Hi all,
I was wondering if some one could give me ideas on how I can troubleshoot the
following problem; log files to check, etc…
I’m running CentOS 7.2.1511 with KDE.
I login and open 1 or 2 shells.
If I leave the system alone for about 15 minutes and then try to open another
shell I get the
Hi,
I rebooted a old Centos 5 box and now its stuck in an ever increasing timeout
loop;
nss_ldap: reconnecting tl LDAP server (sleeping # seconds)
This happens before network services starts.
Any one know how I can break out of this?
I tried booting in single user mode from the grub menu
On Oct 2, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Steve Brooks wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 05:24:54PM +0100, Steve Brooks wrote:
>>
>>> 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 098 097 000Old_age - 2106
>>> 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age - 80
>>
>>> replaced with
Oddly enough even though I'm doing a clean reboot, the /.autofsck and
/.autorelabel files were present.
Removed and all good now.
- aurf
On Jun 26, 2013, at 8:38 PM, aurfalien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I rebooted a server having a 20TB XFS volume under LVM and wait about 15
Hi all,
I rebooted a server having a 20TB XFS volume under LVM and wait about 15 min to
boot.
It stays at;
Setting up logical volume management
For 15 min then proceeds to boot fine.
During this time, I see the 14 disks of the 20TB volume flashing quickly as
though being read.
Nothing in my
On Jun 25, 2013, at 6:02 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/24/2013 07:49 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Freezing the fs looks to make the log zero. So assigning any
>> device/file for the external log would work. My mistake was not
>> making the log dev an LVM. However I don
On Jun 21, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> So I have an XFS file system within LVM which has an external log.
>
>> A snapshot volume is created w/o issue;
>
>> But when i try to mount the file system;
>> mount: /dev/mapper/vg_spock_data-datasnapshot already mounted or /snapshot
>
On Jun 21, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> So I have an XFS file system within LVM which has an external log.
>
>> A snapshot volume is created w/o issue;
>
>> But when i try to mount the file system;
>> mount: /dev/mapper/vg_spock_data-datasnapshot already mounted or /snapshot
>
On Jun 21, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> So I have an XFS file system within LVM which has an external log.
>
>> A snapshot volume is created w/o issue;
>
>> But when i try to mount the file system;
>> mount: /dev/mapper/vg_spock_data-datasnapshot already mounted or /snapshot
>
Hi all,
So I have an XFS file system within LVM which has an external log.
My mount option in FSTAB is;
/dev/vg_spock_data/lv_data /data xfs
logdev=/dev/sdc1,nobarrier,logbufs=8,noatime,nodiratime 1 1
All is well no issues and very fast.
Now I'd like to snapshot this bad boy and t
Hi all,
I read that XFS now has a max journal size of 2Gb rather than 128M.
Is this correct?
Thanks in advance,
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi all,
I'm migrating from my Cent 5.x LDAP server to Cent 6.x.
But wondering if there are any advantages to the Directory Server package
itself?
Been using regular old LDAP server for years now. I manage it both via Webmin
and command line as well as some tweaks to a Drupal module.
The fail
Hi,
I've an existing XFS file system which also contains its journal.
I would like to create a mirrored set of separate drives to hold an XFS journal.
Is it possible to move the internal journal to an external location or must I
re create the file system and specify the journal then?
- aurf
__
On Feb 25, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Radu Anghel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:06 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has any one had problems with mail clients were your DNS is like this;
>>
>> doman.com MX 50 mail.domain.com
>> domain.co
On Feb 25, 2013, at 10:01 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 02/25/2013 06:24 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> [snip]
>> I think the only clean approach is to give domain.com an A record
>> pointing to something that can run a web server that does a client
>> redirect to www.domain.com. And even then https
On Feb 25, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.02.2013 17:56, schrieb aurfalien:
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 25.02.2013 17:06, schrieb aurfalien:
>>>> Hi,
>
On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
> On 02/25/2013 08:06 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has any one had problems with mail clients were your DNS is like this;
>>
>> doman.comMX 50 mail.domain.com
>> domain.com MX 100
On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:11 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 25.02.2013 17:06, schrieb aurfalien:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has any one had problems with mail clients were your DNS is like this;
>>
>> doman.comMX 50 mail.domain.com
>> domain.com MX
On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
> On 02/25/2013 08:06 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Has any one had problems with mail clients were your DNS is like this;
>>
>> doman.comMX 50 mail.domain.com
>> domain.com MX 100 mai
Hi,
Has any one had problems with mail clients were your DNS is like this;
doman.com MX 50 mail.domain.com
domain.com MX 100 mail2.domain.com
domain.com CNAME www.domain.com
-aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
On Oct 24, 2012, at 8:41 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: aurfalien
>
>> I have a wild card SSL installed on one of my CentOS boxes.
