On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
wrote:
>
> --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
>> The problem is more that your client breaks threading, as
>> it does not insert an In-Reply-To: line.
>
> All I can do in Yahoo Mail is to preserve the "--- On date, someone wrote:"
On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> What's really nice is that Ladislav, the promoter of FLOSS, is banning me
> *by the IP* to comment on his DWW
There is a big difference between insightful, calm commenting and senseless,
angry ranting.
__
>
> Fixing of what?
>
Come on now. You started this thread.
--
tkb
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Toby Bluhm wrote:
> Niki Kovacs wrote:
> > Ladislav Bodnar a écrit :
> >
> > > Hey, didn't you abandon Linux and switch to Windows
> > > not long ago? I remember
> > > you making a big deal out of this on your blog. Or
> > > did you change your mind
> > > again? Was the
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Ladislav Bodnar a écrit :
>
>> Hey, didn't you abandon Linux and switch to Windows not long ago? I remember
>> you making a big deal out of this on your blog. Or did you change your mind
>> again? Was the Windows world that bad?
>
> To err is human. Béranger is looking for
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
>
>
> --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> >
> > Nothing will keep from joining the live CD project on
> > http://projects.centos.org/ - constructive input is always welcome.
>
> Oh. Knowing that CentOS is the most conservative from all the EL
> clones, I
Ladislav Bodnar a écrit :
>
> Hey, didn't you abandon Linux and switch to Windows not long ago? I remember
> you making a big deal out of this on your blog. Or did you change your mind
> again? Was the Windows world that bad?
To err is human. Béranger is looking for perfection in an imperfect
On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> Should I switch completely to CentOS (that is, laptop(s), etc.), I should
> rather see whether I could be of any help with other issues, such as
> CentOS extras (e.g. how safe is to mix 'extras' with RPMforge with
> centos.karan.org when one
--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
> Nothing will keep from joining the live CD project on
> http://projects.centos.org/ - constructive input is
> always welcome.
Oh. Knowing that CentOS is the most conservative from all the EL clones, I
don't expect 'heresies' to be accepted.
Sh
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> It looks like CentOS has not defined yet a solid policy wrt the
> LiveCD.
>
> You could have taken some ideas from the ScientificLinux
> LiveCDs/LiveDVD/miniLiveCD. Unless you consider them a "rival", or
> unless you hate Urs Beyerle. For instance, they've added to t
> the problem in this case, is that the package should not
> have been updated. It would / should be the same as whats
> in the 5.3 tree. We prolly need to add that to the QA process.
I know that this is CentOS' policy -- to ship obsolete packages on the install
media, just to match 100% the ups
On 05/27/2009 10:25 AM, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> Just updating 1 (one) package and regenerate the CD... how much would it have
> taken to test the result? Note that the updated package was part of CentOS
> 5.3 since April 28 already. (Sigh.)
the problem in this case, is that the package sh
> Yes. We had some issues with our mirror network which we
> wanted to resolve before announcing the Live CD, so that
> the CD would be available on all mirror carrying CD isos.
Ouch, didn't know that there were mirroring problems.
> > Also, how come it only includes FF 3.0.6? This is
> terribl
> Like every thing else we do - its not released till
> its announced. And till its announced, it can change
> - be removed or modified or even pulled.
Thanks. It makes sense. It's just... the regular 5.3 was *not* posted (as ISO
images) one week before the announcement!
And it was frustrating
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
>
> Umm... is there any rational reason to only announce the CentOS-5.3
> Live CD on May 27, when it was available since May 19, and Patrice has
> updated the Release Notes on the same May 19?
Yes. We had some issues with our mirror network which we wanted to
resolve
Hi,
On 05/27/2009 08:52 AM, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
> Umm... is there any rational reason to only announce the CentOS-5.3 Live CD
> on May 27, when it was available since May 19, and Patrice has updated the
> Release Notes on the same May 19?
Like every thing else we do - its not released
Umm... is there any rational reason to only announce the CentOS-5.3 Live CD on
May 27, when it was available since May 19, and Patrice has updated the Release
Notes on the same May 19?
The CD date is indeed 19-May-2009 02:50 and I've found it on May 21 on all the
mirrors I've checked. I was pe
17 matches
Mail list logo
