On January 9, 2011 04:26:50 pm Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Can you pass along a copy of your configuration, especially
> /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ and relevant /etc/ settings for a
> working KVM domain and network? I'd like to compare.
Sent offline.
___
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> On January 7, 2011 06:37:15 pm Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> > I haven't tried that, but wouldn't you bridge the bond device instead of
>> > bonding bridged nics?
>>
>> That would make sense, but it didn't work at all. I assume this is
>> because
On January 7, 2011 06:37:15 pm Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > I haven't tried that, but wouldn't you bridge the bond device instead of
> > bonding bridged nics?
>
> That would make sense, but it didn't work at all. I assume this is
> because the features are simply not simultaneously supportable.
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Rajagopal Swaminathan"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Friday, January 7, 2011 6:35:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] RHEVM List
> Greetings,
>
> On 1/7/11, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2
On Friday, January 07, 2011 09:37:15 pm Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Neither VMWare, Xen, nor VirtualBox require the "bridged" network
> ports, so it was a major configuration failing in KVM.
Very minor nit: VMware does the bridging in the background for ESX (vSwitches
are bridges). ESX >4.0 can h
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 12:02 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/7/2011 7:02 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> >
> > I was testing it with KVM, for comparison to VMWare, and didn't get as
> > far as that. The network configuration, multiple disk at install time,
> > and dog-slow performance of KVM pr
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 1/7/2011 7:02 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I was testing it with KVM, for comparison to VMWare, and didn't get as
>>> far as that. The network configuration, multiple d
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/7/2011 7:02 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>>
>> I was testing it with KVM, for comparison to VMWare, and didn't get as
>> far as that. The network configuration, multiple disk at install time,
>> and dog-slow performance of KVM prevented
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>> ESX(i) also requires windows server + management client and Citrix
>> XenServer also requires windows management client.
>>
>> VirtManager + RHEL 5/6 does not require use of wind
On 1/7/2011 7:02 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>
> I was testing it with KVM, for comparison to VMWare, and didn't get as
> far as that. The network configuration, multiple disk at install time,
> and dog-slow performance of KVM prevented further exploration. KVM was
> being heavily advertised by
On 01/07/2011 05:02 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> I was testing it with KVM, for comparison to VMWare, and didn't get as
> far as that. The network configuration, multiple disk at install time,
> and dog-slow performance of KVM prevented further exploration. KVM was
> being heavily advertised by
Greetings,
On 1/7/11, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Jim Wildman wrote:
>> On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen
>>> wrote:
>
> It was completely useless: hopefully RHEL 6 and CentOS 6 get it right.
As t
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Jim Wildman wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> VirtManager + RHEL 5/6 does not require use of windows client.
>>
>> virt-manager is too stupid to be permitted to live outs
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>>
>> VirtManager + RHEL 5/6 does not require use of windows client.
>
> virt-manager is too stupid to be permitted to live outside of an
> intensive care unit. It completely mishandles configu
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> ESX(i) also requires windows server + management client and Citrix
> XenServer also requires windows management client.
>
> VirtManager + RHEL 5/6 does not require use of windows client.
virt-manager is too stupid to be permitted to live o
On Thursday, January 06, 2011 12:51:39 pm Scott Robbins wrote:
> Esx(i) doesn't require a Windows server, only a Windows machine to run
> the VIC or whatever they call the newer version of the client.
vCenter Server, required for vMotion, DRS, HA, and a number of other features,
requires a Windo
On 1/6/2011 11:51 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
>
>> ESX(i) also requires windows server + management client and Citrix
>> XenServer also requires windows management client.
>
>
> Quick correction (unless I'm misundertanding what you wrote here.)
>
> Esx(i) doesn't require a Windows server, only a Win
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:43:02PM +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> ESX(i) also requires windows server + management client and Citrix
> XenServer also requires windows management client.
Quick correction (unless I'm misundertanding what you wrote here.)
Esx(i) doesn't require a Windows server,
2011/1/6 Tom Bishop :
> I'm going to chime in here, First off I want to thank Simon for pitching in
> and trying to help out.The problem I have is that while I would love to
> run RHEV, at the moment having to have a windows server to install it on is
> a bit much for mein fact it kind of r
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Bishop"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2011 3:25:22 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] RHEVM List
I'm going to chime in here, First off I want to thank Simon for pitching in and
trying to help out.T
I'm going to chime in here, First off I want to thank Simon for pitching in
and trying to help out.The problem I have is that while I would love to
run RHEV, at the moment having to have a windows server to install it on is
a bit much for mein fact it kind of runs opposite of what I am tryi
>
> For RHEL 5 and CentOS 5, I found KVM to be useless. The management
> tool is not good, and the bridged networking requirement is very
> awkward, and it performed like a dog being beaten with a missing leg.
What guest OS have you tried?
RHEL5.4 and up come with Virtio drivers so using virtio
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Simon Grinberg wrote:
> What I understand with from the thread you are trying to use openfiler as
> your target, have you considered tgt? (I'm using this on all my setups)
> Farther more, please try to avoid exposing storage from a VMware workstation
> VM, the IO
> snip
>
> > But the issue is how can I suggest purchase of product/support
> > without
> > knowing if a product works in the first place?
>
> If you are really serious about evaluation, I am sure your local
> Redhat sales/marketing can work something out for you.
Actually I've tried t
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Rajagopal Swaminathan
wrote:
>
snip
> But the issue is how can I suggest purchase of product/support without
> knowing if a product works in the first place?
If you are really serious about evaluation, I am sure your local
Redhat sales/marketing can work
Test
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> But the issue is how can I suggest purchase of product/support without
> knowing if a product works in the first place?
it is mainly kvm management interface and you can use kvm for free in centos ..
> Souds like old days of shrink wrap philosophy of last couple of decades.
> That too from a F
Greetings,
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2011/1/5 Rajagopal Swaminathan :
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Apologies for Off thread (and possibly stupid) question: Where on the net
> > one can find the RHEV-M general list like this one for centos
>
> You cannot. contact your rhel
2011/1/5 Rajagopal Swaminathan :
> Greetings,
>
> Apologies for Off thread (and possibly stupid) question: Where on the net
> one can find the RHEV-M general list like this one for centos
You cannot. contact your rhel support for your issue.
--
Eero
___
Greetings,
Apologies for Off thread (and possibly stupid) question: Where on the net
one can find the RHEV-M general list like this one for centos
I have been tearing my hair for past week to make RHEV work with two boxens.
One RHEV H and one running XP with two VMs uner VMware WS. One VM is
ope
30 matches
Mail list logo