>> As I understand it, this server was used as a sort of master when originally
>> generating and receiving the wild card SSL cert (got the c
On Oct 23, 2012, at 3:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/23/12 3:09 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> I don't see any ref to the servers name that its running on.
>
> the subject, and subject alternative names.
So it appears that I must export something to be used on my other ser
On Oct 23, 2012, at 3:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/23/12 3:09 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> I don't see any ref to the servers name that its running on.
>
> the subject, and subject alternative names.
BTW, sorry for the mis information, but my certificate file are actua
On Oct 23, 2012, at 3:19 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/23/12 3:09 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> I don't see any ref to the servers name that its running on.
>
> the subject, and subject alternative names.
Yes, but they all say either *.domain.com or domain.com
But not serve
On Oct 23, 2012, at 2:48 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> aurfalien wrote:
>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> 2012/10/23 aurfalien :
>
>>>> My scenario;
>>>>
>>>> I have a wild card SSL installed on one of my CentOS b
On Oct 23, 2012, at 2:48 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> aurfalien wrote:
>> On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>> 2012/10/23 aurfalien :
>
>>>> My scenario;
>>>>
>>>> I have a wild card SSL installed on one of my CentOS b
On Oct 23, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> 2012/10/23 aurfalien :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This topic is one that I am ignorant on and appreciate any guidance.
>>
>> My scenario;
>>
>> I have a wild card SSL installed on one of my CentOS boxes.
&g
> So, now I must export some file(s) from that server so that I can import
> it/them to another server.
Forgot to add that I plan to import to another CentOS/Apache box.
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
Hi all,
This topic is one that I am ignorant on and appreciate any guidance.
My scenario;
I have a wild card SSL installed on one of my CentOS boxes.
As I understand it, this server was used as a sort of master when originally
generating and receiving the wild card SSL cert (got the cert from
On Sep 6, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Barbara Krasovec wrote:
> On 09/05/2012 12:22 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Does any one have 802.3ad (mode 4) working on there Centos6 KVM setup?
>>
>> Of course we are also b
Hi all,
Does any one have 802.3ad (mode 4) working on there Centos6 KVM setup?
Of course we are also bridging here.
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi all,
I read some where that due to UUID conflicts, EXT4 + LVM snapshots is still the
way to go in Cent 6.
I do love XFS but was wondering your thoughts and experiences.
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailma
Hi all,
Any one know were the authconfig --savebackup puts those files?
Or is it some kind of checksum hash type thing?
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Jul 8, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 7/9/12, Micky wrote:
>> The best and traditional way that has been there for decades is an rsync
>> and then reinstallation of boot-loader.
>> It works always if you know how it's done.
>
> The problem I found with rsync is that it is
Hi all,
I just read about some kind of bug regarding webmin not being able to work with
bind if chroot is enabled.
Webmin was working fine for me until I chose to update it, and then the bug
showed (running Centos 6.2 BTW).
So the fix was to disable chroot in the webmin bind module config, see
Hi all,
We have 2 LTO5 drives in a Quantum Scalar i500.
Within a years time, we have gone through 4 drives total and luckily we are on
support.
We catch the problem by doing 2 verifies on the archives; a full virtual
restore were the entire tape(s) are read and then a real selective restore we
On Jun 11, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Stephan van Hienen wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, aurfalien wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephan,
>>
>> I also run 6.2 with XFS but am getting normal behavior.
>>
>> I ran your exact command and du -hs shows 9.8GB used.
>>
>> A
On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:47 AM, Stephan van Hienen wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Svavar Örn Eysteinsson wrote:
>>
>> What kernel are you using ?
> Latest centos 6.2 kernel:
> 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64
>
>> Are you using inode64 mount option on the Cents server itself for XFS ?
> fstab for this fil
On May 21, 2012, at 11:25 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/21/2012 03:17 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Is there some kind of passwd backend option in my smb.conf that allows it to
>> query my OpenLDAP server?
>
> Presumably, you're trying to avoid a proper setup:
> ht
Hi,
I have a scenario were I only have OpenLDAP running for authing my Linux and
Windows client.
Windows is using the pGina LDAP client to talk to my OpenLDAP server, no
problems, working like a charm.
However I need to setup a simple Samba file server-only.
None of my Unix boxes have a compe
On May 21, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Shiv. NK wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> bind cannot load zone files, i see the following in the log for all domains.
