Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/13/2010 2:29 PM, Seth Bardash wrote:
>
>> Just finished building a new server for inhouse use. 12.8TB
>>
>> Needed a nfs and samba server which could store 10TB and be reliable.
>> Also wanted to replace out DHCP server and our internal DNS server.
>> So needed to ru
> They weren't supposed to be consumer drives. The box was provided by the
> vendor of a disk-disk-tape backup system.
>
> They are Western Digital Enterprise RE2-GP drives.
>
> I wouldn't purchase them again, thanks for asking...
Dunno 'bout them, but I *really* don't like Seagate Barracudas. Thr
Eero Volotinen wrote:
> err. you can get hitachi sms 100 with sata drives for about 9000e
> including 3 year maintenance.
Yes, and you get what you pay for with that..
As I mentioned earlier myself I won't go back to crap storage
after seeing the light..
Even Hitachi AMS 2k series doesn't compa
2010/4/13 nate :
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>>Unless you have a good storage system..
>>>
>>>a blog entry I wrote last year:
>>>http://www.techopsguys.com/2009/11/24/81000-raid-arrays/
>>>
>>>Another one where I ripped into Equallogic's claims:
>>>http://www.techopsguys.com/2010/03/26/enterprise-eq
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>Unless you have a good storage system..
>>
>>a blog entry I wrote last year:
>>http://www.techopsguys.com/2009/11/24/81000-raid-arrays/
>>
>>Another one where I ripped into Equallogic's claims:
>>http://www.techopsguys.com/2010/03/26/enterprise-equallogic/
>
> Lol, Nate...
On 4/13/2010 1:38 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 4/13/2010 2:29 PM, Seth Bardash wrote:
>> Just finished building a new server for inhouse use. 12.8TB
>>
>> Needed a nfs and samba server which could store 10TB and be reliable.
>> Also wanted to replace out DHCP server and our internal DNS server.
>
>Unless you have a good storage system..
>
>a blog entry I wrote last year:
>http://www.techopsguys.com/2009/11/24/81000-raid-arrays/
>
>Another one where I ripped into Equallogic's claims:
>http://www.techopsguys.com/2010/03/26/enterprise-equallogic/
Lol, Nate...
The op was looking at spending a
On Tuesday 13 April 2010, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Those drives are likely fading out of the array because they aren't meant
> to be in arrays in the first place, Adaptec has told us that if you use
> consumer drives with their cards you are operating at your own risk.
>
Every hard drive dies. It's j
On 4/13/2010 2:29 PM, Seth Bardash wrote:
> Just finished building a new server for inhouse use. 12.8TB
>
> Needed a nfs and samba server which could store 10TB and be reliable.
> Also wanted to replace out DHCP server and our internal DNS server.
> So needed to run dnsmasq plus ntp for time serv
re operating at your own risk.
>
> -Drew
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
> Of Don Krause
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:20 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] 12-15 T
Just finished building a new server for inhouse use. 12.8TB
Needed a nfs and samba server which could store 10TB and be reliable.
Also wanted to replace out DHCP server and our internal DNS server.
So needed to run dnsmasq plus ntp for time serving.
This machine replace 3 older units.
We used
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> I would like to build a 12-15 TB RAID 5 data server to run under
> ContOS. Any recommendations as far as hardware, configuration, etc?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Boris.
Smaller volumes is best, but really it depends on your I/O type as well.
s.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Don Krause
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:20 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 12-15 TB RAID storage recommendations
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:57 AM, nate wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> well, IF your controller totally scream
On Apr 13, 2010, at 11:57 AM, nate wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> well, IF your controller totally screams and can rebuild the drives at
>> wire speeds with full overlap, you'll be reading 7 * 2TB of data at
>> around 100MB/sec average and writing the XOR of that to the 8th drive in
>> a 8 s
John R Pierce wrote:
> well, IF your controller totally screams and can rebuild the drives at
> wire speeds with full overlap, you'll be reading 7 * 2TB of data at
> around 100MB/sec average and writing the XOR of that to the 8th drive in
> a 8 spindle raid5 (14tb total). just reading one drive
Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Joseph L. Casale
> wrote:
>
>>> I would like to build a 12-15 TB RAID 5 data server to run under
>>> ContOS. Any recommendations as far as hardware, configuration, etc?
>>>
>> This comes up often:)
>> Things to keep in mind when usi
2010/4/13 Boris Epstein :
> Hello listmates,
>
> I would like to build a 12-15 TB RAID 5 data server to run under
> ContOS. Any recommendations as far as hardware, configuration, etc?
how about hitachi SMS 100 ? it is about that size and cost effective
iscsi solution?
--
Eero
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Rebuild times especially on busy arrays with large discs take lots of
> time...
Unless you have a good storage system..
a blog entry I wrote last year:
http://www.techopsguys.com/2009/11/24/81000-raid-arrays/
Another one where I ripped into Equallogic's claims:
http://
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>>I would like to build a 12-15 TB RAID 5 data server to run under
>>ContOS. Any recommendations as far as hardware, configuration, etc?
>
> This comes up often:)
> Things to keep in mind when using large discs if you suffer a failure,
> whi
>I would like to build a 12-15 TB RAID 5 data server to run under
>ContOS. Any recommendations as far as hardware, configuration, etc?
This comes up often:)
Things to keep in mind when using large discs if you suffer a failure,
while rebuilding in a degraded state it's not impossible or unlikely t
On 4/13/2010 1:19 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> Ryan's hardware recommendations are good. But I wouldn't run a RAID5
> volume that large, software or hardware. It's just too risky as
> rebuilds will take days and the chances of hitting a non recoverable
> read error would be near 100% on a volume
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Ryan Manikowski wrote:
> On 4/13/2010 1:05 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>
> Hello listmates,
>
> I would like to build a 12-15 TB RAID 5 data server to run under
> ContOS. Any recommendations as far as hardware, configuration, etc?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Boris.
> __
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Ryan Manikowski wrote:
> On 4/13/2010 1:05 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>
> Hello listmates,
>
> I would like to build a 12-15 TB RAID 5 data server to run under
> ContOS. Any recommendations as far as hardware, configuration, etc?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Boris.
>
On 4/13/2010 1:05 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> I would like to build a 12-15 TB RAID 5 data server to run under
> ContOS. Any recommendations as far as hardware, configuration, etc?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Boris.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> C
Hello listmates,
I would like to build a 12-15 TB RAID 5 data server to run under
ContOS. Any recommendations as far as hardware, configuration, etc?
Thanks.
Boris.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cent
25 matches
Mail list logo
