I would just buy a cloudkey and not have to bother installing the software
onto your machine directly. If you do not have a power over ethernet
switch you'll need a micro USB cable and power supply adapter to run it but
after that it takes care of running your software for you you don't have to
in
That is not a concern. Ryzen is already taking the desktop market by
storm. Ryzen is not an Intel design. Intel excels in single threaded
performance and does very well in multi-thread workloads. Ryzen so far is
at least 20 percent faster in multi-thread loads at the same price level.
Naples/Ry
Who do I contact about softwarecollections being offline? I am having
to bypass that repo for right now and the packets disappear in the ether
on their way..:)
William Warren
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman
Yes you would break all kinds of things. In a nutshell folks are saying
you are free to try but when it blows up...you better have a total backup
to restore the entire box. Your first priority should be getting whatever
is holding you back from proper system updates and security out of the way.
What constraint is requiring you to run a highly vulnerable server?
On Nov 8, 2016 00:34, "Dipal Bhatt" wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:12 PM, John R Pierce
> wrote:
>
> > On 11/7/2016 8:33 PM, Dipal Bhatt wrote:
> >
> >> Unfortunately, there's not possibility in this specific situation to b
ALL systems need patching so obsessing about uptime is insecurity on its
face. It doe not matter if it is windows or linux or anything else.
On 4/30/2016 11:33 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sat, April 30, 2016 8:54 am, William Warren wrote:
uptime=insecurity.
This sounds like MS Windows
uptime=insecurity. Patches must be kept up these days or your uptime
won't matter when your server gets compromised.
On 4/22/2016 4:33 AM, Rob Townley wrote:
tune2fs against a LVM (albeit formatted with ext4) is not the same as
tune2fs against ext4.
Could this possibly be a machine where upt
actually that isn't true either. Just install a newer version of
firefox or chrome or whatever..then you are independent of the operating
system in many cases.
On 3/26/2016 9:00 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 25.03.2016 17:29, Eero Volotinen wrote:
@Eero: IMHO you are missing some point
I have a new centos 6 install. Randomly i get out of memory messages and
my ssh file transfer dies. I have tried this in filezilla as well as
winscp. I have disabled motd in ssh and i also had entropy problems so i
enacted rngd -r /dev/urandom -o /dev/random but did not stop the out of
memory
ith all the bells etc.
>
> Thanks
>
> GM
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:02 PM, William Warren
> wrote:
>> On 8/13/2012 12:25 AM, Gregory Machin wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I'm look for an enterprise quality Anti-virus / Malware for my Linux
>
On 8/15/2012 3:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>> the only method I know that works consistently is to block all direct
>> web and ssl access and force use of a web proxy, so the SSL is between
>> the remote server and the proxy server, which is your security gateway.
> The way I've handled this in pre
On 8/13/2012 12:25 AM, Gregory Machin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm look for an enterprise quality Anti-virus / Malware for my Linux
> machines . Mostly Ubuntu on the desktop, CentOS and RHEL servers. I
> must have real time scanning, on demand scanning, and centralized
> management.
>
> Is there anything o
On 3/25/2012 2:39 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ryan Wagoner wrote:
>
>> Additionally if your computer BIOS supports configuring the AC recovery
>> power mode to always on, the computer will start back up. Most default to
>> last state, which doesn't work as well since shutting down will power off
>>
get a ups that has a usb connection. What you can do then is when you
loose power after x amount of time the ups software will gracefully
shutdown the server automatically. some ups software will even start
the server back up once a sufficient charge has been obtained.
On 3/24/2012 7:33 AM, T
, 2012 at 9:49 AM, William Warren
> > wrote:
> >> well ubuntu allows me to boot from MD RAID10...so there's something they
> >> are doing that allows that to boot.
> >
> > That ubuntu version has probably switched to grub2. Good luck
> > debugging it whe
is machine will
come back to centos6..:) Centos 6 is great but it's not right for this
particluar machine..:(
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:29 AM, William Warren
> wrote:
> > why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition
why will Centos 6 not boot from an mdraid 10 partition?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
What's funny is WD is just being idiotic. Seagate does NOT have that
extended error checking. I have two barracuda green drives in an sbs 2k8
server on a sas 6 ir and they work perfectly.