>
> i have tried with 777 to all zone files but does not make difference. main
> directories are also owned by named:named
>
>
> May 21 15:45:23 nsfo1
On May 21, 2012, at 7:27 AM, Alexander Leyva Fonseca wrote:
> I need someone to help me: which version of Zimbra I can install on
> CentOS 6.2 with 32bits? I tried to do it with ver. 7.2 64 bits and I
> couldn't...
Hi,
The Zimbra forums are awesome, I'd hit them up.
As long as you stay w/64
On May 13, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 05/13/2012 11:45 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Read many posts on the subject.
>>
>> Using 802.3ad.
>>
>> Few problems;
>> Cannot ping some hosts on the network, they are all up.
>&
On May 13, 2012, at 2:27 PM, Mikael Fridh wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 5:45 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Read many posts on the subject.
>>
>> Using 802.3ad.
>>
>> Few problems;
>> Cannot ping some hosts on the network, they ar
On May 13, 2012, at 12:54 PM, bob wrote:
> On 5/13/2012 12:30 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> On May 13, 2012, at 12:23 PM, bob wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/13/2012 11:45 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Read many posts on the subject.
&g
On May 13, 2012, at 12:23 PM, bob wrote:
> On 5/13/2012 11:45 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Read many posts on the subject.
>>
>> Using 802.3ad.
>>
>> Few problems;
>> Cannot ping some hosts on the network, they are all up.
>>
SORRY typo;
> options bond0 mode=5 miimon=100
is really
options bond0 mode=4 miimon=100
On May 13, 2012, at 11:45 AM, aurfalien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Read many posts on the subject.
>
> Using 802.3ad.
>
> Few problems;
> Cannot ping some hosts on the network
Hi all,
Read many posts on the subject.
Using 802.3ad.
Few problems;
Cannot ping some hosts on the network, they are all up.
Cannot resolve via DNS which is one of the hosts that I cannot ping, internal
nor external DNS hosts.
Unplugging the NICS and plugging them back in will then not allow pi
Hi all,
I was at one time able to get x11vnc to start on 5900 but for some reason its
listening on port 5903.
Here is what the logs say;
-- snippet
X display :0.0
-- snippet
The VNC desktop is: hostname:3
Why is the VNC desktop going to 3?
I was working on 5900 previous to a reboot, uns
On May 3, 2012, at 4:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> On 05/03/2012 09:16 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>>> On May 3, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NF
On May 3, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Cooper wrote:
I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is
showing 64M in size, but when copying the file to a local drive, it
shows 2.5MB in size.
My NFS server is hardware Raided with a volume stripe size of 128K
On May 3, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Cooper wrote:
I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is
showing 64M in size, but when copying the file to a local drive, it
shows 2.5MB in size.
My NFS server is hardware Raided with a volume stripe size of 128K
Hi all, I posed the below yesterday but have new info.
Only across NFS does a 2.5MB file show as 64MB.
When locally on the NFS server itself, the file still shows as 2.5MB.
Any nuggets?
- aurf
Begin forwarded message:
> From: aurfalien
> Date: May 2, 2012 12:56:05 PM EDT
> T
Hi all,
I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is showing 64M
in size, but when copying the file to a local drive, it shows 2.5MB in size.
My NFS server is hardware Raided with a volume stripe size of 128K were the
volume size is 20TB.
My NFS clients are the same dist
On Apr 27, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On 4/27/2012 10:52 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please excuse the many posts.
>>
>> Wondering if any one can help me with the the setup.
>>
>> I have 2x2TBdisks.
>> I would like to
On Apr 27, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
> On 4/27/2012 10:35 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Does any one know of a how to for creating raid 1 + LVMs during install for
>> Centos 6?
>>
>> Do I create the physical LVM first and then raid or
Hi all,
Please excuse the many posts.
Wondering if any one can help me with the the setup.
I have 2x2TBdisks.
I would like to mirror them.
I would like to create two LVMs so that I can snap shot from one to the other.
During Centos 6 install, how would I go about this as its confusing?
So far
Hi all,
Does any one know of a how to for creating raid 1 + LVMs during install for
Centos 6?
Do I create the physical LVM first and then raid or vise versa?
Its seems diff then doing it for Centos 5.
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Apr 24, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:40 -0400, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is it possible to use a 2.3 OpenLDAP primary while having a 2.4 OpenLDAP
>> secondary?
>>
>> Currently I have all at 2.3 (
Hi all,
Is it possible to use a 2.3 OpenLDAP primary while having a 2.4 OpenLDAP
secondary?
