.16.2-18.el6
> cnic-2.5.10.32
Hello Akemi,
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 10:10 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> You may want to rerun the script after including the FASTTRACK repo
> from CentOS. That will reduce false positives.
Heh :) Good catch.
Still leaves:
CentOS: dmidecode-2.11-2.el6
RHEL63: dmidecode-2.11-2.el6_1 Unless dmidecode-2
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The fact that apparently the last tigervnc update from upstream was
> missed triggered me to check for missing updates and packages in 6.3.
> Here are my results. Sorry for any false positives that might have crept
> in, but
Hi,
The fact that apparently the last tigervnc update from upstream was
missed triggered me to check for missing updates and packages in 6.3.
Here are my results. Sorry for any false positives that might have crept
in, but note that some of the 6_x updates actually are updates and not a
parsing er
16 matches
Mail list logo