On 2/29/2012 3:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Miguel Medalha wrote:
>> A few months ago I had an enormous
first off..if you are using the on bios raid turn it off. Secondly
black drives form WD intentionally put themselves into deep cycle diags
every so often. This makes them impossible to use in hardware and FRAID
setups. I have 4 of them in raid 10 under mdraid and i had to disable
bios raid f
On 2/2/2012 5:19 PM, Peter A wrote:
> On 02/02/12 17:01, William Warren wrote:
>> On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
>>> If you're worried about io reliability, then buy a (way more expensive)
>>> SLC drive, rather than the consumer level MLC... We have some SLC
On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
> On 02/02/12 14:05, Mike wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
>>>> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
>>>> SSD drives?
On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
> SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
> solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
> quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each m
On 1/11/2012 6:42 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Rilindo Foster wrote:
>
>>> So I looked up avahi on the web, but as far as I could see
>>> it is not doing anything essential;
>>> so I was wondering if stopping avahi-daemon would have any bad effect?
>> Avahi is a mdns daemon. You can safely disable i
On 12/20/2011 12:59 AM, Barry Brimer wrote:
>> 1. The switch being used has autoneg off and has port set to 100 full duplex.
>> 2. Many times NIC fails to come up properly during PXE boot:
>>
>> Any other ideas?
> udev rules?
> mii-tool?
> ___
> CentOS ma
On 10/30/2011 8:33 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Sunday, October 30, 2011 08:38 PM, William Warren wrote:
>
>> Or move to another distro that has timely security updates and long term
>> support like Centos.
> What...Ubuntu "LTS"?
> __
On 10/21/2011 12:54 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 10:01 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
>> wrote:
>>
Johnny, chill. I don't blame him for being confused. Up until right now,
you updated to a point release, then, over the weeks
On 10/21/2011 10:17 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On Fri, October 21, 2011 16:02, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>>
>> Giles Coochey wrote:
>>> So Centos 6.0 is EOL?
>> not familiar with the rhel life cycle are you?
>> Read this:
>> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/
>>
On 10/21/2011 9:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/21/2011 06:25 AM, Steve Walsh wrote:
>> On 10/21/2011 10:16 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> Vreme: 10/21/2011 12:25 PM, Fajar Priyanto pis(e:
>>> As far as I am aware, how I understood official explanation, packages
>>> that are introduced in C
On 10/8/2011 3:14 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Steve Brookswrote:
>
>> On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
>>
>>> I just upgraded my home KVM server to CentOS 6.0 CR to make use of the
>>> latest libvirt and now my RAID array with my VM storage is missing. It
On 8/28/2011 12:43 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Always Learning
>> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 12:31 PM
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.0
>>
>>
>> On Sun
On 8/24/2011 10:28 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>> Because the original post made no mention of "CentOS" at all. At least
>>> that's my guess and that's also the first impression I had about the
>>> post.
> Sorry I should have initially state
Is there a technical reason...like the system won't network at all.. as
to not removing network manager?
On 8/17/2011 9:58 AM, Lisandro Grullon wrote:
Alfred,
I would not delete network manager, it would be better if you stop it
"service NetworkManager stop" and disable from booting "chkconfig
On 8/17/2011 9:59 AM, lists-centos wrote:
>
> Original Message
>> Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 01:33:39 PM +
>> From: lists-centos
>> To: William Warren
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] hardware isues
>>
>>
>>
>&g
13, 2011 11:29:25 PM -0400
>> From: William Warren
>> To: lists-centos
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] hardware isues
>>
>> Well i have also tried the minimal version and the same thing. it
>> seems there's something not going well with the t110(and maybe
I have a broadcom bcm5722 and a dual intel pro/1000 pt nic in a dell
t110. The setup sees the cards and i put them into automatic mode.
After the install no cards are detected at all. Astaro 8.01 detects and
utilizes all of these cards just fine. I have also tried ubuntu server
10.04 lts an
On 8/13/2011 7:40 AM, B.J. McClure wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 00:01 -0400, William Warren wrote:
>> I am attempting to use mdraid for booting my machine but it never does.
>> Does the centos 5 guide for linux software raid work for centos 6?
> Dunno, but boot partition mus
I am attempting to use mdraid for booting my machine but it never does.
Does the centos 5 guide for linux software raid work for centos 6?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 7/19/2011 7:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> to date, I've done all my administration on a manual 1 at a time basis,
> as each system has been pretty much unique.