Currently I have all at 2.3 (Centos 5) but am needing to up a remote facility
to Centos 6 before doing the main facility to 6.
Hoping I can mix and match but it looks like I may not be able to.
My LDAP
On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>
>> So after I do yum install kmod-nvidia and rebooting, I get no screen.
>>
>> My errors;
>>
>> /var/log/messages;
>>
>> kernel: NVRM: T
On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:54 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>>
>> I also prefer KVM over Xen, mainly I don;t have to do anything special when
>> maintaining the env.
>>
>> But I haven't notice a
On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:54 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>>
>> I also prefer KVM over Xen, mainly I don;t have to do anything special when
>> maintaining the env.
>>
>> But I haven't notice a
On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>
>> So after I do yum install kmod-nvidia and rebooting, I get no screen.
>>
>> My errors;
>>
>> /var/log/messages;
>>
>> kernel: NVRM: T
On Apr 23, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Peter Peltonen wrote:
>
>> I've been quite happy with Xen under CentOS5. For CentOS6 the
>> situation is a bit more problematic, as RH switched to KVM and left
>> Xen behind.
>
> I used Xen for about four or five years be
Hi all,
Having issues with the Nvidia drives on Centos 6.2.
So after I do yum install kmod-nvidia and rebooting, I get no screen.
My errors;
/var/log/messages;
kernel: NVRM: The NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 GPU installed in this system is
kernel: NVRM: supported through the NVIDIA 96.43.xx Legacy
Hi all,
Trying to mount an FW800 6TB volumes.
The logs say;
cannot find hfs+ superblock
and
volumes larger then 2TB are not supported yet
Is my case really because of the >2TB volume?
Thanks in advance,
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos
On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/19/2012 11:40 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am migrating my Xen guests over to KVM.
>>
>> Does any one know were I can find said 5.1 k
Hi all,
I am migrating my Xen guests over to KVM.
Does any one know were I can find said 5.1 kernel for download?
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Apr 13, 2012, at 8:28 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/13/12 5:18 PM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Works fine, stick with the Intel X series, not the M.
>
> he said $100, so I'm guessing a consumer grade SSD like a oCZ, etc.
Oh yea, sorry.
Yep you got i
On Apr 13, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> I just ordered a new machine that's destined to become a Centos 6 application
> server for a publishing company, and decided to get one with a 40GB SSD as
> well
> as a standard hard drive.
>
> I'm thinking that I can put most of the operating sy
On Apr 11, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 12:57 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
>> On 04/12/2012 12:46 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Taken from this link;
>>>
>>> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/prin
On Apr 11, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 12:57 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
>> On 04/12/2012 12:46 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Taken from this link;
>>>
>>> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/prin
Hi all,
Taken from this link;
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/print.php?form=1&topic_id=34988&forum=55&order=ASC&start=0
Seems like I am having the same issue.
I assigned my boot loader to be on /dev/md0 rather then the default of /dev/sda1
Does any one have insight to this?
Thanks in ad
On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 4/11/2012 11:34 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: aurfalien
>>
>>> I vaguely recall being able to auto set various /etc/rc levels based on
>>> /etc/init.d/scriptname.
>>> I am about to create the sym li
Hi all,
I vaguely recall being able to auto set various /etc/rc levels based on
/etc/init.d/scriptname.
I am about to create the sym links by hand but wondering if any one has a
shortcut to auto set the links?
Thanks in advance,
- aurf
___
CentOS ma
Hi all,
Wondering if any one has seen odd NFS client behavior with a 5.8 NFS
server?
While by Nix and OSX clients are fine, my Windows clients are acting up.
I can no longer mount any NFS share from a 5.8 NFS server box on my
Winblowz clients.
I'll keep digging around but nothing has change
On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/25/12 4:27 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>> can you explain to the calculation to determine that 300gb is 2mbps?
>
> 300GB (big B for byte) / 30 days / 24 hours/day / 3600 seconds/hour,
> and
> I get 0.12MB/second, so multiplying by 1
On Jan 25, 2012, at 3:53 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I started a 501c3 (not-for-profit) organization back in February
> 2011 to deal with information archival.
> Database servers and storage servers would go on the private VLAN? I
> am building a box to store all the data
On Jan 24, 2012, at 11:25 AM, aurfalien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Struggling with installing ol Bugzy 4.0.3 onto Centos 5.7.
>
> When I run the checksetup.pl script included with Bugzilla, I get
> the message;
>
> /usr/bin/perl install-module.pl Email::MIME
>
> So I
Hi all,
Struggling with installing ol Bugzy 4.0.3 onto Centos 5.7.
When I run the checksetup.pl script included with Bugzilla, I get the
message;
/usr/bin/perl install-module.pl Email::MIME
So I run this from the command line and get YAML errors;
Checking for YAML (any)
On Dec 19, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Allo esteemed Centos-ers,
>>
>> Noticed something funny with an mdadm mirror based raid the other
>> day.
>>
>> So I had a system disk set to mirror via mdadm.
>>
>> One of the disks went south
Allo esteemed Centos-ers,
Noticed something funny with an mdadm mirror based raid the other day.
So I had a system disk set to mirror via mdadm.
One of the disks went south at a remote office and since there was no
one available to swap out the disk, I thought to leave it for later.
Well, due
On Jun 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
>> carpet is usually banned from computer rooms because it encourages
>> lint
>> and dust, which clogs fans and chassis and air filters.most data
>> centers do NOT want the janitors in there doing weekly vacuuming and
>> banging into the serv
On Jun 13, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 12:22 AM, Craig White wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Scott Silva wrote:
>>
>>> on 6/13/2011 7:23 AM James B. Byrne spake the following:
I just want to say that I really, really, appreciate the
On May 26, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Kevin K wrote:
>
> On May 26, 2011, at 3:49 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
>
>> On 5/26/11, John Hodrien wrote:
>>> Spinning disks seem an awful lot like victorian technology taken
>>> too far.
>>> In
>>> the long term, what's *not* to like about the idea of fully so
On May 26, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> Steven Crothers wrote:
>>> opens community development. Having one developer doing all the
>>> packaging (Johnny) is a waste of resources and intelligence. A
>>> simple
>>
>> oh no! please don't anybody re
On May 26, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Steven Crothers wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Drew wrote:
>> I don't believe you can. My understanding is that CentOS' QA builds
>> are internal to the team and those aren't released to the general
>> public.
>>
>> The only reason we know about them is be
On May 24, 2011, at 3:32 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 03:26:54PM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> On May 24, 2011, at 5:58 AM, Drew wrote:
>>
>>> Who pissed in your cornflakes this morning John? :-)
>>
>> I think he urinated in his own cornflakes.
>
> This is so ver
On May 24, 2011, at 5:58 AM, Drew wrote:
> Who pissed in your cornflakes this morning John? :-)
I think he urinated in his own cornflakes.
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On May 17, 2011, at 12:49 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> We need to replace several servers, quickly - four of our Dell PE
> 1950's
> died in one week. (!!!) So, we're looking around, and I was checking
> out
> IBM. I customized to what we want, and hit 'continue', and suddenly
> there's anothe
On May 16, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:17 PM, wrote:
>> Same weekly/bi-monthly BS.
>>
>> YAA
>>
>> It always circles back to a#$holes and elbows.
>
> This is the main reason I want CentOS 6 to come out. I'm hoping for a
> lull in the whining.
I know
Same weekly/bi-monthly BS.
YAA
It always circles back to a#$holes and elbows.
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On May 13, 2011, at 11:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
>>
>> On May 13, 2011, at 11:32 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> Forget all of this Sun/Oracle debate. It's not meaningful any more.
>>
>> Free IPA will be included in RHEL 6.1 and fully supported by Red
>> Hat with
>
On May 13, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/13/2011 12:28 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> No, but after reading your post I checked it.
>>
>> Looks cool, Java based which seems the in thing, I like it.
>>
>> But, and not to sound lamerz; the Sun sponsor turned me off.
>
> Sun or
On May 12, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Friday, May 13, 2011 04:07 AM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS?
>>
>> We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while
>> its
>> basically work
On May 12, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Ron Blizzard wrote:
> CentOS chose another. Personally I happen to
> agree with CentOS' choice here.
+1
- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi all,
Wondering if any of you have thoughts/experiences with ApacheDS?
We've all had trials and tribulations regarding OpenLDAP and while its
basically working pretty well in a master/slave relationship, ApacheDS
claims more robust replication, etc...
Granted I am working with the version
On May 3, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Tim Dunphy wrote:
>> hello list!
>>
>> I have a small shell script that I wrote that is meant to quickly
>> bring down all of my xen instances in a quick and easy manner. Odd
>> thing is, it does work on the command line. But if I put i
On May 3, 2011, at 4:52 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2011, Mattias Geniar wrote:
>
>> Understandable, but since a lot of people are still going to stick
>> with
>> CentOS 4/5 for legacy reasons, I would argue that nss_ldap is still
>> worth "fixing".
>
> I'm not saying it's not worth
1 - 100 of 324 matches
Mail list logo