>
> its looking like I might need to setup a deployment of a dozen or 2
> basically identical machines, all running pretty much the same
On 7/16/2011 12:33 AM, hadi motamedi wrote:
> Dear All
> I need to put my centos 5.6 server as firewall server in fron of a
> windows-running node before connecting it to the net. Can you please
> let me know what stuff do I need to put on my centos server?
> Thank you
> ___
On 7/11/2011 10:43 AM, Keith Beeby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So first daft question with Centos 6 (someone had to be first!) I've setup
> Centos 6 as a Server but as with Centos 5 it used to boot into the GUI but v6
> doesn't do this, startx etc doesn't seem to work to launch the GUI
>
> Any suggestions o
On 7/6/2011 9:17 PM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have loaded CentOS 5.6 on HP DL 180G6 2U Rack Server and the
> physical RAM is 32 GB. As per
> http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/ch-swapspace.html
> It says it should be 1 x of Physical RAM or less. Not sure about the
>
On 5/15/2011 5:26 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> You can use something like this Atom 525 dual core motherboard:
>
> http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/NF99.html
>
> Or this Atom C550 dual core board:
>
> http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/NC9C.html
>
> With the AD3INLAN-G daughterboard:
>
> http://www.jetwayco
On 4/13/2011 5:20 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> William Warren wrote:
>> There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues for 5.6.
>> I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:)
>> ___
>&g
There has been a steady stream of updates of security issues for 5.6.
I'm curious about the timeline for these updates from centos...:)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 4/1/2011 11:32 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
my .02 i would replace the drive.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 4/3/2011 2:33 PM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote:
> Yes, I know that, but I want to download for make a local repository
>
> On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 14:25 -0400, Winter wrote:
>> On 4/3/2011 2:12 PM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote:
>>> hello
>>> somebody might help to create a script to download the r
On 3/28/2011 5:29 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> William Warren wrote:
>> What's there way to do this? AKA is there a proc command that will show
>> me what chips i have installed in a server without having to crack the
>> case? Just a general pointer is fine..:)
> ls
What's there way to do this? AKA is there a proc command that will show
me what chips i have installed in a server without having to crack the
case? Just a general pointer is fine..:)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/m
On 3/21/2011 7:53 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
> On 03/21/2011 05:57 PM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
>> Apologies if this caused any inconveniences.
> No apology necessary from you. Much appreciated for fixing it quickly,
> Ralph.
>
> If anyone is using Thunderbird, there's a handy add-on called Remove
> Du
On 3/21/2011 6:19 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Now I have read this thread twice.
>
> :(
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> - -
> - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
>
On 3/20/2011 10:44 PM, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
> On Sun, March 20, 2011 7:29 pm, William Warren wrote:
>> their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
>> mirrors..:) oracle is basically(pardon me here) Centos with charges.
>> That's basicall
On 3/20/2011 7:29 PM, compdoc wrote:
>> their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
> Somehow a story led me to try opensuse. Sorry, don't know which it was that
> I read.
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://
On 3/20/2011 7:11 PM, compdoc wrote:
>> to which news are you referring about ubuntu-wise?
> I meant recent redhat news about the change in how it will deliver code to
> the community. They mentioned opensuse as being a competitor, I believe.
>
>
>
>
> __
On 3/20/2011 7:00 PM, compdoc wrote:
>> It'll be either Debian or Ubuntu from now on.
>
> Ubuntu makes a great server. But because of recent news I tried opensuse for
> the first time and I really like it.
>
> I understand the need for stability, but for what I do, having the newest
> (stable) kern
On 3/20/2011 6:02 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote:
>
>> On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>>>> .
>>>>> I hope the situation may change now with
On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>> .
>>> I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with
>>> RH
>>> for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers installable
>>> binaries for free.
>> Yes, but patches (suppo
On 3/19/2011 8:42 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> Curious I do not see the php53 in the yum centos 5 repositories.
>
> Has this package been excluded?
>
> http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/php53-5.3.
> 3-1.el5_6.1.src.rpm
>
> http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/ente
On 3/9/2011 12:10 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Some controllers want to map arrays to volumes and present the volumes
>> to the OS instead of drives, so you have to go through the motions of
>> assigning the resources to volumes and ini
t the
basics of KVM..:)
Thanks,
William Warren
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
AFAIK Samba doesn't directly support quotas..you CAN however setup
quotas using the linux Filesystem quota manager. I'm a wimp and use
webmin most times for that..:) of course i do NOT have that exposed
externally(that's what vpn's are for.. On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> On 02
On 2/23/2011 9:49 AM, Trutwin, Joshua wrote:
Hello all,
I'm looking to setup a new CentOS box for a buddy of mine who
wants to do hosting on a server via CoLo, Years ago I whipped up a CP
of my
own on a Debian box he colo'd running a basterdized qmail/tinydns and
custom
built httpd/mysql/etc
On 2/21/2011 1:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> This is the last post I am making to this thread ... and maybe to this
>> list in general. During the build processes, here are the files that we
>> have had to add (at various times) to g
On 2/21/2011 12:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/21/2011 11:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 2/21/11 10:35 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
So you are now saying that you cannot scale out this work to more people
to release faster ? This is something that has to be done by Karanbir only ?
Dag,
The pac
On 2/14/2011 12:29 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampen
> wrote:
>> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC
>>> demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn in
>>> the ssytem components on
On 1/26/2011 8:35 PM, Mitch Patenaude wrote:
We're running a large cluster, and are leery of upgrading them all to
5.5, but would like to find the latest security patches.
Is there a repo for this? I can't seem to find a 5.4 specific update
repo with anything since last March. Is 5.4 EOL'd?
On 1/22/2011 5:45 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> I am sure there is a more relevant list you could take something of this
>> nature to.
> Hi Karanbir
>
> can you name me a list for general Open Source discussions?
> thanks
>
> cheers Sven
> _
On 1/14/2011 9:05 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/14/11 5:29 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
>> Home ISP blocking bittorrent; company now blocks bittorrent.
>>
>> I want/need an old release (CentOS 5.2) to install as a VirtualBox guest.
>>
>> I suppose I could install from the cd iso images, but it is
On 12/28/2010 5:18 PM, Nataraj wrote:
On 12/28/2010 01:41 PM, james wrote:
>Do you have everything *else* updated? And what kind of web service
>are you running?
>There's a lot of third party freeware and commercial tools that was
>not written with any kind of resource management in mind, and w
On 12/26/2010 11:04 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
>> RAID 5 does provide speed increases for read operations. There are
>> still some applications where RAID 5 has its benefits. For a smaller
>> department file server 3-4 TB drives in RAID 5 works grea
On 12/24/2010 7:57 AM, Markandeya wrote:
> Dear Friends of CentOS,
> I read a reply by John R Pierce, Re: [CentOS] LVM change disk
> December 04, 2010 01:30PM
> "do you realize that if any one of those 4 miscellaneous drives fails,
> you lose the whole volume?"
>
> Can anyone confirm this? and than
On 12/20/2010 5:40 PM, Matt wrote:
> Does SATA Native Command Queueing and Linux software RAID1 play well
> together or is it better to turn off NCQ when doing software RAID?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailma
On 12/20/2010 3:35 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> *sigh*
> I'm sitting here with my manager and the other admin, as they argue as to
> when CentOS 6 will be out. Anyone have a clue as to when? Are we getting
> close?
>
> mark
>
> ___
> CentOS maili
On 12/11/2010 11:15 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> If you use any NAS (or a SAN) devices, what do you use? And I'm
> referring more to larger scale network storage than your home PC or
> home theater system.
>
> We've had very good experiences with our NetGear ReadyNAS devices but
> I'm in the market for
On 12/8/2010 9:13 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 08, 2010 09:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 12/8/10 4:22 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
>>> On 30/11/10 03:52, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> [...snip...]
> As was alread
On 12/1/2010 2:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>>
Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
are some Intel
On 12/1/2010 2:33 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Timo Schoeler wrote:
>>>
Intel. Broadcom. That's what we use here w/o any issues; however, there
are some Intel
On 12/1/2010 2:12 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> Hello listmates,
>
> As some of you may know we have been having a really bad problem with
> Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 cards. See here for details:
>
> http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?24,140124,140224
>
> So now my question is, what PCI 1
On 11/28/2010 7:55 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Bob McConnell
> wrote:
>> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> On Sunday 28 November 2010 13:15:24 Bob McConnell wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Y
On 11/28/2010 8:15 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>> On Sunday 28 November 2010 03:45:54 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:21 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
You run it in Permissive mode, you deal with the exceptions as
they arise whil
On 11/23/2010 9:18 AM, Nicolas Ross wrote:
> Hi again !
>
> I am begining to play with my new servers. I got for starter 2 nodes (1u
> intel server platform, with a LSI Logic FC949ES FC card). I am like a child
> playing with his new toys at christmas... I can't wait for CentOS 6 to come
> out.
>
>
It's on their website right now.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10/31/2010 3:27 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Yesterday I was installing Centos 5.5 to my web server, and
> it looks like the main hard drive has gone AWOL.
>
> Fedora 12 put the file system into r/o mode.
>
> The drive is an Hitachi, still under warranty.
>
> There are bad sectors on i
my church just got some ibm x335's donated. Cent 5 is only relaly
dvd's. I do have a windows server using IIS for internal stuff. How
would i setup a local repo for the dvd so i can point the net install
iso to the windows box?
___
CentOS mailing
On 8/22/2010 8:11 PM, Michael Semcheski wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
>> Your Linksys router IS a simple 32-bit computer running Linux (typicall
>> an ARM processor, not really any faster than a PIII, probably slower
>> actually). A PIII has more than enough proc
On 7/14/2010 1:16 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> On 7/14/10, William Warren
> wrote:
>> ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and
>> been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a
>> linux system.
> Go
On 7/13/2010 9:11 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>> 2010/7/14 William Warren:
>>> I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
>>> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number o
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it
anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network
interfaces in the Kernel?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 7/10/2010 10:59 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to install a small network in a school in a nearby village. The
> network will be Linux-only, one server and fifteen desktops. Here's the
> idea.
>
> 1) Authentication should be managed centrally on the server.
>
> 2) User home directorie
On 6/9/2010 8:27 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> William Warren wrote:
>
>> jsut put the bios into sata or ata mode and not raid..then the raid
>> functionality is zero..:
>>
> even when its enabled, the raid functionaliy of the ICH??R chips is
> zero. :)
On 6/9/2010 7:44 PM, nate wrote:
> Hey there..
>
> I was wondering if anyone could share experiences they have had
> with the Intel ICH10R SATA controller? I tried looking around
> but all I could find were RAID references, I have no interest
> in using the RAID functionality just basic SATA JBOD.
On 5/22/2010 3:39 PM, Aniruddha wrote:
> Coming from Gentoo -> Debian I am to trying to understand the way
> CentOS works. In Debian very little happens in stable releases and you
> use apt-get update to apply security updates and apt-get dist-upgrade
> for a major upgrade.
>
> In CentOS there is
On 4/2/2010 2:22 PM, mattias wrote:
> i no i can upgrade centos the new version
> but can i downgrade?
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
Backup and reload..
__
Having list issues..sorry.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I'm not surprised at the "delay" for RHEL 6. Consider 2.x is still
supported this means they are supporting 4 different RHEL versions right
now. I would actually wait until at least 2.x dies..if not maybe 3.x
before spitting out another version.
On 4/1/2010 7:16 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> On 0
On 3/21/2010 9:31 AM, mattias wrote:
> I upgraded my centos from 5.0 to 5.4
> But i still see 5.0 n the version number
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
did you reboot?
__
On 2/10/2010 9:15 AM, Robert Heller wrote:
> At Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:37:28 -0600 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>
>> In our computer lab, there are 6 Centos 5.4 workstations. There is an
>> HP printer with jet direct card. It often works.
>>
>> But sometimes users come and get me saying the pri
On 2/2/2010 6:20 AM, Rafa? Radecki wrote:
Hi All.
I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to
use one of the following options:
- KVM;
- VMWare Esxi;
- VMWare Workstation.
I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something
like LVM snapshots for backu
On 1/17/2010 7:22 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> I have been using a free DNS service for the past seven (7) years.
> This morning, at 4 A.M., , I changed the "A" record for one of my web
> sites, to point to an IP address on a different server, so I could
> test. After watching the TTL count down fro
On 1/11/2010 1:33 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/11/2010 11:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>
>>> It seems X4500 (not available anymore) had Marvell SATA controllers, that
>>> are not supported with RHEL5.
>>>
>>>
>> And those marvell controllers caused ma
On 1/7/2010 9:30 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
>> On 01/06/2010 09:35 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set
>>> up some storage servers to run und
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
